A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Min Liu, Zhiguang Zhou, Jinhua Yan, Pin Li, Wenhui Song, Junfen Fu, Xiaobo Chen, Weigang Zhao, Li Xi, Xiaoping Luo, Liang Sha, Xueyuan Deng, Chunxiu Gong, Min Liu, Zhiguang Zhou, Jinhua Yan, Pin Li, Wenhui Song, Junfen Fu, Xiaobo Chen, Weigang Zhao, Li Xi, Xiaoping Luo, Liang Sha, Xueyuan Deng, Chunxiu Gong

Abstract

Background: We aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of insulin glargine in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin was the reference therapy.

Methods: This open-label, randomised, Phase III study was conducted at 10 sites in China. Children aged ≥6 to <18 years with T1DM were randomised (2:1) to insulin glargine or NPH insulin asbasal insulinfor a 24-week treatment period. For all patients, insulin aspart was given as bolus insulin. The primary endpoint was absolute change in glycated haemoglobin(HbA1c) from baseline to Week 24. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <7.5% (<58.5 mmol/mol), and safety. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01223131).

Results: In total,196 patients were screened, and 162 were randomised (107 and 55 patients were randomised to insulin glargine and NPH insulin, respectively). The mean ± SD of absolute change in HbA1c was-0.25 ± 1.68% (-2.69 ± 18.32 mmol/mol) in the insulin glargine group and -0.54 ± 1.67% (-5.55 ± 20.32 mmol/mol) in the NPH insulin group. At Week 24, 18.7 and 21.6% of patients in the insulin glargine and NPH insulin groups achieved HbA1c <7.5% (<58.5 mmol/mol). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. A numerically lower rate of symptomatic hypoglycaemia per patient year was observed for insulin glargine versus NPH insulin (24.3 ± 45.8 versus32.3 ± 43.2); severe hypoglycaemia was rare (<2%).

Conclusions: Initiation of insulin glargine can aid Chinese paediatric patients with T1DM to safely reduce their HbA1c levels.

Keywords: Chinese paediatric patients; Insulin glargine; NPH insulin; Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow diagram.*Patients could be excluded for more than one reason.†Serum creatinine > 177 μmol/l (2.0 mg/dl); serum alanine amino transferase or aspartate amino transferase > 3 times upper limit of normal for the patient’s age and gender; haemoglobin <10 g/dl (100 g/l) and/or neutrophils < 1500/mm3 (1.5 × 109/l) and/or platelets < 100,000/mm3 (100 × 109/l).cThreepatients had no post-baseline HbA1c assessment and were not included in the HbA1c analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Variation in study variables over the 24-week study window for the mITT population. a Mean HbA1c (%). The analysis excluded measurements obtained >14 days after treatment cessation and for Week 24 (LOCF), the analysis included measurements obtained ≤14 days after the last dose of study medication. b Mean fasting blood glucose (mmol/l). The analysis excluded measurements obtained >1 day after treatment cessation. c Mean nocturnal blood glucose (mmol/l). The analysis excluded measurements obtained >1 day after treatment cessation. d Mean eight-point SMBG (mmol/l). Error bars represent the standard deviation. LOCF, last observation carried forward; SMBG, self-measured blood glucose

References

    1. Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, Imperatore G, Linder B, Divers J, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA. 2014;311:1778–1786. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3201.
    1. Tuomilehto J. The emerging global epidemic of type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2013;13:795–804. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0433-5.
    1. Gong CX, Wei LY, Wu D, Cao BY, Meng X, Wang LL. Effectiveness of multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in clinical practice. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:526591.
    1. Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:174–183. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040832.
    1. Lantus® (insulin glargine injection) Summary of Product Characteristics; Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH. 2015.
    1. Lantus® (insulin glargine [rDNA origin] injection) Prescribing Information; Sanofi-Aventis U.S LLC. December 2013.
    1. Singh SR, Ahmad F, Lal A, Yu C, Bai Z, Bennett H. Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2009;180:385–397. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081041.
    1. Paivarinta M, Tapanainen P, Veijola R. Basal insulin switch from NPH to glargine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9:83–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2007.00341.x.
    1. Bangstad HJ, Danne T, Deeb L, Jarosz-Chobot P, Urakami T, Hanas R. Insulin treatment in children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009;10(Suppl 12):82–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00578.x.
    1. Murphy NP, Keane SM, Ong KK, Ford-Adams M, Edge JA, Acerini CL, et al. Randomized cross-over trial of insulin glargine plus lispro or NPH insulin plus regular human insulin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin regimens. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:799–804. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.799.
    1. Schober E, Schoenle E, Van DJ, Wernicke-Panten K. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2002;15:369–376. doi: 10.1515/JPEM.2002.15.4.369.
    1. White NH, Chase HP, Arslanian S, Tamborlane WV. Comparison of glycemic variability associated with insulin glargine and intermediate-acting insulin when used as the basal component of multiple daily injections for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:387–393. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0800.
    1. Mohn A, Strang S, Wernicke-Panten K, Lang AM, Edge JA, Dunger DB. Nocturnal glucose control and free insulin levels in children with type 1 diabetes by use of the long-acting insulin HOE 901 as part of a three-injection regimen. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:557–559. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.4.557a.
    1. Garg S, Moser E, Dain MP, Rodionova A. Clinical experience with insulin glargine in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:835–846. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0135.
    1. Mavrogiannaki AN, Migdalis IN. Long-acting basal insulin analogs: latest developments and clinical usefulness. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2012;3:249–257. doi: 10.1177/2040622312454158.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Straume M, Cox DJ, Farhy LS. Risk analysis of blood glucose data: a quantitative approach to optimizing the control of insulin dependent diabetes. J Theor Med. 2000;3:1–10. doi: 10.1080/10273660008833060.
    1. Chinese Diabetes Society. Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in China..
    1. Sartore G, Chilelli NC, Burlina S, Di SP, Piarulli F, Fedele D, et al. The importance of HbA1c and glucose variability in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: outcome of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Acta Diabetol. 2012;49(Suppl 1):S153–S160. doi: 10.1007/s00592-012-0391-4.
    1. Chase HP, Arslanian S, White NH, Tamborlane WV. Insulin Glargine Versus Intermediate-Acting Insulin as the Basal Component of Multiple Daily Injection Regimens for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Pediatr. 2008;153:547–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.063.
    1. Hassan K, Rodriguez LM, Johnson SE, Tadlock S, Heptulla RA. A randomized, controlled trial comparing twice-a-day insulin glargine mixed with rapid-acting insulin analogs versus standard neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) therapy in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e466–e472. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1679.
    1. Mianowska B, Szadkowska A, Czerniawska E, Pietrzak I, Bodalski J. Insulin glargine improves fasting blood glucose levels in prepubertal children with unsatisfactorily controlled type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2007;13:189–193.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj