Combination of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and standard immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia

Yang Lan, Fang Liu, Lixian Chang, Lipeng Liu, Yingchi Zhang, Meihui Yi, Yuli Cai, Jing Feng, Zhibo Han, Zhongchao Han, Xiaofan Zhu, Yang Lan, Fang Liu, Lixian Chang, Lipeng Liu, Yingchi Zhang, Meihui Yi, Yuli Cai, Jing Feng, Zhibo Han, Zhongchao Han, Xiaofan Zhu

Abstract

Background: Defects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in proliferation and differentiation are involved in the pathophysiology of aplastic anemia (AA). Infusion of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) may improve the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in childhood severe aplastic anemia (SAA).

Methods: We conducted an investigator-initiated, open-label, and prospective phase IV trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination of allogenic UC-MSCs and standard IST for pediatric patients with newly diagnosed SAA. In mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) group, UC-MSCs were injected intravenously at a dose of 1 × 106/kg per week starting on the 14th day after administration of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG), for a total of 3 weeks. The clinical outcomes and adverse events of patients with UC-MSCs infusion were assessed when compared with a concurrent control group in which patients received standard IST alone.

Results: Nine patients with a median age of 4 years were enrolled as the group with MSC, while the data of another 9 childhood SAA were analysed as the controls. Four (44%) patients in MSC group developed anaphylactic reactions which were associated with rabbit ATG. When compared with the controls, neither the improvement of blood cell counts, nor the change of T-lymphocytes after IST reached statistical significance in MSC group (both p > 0.05) and there were one (11%) patient in MSC group and two (22%) patients in the controls achieved partial response (PR) at 90 days after IST. After a median follow-up of 48 months, there was no clone evolution occurring in both groups. The 4-year estimated overall survival (OS) rate in two groups were both 88.9% ± 10.5%, while the 4-year estimated failure-free survival (FFS) rate in MSC group was lower than that in the controls (38.1% ± 17.2% vs. 66.7% ± 15.7%, p = 0.153).

Conclusions: Concomitant use of IST and UC-MSCs in SAA children is safe but may not necessarily improve the early response rate and long-term outcomes. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02218437 (registered October 2013).

Keywords: Child; Immunosuppressive therapy; Mesenchymal stem cell; Severe aplastic anemia; Umbilical cord.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Peripheral blood cells were quantified at baseline, at 40 days and 90 days after rabbit ATG in two treatment groups. a-d show the changes of absolute neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelet count and absolute reticulocyte count, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The percentage of CD3 + CD4+ T-cell lymphocytes (a), CD3 + CD8+ T-cell lymphocytes (b), and CD4 + CD25 + CD127dim regulatory T cells (c) in the peripheral blood of patients performed by means of flow cytometry at baseline and after treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The estimated failure-free survival (FFS) curves of patients between two groups

References

    1. Scheinberg P, Young NS. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia. Blood. 2012;120(6):1185–1196. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-274019.
    1. Young NS, Maciejewski J. The pathophysiology of acquired aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(19):1365–1372. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705083361906.
    1. Young NS, Calado RT, Scheinberg P. Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia. Blood. 2006;108(8):2509–2519. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-010777.
    1. Solomou EE, Rezvani K, Mielke S, Malide D, Keyvanfar K, Visconte V, et al. Deficient CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ T regulatory cells in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood. 2007;110(5):1603–1606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-066258.
    1. Kordasti S, Marsh J, Al-Khan S, Jiang J, Smith A, Mohamedali A, et al. Functional characterization of CD4+ T cells in aplastic anemia. Blood. 2012;119(9):2033–2043. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-368308.
    1. Shi J, Ge M, Lu S, Li X, Shao Y, Huang J, et al. Intrinsic impairment of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood. 2012;120(8):1624–1632. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-390708.
    1. Dezern AE, Brodsky RA. Clinical management of aplastic anemia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2011;4(2):221–230. doi: 10.1586/ehm.11.11.
    1. Scheinberg P. Aplastic anemia: therapeutic updates in immunosuppression and transplantation. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:292–300. doi: 10.1182/asheducation.V2012.1.292.3798310.
    1. Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, et al. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005;7(5):393–395. doi: 10.1080/14653240500319234.
    1. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905.
    1. Dexter TM. Stromal cell associated haemopoiesis. J Cell Physiol Suppl. 1982;1:87–94. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041130414.
    1. Le Blanc K, Mougiakakos D. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(5):383–396. doi: 10.1038/nri3209.
    1. Menabde G, Gogilashvili K, Kakabadze Z, Berishvili E. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell plasticity and their application perspectives. Georgian Med News. 2009;167:71–76.
    1. Kerkis I, Kerkis A, Dozortsev D, Stukart-Parsons GC, Gomes Massironi SM, Pereira LV, et al. Isolation and characterization of a population of immature dental pulp stem cells expressing OCT-4 and other embryonic stem cell markers. Cells Tissues Organs. 2006;184(3-4):105–116. doi: 10.1159/000099617.
    1. In’t Anker PS, Scherjon SA, Kleijburg-van der Keur C, Noort WA, Claas FH, Willemze R, et al. Amniotic fluid as a novel source of mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic transplantation. Blood. 2003;102(4):1548–1549. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1291.
    1. Lu LL, Liu YJ, Yang SG, Zhao QJ, Wang X, Gong W, et al. Isolation and characterization of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoiesis-supportive function and other potentials. Haematologica. 2006;91(8):1017–1026.
    1. Chao YH, Peng CT, Harn HJ, Chan CK, Wu KH. Poor potential of proliferation and differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from children with severe aplastic anemia. Ann Hematol. 2010;89(7):715–723. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0892-6.
    1. Xiao Y, Jiang Z-J, Pang Y, Li L, Gao Y, Xiao H-W, et al. Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stromal cell treatment from related donors for patients with refractory aplastic anemia. Cytotherapy. 2013;15(7):760–766. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.03.007.
    1. Pang Y, Xiao H-W, Zhang H, Liu Z-H, Li L, Gao Y, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells expanded in vitro for treatment of aplastic anemia: a multicenter phase II trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(7):1569–1575. doi: 10.1002/sctm.16-0227.
    1. Camitta BM, Rappeport JM, Parkman R, Nathan DG. Selection of patients for bone marrow transplantation in severe aplastic anemia. Blood. 1975;45(3):355–363. doi: 10.1182/blood.V45.3.355.355.
    1. Bacigalupo A, Hows J, Gluckman E, Nissen C, Marsh J, Van Lint MT, et al. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) versus immunosuppression for the treatment of severe aplastic anaemia (SAA): a report of the EBMT SAA working party. Br J Haematol. 1988;70(2):177–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1988.tb02460.x.
    1. Subspecialty Group of H, Society of P, Chinese Medical Association The Editorial B, Chinese Journal of P Recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of acquired aplastic anemia in children. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014;52(2):103–106.
    1. Zeng Y, Katsanis E. The complex pathophysiology of acquired aplastic anaemia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;180(3):361–370. doi: 10.1111/cei.12605.
    1. Fang B, Song Y, Li N, Li J, Zhao RC. Cotransplantation of haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells to reduce the risk of graft failure in a patient with refractory severe aplastic anemia. Acta Haematol. 2008;119(3):162–165. doi: 10.1159/000134015.
    1. Jaganathan BG, Tisato V, Vulliamy T, Dokal I, Marsh J, Dazzi F, et al. Effects of MSC co-injection on the reconstitution of aplastic anemia patient following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2010;24(10):1791–1795. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.164.
    1. Wu Y, Cao Y, Li X, Xu L, Wang Z, Liu P, et al. Cotransplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for severe aplastic anemia: successful engraftment and mild GVHD. Stem Cell Res. 2014;12(1):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.10.001.
    1. Clé DV, Santana-Lemos B, Tellechea MF, Prata KL, Orellana MD, Covas DT, et al. Intravenous infusion of allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells in refractory or relapsed aplastic anemia. Cytotherapy. 2015;17(12):1696–1705. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.09.006.
    1. Rao MS, Mattson MP. Stem cells and aging: expanding the possibilities. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122(7):713–734. doi: 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00224-X.
    1. Wang Y, Han Z-B, Song Y-P, Han ZC. Safety of mesenchymal stem cells for clinical application. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:652034. doi: 10.1155/2012/652034.
    1. Rosenfeld S, Follmann D, Nunez O, Young NS. Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for severe aplastic anemia: association between hematologic response and long-term outcome. JAMA. 2003;289(9):1130–1135. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1130.
    1. Zangi L, Margalit R, Reich-Zeliger S, Bachar-Lustig E, Beilhack A, Negrin R, et al. Direct imaging of immune rejection and memory induction by allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(11):2865–2874. doi: 10.1002/stem.217.
    1. Ankrum JA, Ong JF, Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: immune evasive, not immune privileged. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(3):252–260. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2816.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj