Continuity of care for children with complex chronic health conditions: parents' perspectives

Anton R Miller, Christopher J Condin, William H McKellin, Nicola Shaw, Anne F Klassen, Sam Sheps, Anton R Miller, Christopher J Condin, William H McKellin, Nicola Shaw, Anne F Klassen, Sam Sheps

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care has been explored largely from academic and service provider perspectives, and in relation to adult patient/client groups. We interviewed parents of children with complex chronic health conditions to examine how their experiences and perceptions of continuity of care fit with these perspectives; and to identify the salient factors in the experience of, and factors contributing to, continuity in this population.

Methods: Parents of 47 elementary school-aged children with spina bifida, Down syndrome, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Duchenne muscular dystrophy or cystic fibrosis participated in semi-structured interviews. Parents described and mapped the pattern of their interactions with service providers over time in all domains relevant to their child's health, well-being, and development (medical, rehabilitational, educational, and social supportive services), with particular attention paid to their perceptions of connectedness or coherency in these interactions. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed thematically using a framework approach to impose structure regarding parents' perspectives on continuity of care.

Results: Existing academic concepts of relational, informational and management continuity were all discernable in parents' narratives. A thorough knowledge of the child on the part of service providers emerged as extremely important to parents; such knowledge was underpinned by continuity of personal relationships, principally, and also by written information. For this population, notions of continuity extend to the full range of service providers these children and families need to achieve optimal health status, and are not limited to physicians and nurses. Communication among providers was seen as integral to perceived continuity. Compartmentalization of services and information led to parents assuming a necessary, though at times, uncomfortable, coordinating role. Geographic factors, institutional structures and practices, provider attitudes, and, on occasion, parent preferences and judgments, were all found to create barriers to "seamless" management and provision of care continuity across providers, settings, and sectors.

Conclusions: These findings add new perspectives to the understanding of continuity within chronically ill children's health care. They are relevant to contemporary initiatives to improve continuity of services to children with special health care needs, demonstrate the need for parental support of their important role in maintaining continuity, and suggest avenues for further research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of service network diagram. Notes: Interconnections among service providers are not shown

References

    1. World Health Organization. The Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions framework (ICCC)
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
    1. Gulliford M, Naithani S, Morgan M. What is 'continuity of care'? Journal of Health Services Research Policy. 2006;11:248–250.
    1. Wierdsma A, Mulder C, de Vries S, Sytema S. Reconstructing continuity of care in mental health services: a multilevel conceptual framework. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:52–57.
    1. Jee SH, Cabana MD. Indices for Continuity of Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:158–188.
    1. Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract. 2003;20:623–627.
    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219–1221.
    1. Reid R, Haggerty J, McKendry R. Defusing the Confusion: Concepts and Measures of Continuity of Healthcare. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (CHSRF); 2002.
    1. Cowie L, Morgan M, White P, Gulliford M. Experience of continuity of care of patients with multiple long-term conditions in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:82–87.
    1. Sparbel KJ, Anderson MA. Integrated literature review of continuity of care: Part 1, Conceptual issues. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2000;32:17–24.
    1. Breslau N, Mortimer EA Jr. Seeing the Same Doctor: Determinants of Satisfaction with Specialty Care for Disabled Children. Med Care. 1981;19:741–758.
    1. Breslau N. Continuity Reexamined: Differential Impact on Satisfaction with Medical Care for Disabled and Normal Children. Med Care. 1982;20:347–360.
    1. Msall ME, Avery RC, Tremont MR, Lima JC, Rogers ML, Hogan DP. Functional disability and school activity limitations in 41,300 school-age children: relationship to medical impairments. Pediatrics. 2003;111:548–553.
    1. Kohen DE, Brehaut JC, Garner RE, Miller AR, Lach LM, Klassen AF. Conceptualizing childhood health problems using survey data: a comparison of key indicators. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:40–52.
    1. Perrin JM, Romm D, Bloom SR, Homer CJ, Kuhlthau KA, Cooley C. A Family-Centered, Community-Based System of Services for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:933–936.
    1. Stein RE. Challenges in long-term health care for children. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1:280–288.
    1. Ray LD. Parenting and childhood chronicity: making visible the invisible work. J Pediatr Nurs. 2002;17:424–438.
    1. Spalding KL, Hayes VE, Williams AP, McKeever P. Analysis of interface along the continuum of care. Technical report 5: Services for children with special needs and their families. Report to Health Canada, Home Care and Pharmaceuticals Division, Health Policy and Communications Branch. Victoria, BC: Hollander Analytical Services Ltd; 2002.
    1. Miller AR, Recsky MA, Armstrong RW. Responding to the needs of children with chronic health conditions in an era of health services reform. CMAJ. 2004;171:1366–1367.
    1. Forrest CB, Simpson L, Clancy C. Child health services research. Challenges and opportunities. JAMA. 1997;277:1787–1793.
    1. Stein RE, Silver EJ. Operationalizing a conceptually based noncategorical definition: a first look at US children with chronic conditions. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:68–74.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006.
    1. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
    1. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications Inc; 2003.
    1. Wallander JL, Dekker MC, Koot HM, Glidden LM. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. Vol. 26. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press; 2003. Psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: measurement, prevalence, course, and risk; pp. 93–134.
    1. Scott JM, Hawkins P. Organisational silos: affecting the discharge of elderly patients. J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22:309–318.
    1. Sofaer S. Navigating poorly charted territory: patient dilemmas in health care "nonsystems". Medical Care Research & Review. 2009;66:75S–93S.
    1. Antonelli RC, McAllister JW, Popp J. Making Care Coordination a Critical Component of the Pediatric Health System: A Multidisciplinary Framework. The Commonwealth Fund; 2009.
    1. Shortell SM. Continuity of medical care: conceptualization and measurement. Med Care. 1976;14:377–391.
    1. Horvitz-Lennon M, Kilbourne AM, Pincus HA. From silos to bridges: meeting the general health care needs of adults with severe mental illnesses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:659–669.
    1. Ginsburg S. Colocating Health Services: A Way to Improve Coordination of Children's Health Care? New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2008.
    1. Brashers VL, Curry CE, Harper DC, McDaniel SH, Pawlson G, Ball JW. Interprofessional Health Care Education: Recommendations of the National Academies of Practice Expert Panel on Health Care in the 21st Century. Issues in Interdisciplinary Care. 2001;3:21–31.
    1. Health Canada. Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient-Centred Practice. Ottawa, ON; 2007.
    1. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Children's Health, the Nation's Wealth: Assessing and Improving Child Health. Washington, DC The National Academies Press; 2004.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Children with Disabilities. Care coordination in the medical home: integrating health and related systems of care for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1238–1244.
    1. Sloper P, Greco V, Beecham J, Webb R. Key worker services for disabled children: what characteristics of services lead to better outcomes for children and families? Child Care Health Dev. 2006;32:147–157.
    1. Rahi JS, Manaras I, Tuomainen H, Hundt GL. Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e477–e482.
    1. Berwick DM. What 'Patient-Centered' Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w555–w565.
    1. Ogilvie LD, Burgess-Pinto E, Caufield C. Challenges and approaches to newcomer health research. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2008;19:64–73.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj