Remote Patient Monitoring and Telemedicine in Neonatal and Pediatric Settings: Scoping Literature Review

Farzan Sasangohar, Elise Davis, Bita A Kash, Sohail R Shah, Farzan Sasangohar, Elise Davis, Bita A Kash, Sohail R Shah

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine and telehealth solutions are emerging rapidly in health care and have the potential to decrease costs for insurers, providers, and patients in various settings. Pediatric populations that require specialty care are disadvantaged socially or economically or have chronic health conditions that will greatly benefit from results of studies utilizing telemedicine technologies. This paper examines the emerging trends in pediatric populations as part of a systematic literature review and provides a scoping review of the type, extent, and quantity of research available.

Objective: This paper aims to examine the role of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and telemedicine in neonatal and pediatric settings. Findings can be used to identify strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the field. The identification of gaps will allow for interventions or research to improve health care quality and costs.

Methods: A systematic literature review is being conducted to gather an adequate amount of relevant research for telehealth in pediatric populations. The fields of RPM and telemedicine are not yet very well established by the health care services sector, and definitions vary across health care systems; thus, the terms are not always defined similarly throughout the literature. Three databases were scoped for information for this specific review, and 56 papers were included for review.

Results: Three major telemedicine trends emerged from the review of 45 relevant papers-RPM, teleconsultation, and monitoring patients within the hospital, but without contact-thus, decreasing the likelihood of infection or other adverse health effects.

Conclusions: While the current telemedicine approaches show promise, limited studied conditions and small sample sizes affect generalizability, therefore, warranting further research. The information presented can inform health care providers of the most widely implemented, studied, and effective forms of telemedicine for patients and their families and the telemedicine initiatives that are most cost efficient for health systems. While the focus of this review is to summarize some telehealth applications in pediatrics, we have also presented research studies that can inform providers about the importance of data sharing of remote monitoring data between hospitals. Further reports will be developed to inform health systems as the systematic literature review continues.

Keywords: neonatal; pediatric; remote patient monitoring; telehealth; telemedicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Farzan Sasangohar, Elise Davis, Bita A Kash, Sohail R Shah. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.12.2018.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram.

References

    1. Health Resources and Services Administration Telehealth Programs. 2015. [2017-01-03].
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Health Information Technology. 2017. [2017-01-07]. .
    1. World Health Organization Health and sustainable development, telehealth. 2017. [2017-01-03].
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    1. DeSalvo DJ, Keith-Hynes P, Peyser T, Place J, Caswell K, Wilson DM, Harris B, Clinton P, Kovatchev B, Buckingham BA. Remote glucose monitoring in cAMP setting reduces the risk of prolonged nocturnal hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jan;16(1):1–7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0139.
    1. Kaiserman K, Buckingham BA, Prakasam G, Gunville F, Slover RH, Wang Y, Nguyen X, Welsh JB. Acceptability and utility of the mySentry remote glucose monitoring system. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 01;7(2):356–61. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700211.
    1. Ly TT, Keenan DB, Roy A, Han J, Grosman B, Cantwell M, Kurtz N, von Eyben R, Clinton P, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA. Automated Overnight Closed-Loop Control Using a Proportional-Integral-Derivative Algorithm with Insulin Feedback in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Dec;18(6):377–84. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0431.
    1. Oron T, Farfel A, Muller I, Miller S, Atlas E, Nimri R, Phillip M. A remote monitoring system for artificial pancreas support is safe, reliable, and user friendly. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Nov;16(11):699–705. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0090.
    1. Peña NV, Torres M, Cardona JAC, Iniesta R. Impact of telemedicine assessment on glycemic variability in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):136–42. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0243.
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen J, Wilinska M, Thabit H, Stewart Z, Cheng P, Kollman C, Acerini C, Dunger D, Hovorka R. Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free-Living, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(7):1168–74. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2078. dc15-2078
    1. Malloy LE, Gingerich J, Olson MD, Atkins DL. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable devices in the pediatric population improves detection of adverse events. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):301–6. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0774-5.
    1. Zartner PA, Toussaint-Goetz N, Photiadis J, Wiebe W, Schneider MB. Telemonitoring with implantable electronic devices in young patients with congenital heart diseases. Europace. 2012 Jul;14(7):1030–7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur434.eur434
    1. Leshem-Rubinow E, Berger M, Shacham J, Birati EY, Malov N, Tamari M, Golovner M, Roth A. New real-time loop recorder diagnosis of symptomatic arrhythmia via telemedicine. Clin Cardiol. 2011 Jul;34(7):420–5. doi: 10.1002/clc.20906. doi: 10.1002/clc.20906.
    1. Leoni L, Padalino M, Biffanti R, Ferretto S, Vettor G, Corrado D, Stellin G, Milanesi O, Iliceto S. Pacemaker remote monitoring in the pediatric population: is it a real solution? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 May;38(5):565–71. doi: 10.1111/pace.12600.
    1. Garingo A, Friedlich P, Tesoriero L, Patil S, Jackson P, Seri I. The use of mobile robotic telemedicine technology in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2012 Jan;32(1):55–63. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.72.jp201172
    1. Rincon F, Vibbert M, Childs V, Fry R, Caliguri D, Urtecho J, Rosenwasser R, Jallo J. Implementation of a model of robotic tele-presence (RTP) in the neuro-ICU: effect on critical care nursing team satisfaction. Neurocrit Care. 2012 Aug;17(1):97–101. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9712-2.
    1. Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B, MacDorman MF. Annual summary of vital statistics--2003. Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):619–34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2695.115/3/619
    1. Rowell P, Pincus P, White M, Smith A. Telehealth in paediatric orthopaedic surgery in Queensland: a 10-year review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Dec;84(12):955–9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12753.
    1. Dharmar M, Kuppermann N, Romano PS, Yang NH, Nesbitt TS, Phan J, Nguyen C, Parsapour K, Marcin JP. Telemedicine consultations and medication errors in rural emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1090–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1374. peds.2013-1374
    1. McIntosh S, Cirillo D, Wood N, Dozier AM, Alarie C, McConnochie KM. Patient evaluation of an acute care pediatric telemedicine service in urban neighborhoods. Telemed J E Health. 2014 Dec;20(12):1121–6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0032.
    1. Aarts LAM, Jeanne V, Cleary JP, Lieber C, Nelson JS, Bambang Oetomo S, Verkruysse W. Non-contact heart rate monitoring utilizing camera photoplethysmography in the neonatal intensive care unit - a pilot study. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Dec;89(12):943–8. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.09.016.S0378-3782(13)00237-5
    1. Bal U. Non-contact estimation of heart rate and oxygen saturation using ambient light. Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Jan 01;6(1):86–97. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.000086. 86
    1. Carey P, Fudzulani R, Scholfield D, Chagaluka G, Tomoka T, Liombe G, Banda K, Wadehra V, Samarasinghe S, Molyneux EM, Bailey S. Remote and rapid pathological diagnosis in a resource challenged unit. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jun;67(6):540–3. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-202099.jclinpath-2013-202099

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj