Investigating emotion regulation and social information processing as mechanisms linking adverse childhood experiences with psychosocial functioning in young swiss adults: the FACE epidemiological accelerated cohort study

Jeannette Brodbeck, Salome I R Bötschi, Neela Vetsch, Thomas Berger, Stefanie J Schmidt, Simon Marmet, Jeannette Brodbeck, Salome I R Bötschi, Neela Vetsch, Thomas Berger, Stefanie J Schmidt, Simon Marmet

Abstract

Background: Adverse childhood experiences increase the risk for psychological disorders and lower psychosocial functioning across the lifespan. However, less is known about the processes through which ACE are linked to multiple negative outcomes. The aim of the FACE epidemiological study is to investigate emotion regulation (emotional reactivity, perseverative thinking and self-efficacy for managing emotions) and social information processing (rejection sensitivity, interpretation biases and social understanding) as potential mechanisms linking adverse childhood experiences and psychosocial functioning in a large population sample of young adults. It is embedded in a larger project that also includes an ecological momentary assessment of emotion regulation and social information processing and informs the development and evaluation of an online self-help intervention for young adults with a history of ACE.

Methods: The study plans to recruit 5000 young adults aged 18 to 21 from the German-speaking Swiss population. Addresses are provided by Swiss Federal Statistical Office and participants are invited by mail to complete a self-report online survey. If the targeted sample size will not be reached, a second additional sample will be recruited via educational facilities such as universities or teacher training colleges or military training schools. Three follow-ups are planned after 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, resulting in ages 18-24 being covered. The main exposure variable is self-reported adverse childhood experiences before the age of 18, measured at the baseline. Primary outcomes are psychosocial functioning across the study period. Secondary outcomes are social information processing, emotion regulation and health care service use. Statistical analyses include a range of latent variable models to identify patterns of adverse childhood experiences and patterns and trajectories of psychosocial adaptation.

Discussion: The results will contribute to the understanding of the underlying mechanisms that link ACE with psychosocial functioning which is crucial for an improved insight into risk and resilience processes and for tailoring interventions. Furthermore, the identification of factors that facilitate or hinder service use among young adults with ACE informs healthcare policies and the provision of appropriate healthcare services.

Trial registration number: NCT05122988. The study was reviewed and authorized by the ethical committee of Northwestern and Central Switzerland (BASEC number 2021-01204).

Keywords: Adverse childhood experiences; Emotion regulation; Interpretation bias; Psychosocial functioning; Rejection sensitivity; Service use; Social support; Young adulthood.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the Integrated Model of Emotion Regulation and Social Information Processing in the Aftermath of ACE
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the subprojects and their role in the FACE project

References

    1. Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Alink LR, et al. The prevalence of child maltreatment across the globe: review of a series of meta-analyses. Child Abuse Rev. 2015;24:37–50. doi: 10.1002/car.2353.
    1. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, et al. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet. 2009;373:68–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7.
    1. Kisely S, Abajobir AA, Mills R, et al. Child maltreatment and mental health problems in adulthood: birth cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;213:698–703. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.207.
    1. Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, et al. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349.
    1. McMahon TJ. Child maltreatment and emerging adulthood: past, present, and future. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014.
    1. Steinberg L, Icenogle G, Shulman EP, et al. Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Dev Sci. 2018;21:e12532. doi: 10.1111/desc.12532.
    1. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55:469. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.
    1. Eccles J, Templeton J, Barber B, Stone M. Adolescence and emerging adulthood: the critical passage ways to adulthood. In: Bornstein MH, Davidson L, Keyes CLM, Moore KA, editors. Well-being: positive development across the life course. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2003. pp. 383–406.
    1. Cloitre M, Khan C, Mackintosh M-A, et al. Emotion regulation mediates the relationship between ACES and physical and mental health. Psychol Trauma Theory Res Pract Policy. 2019;11:82. doi: 10.1037/tra0000374.
    1. McLaughlin KA, Sheridan MA. Beyond cumulative risk: a dimensional approach to childhood adversity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016;25:239–245. doi: 10.1177/0963721416655883.
    1. McLaughlin KA. Future directions in childhood adversity and youth psychopathology. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45:361–382. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1110823.
    1. McLaughlin KA, Colich NL, Rodman AM, et al. Mechanisms linking childhood trauma exposure and psychopathology: a transdiagnostic model of risk and resilience. BMC Med. 2020;18:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01561-6.
    1. McLaughlin KA, DeCross SN, Jovanovic T, et al. Mechanisms linking childhood adversity with psychopathology: learning as an intervention target. Behav Res Ther. 2019;118:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.04.008.
    1. Kim J, Cicchetti D. Longitudinal pathways linking child maltreatment, emotion regulation, peer relations, and psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51:706–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02202.x.
    1. Jennissen S, Holl J, Mai H, et al. Emotion dysregulation mediates the relationship between child maltreatment and psychopathology: a structural equation model. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;62:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.015.
    1. Weissman DG, Bitran D, Miller AB, et al. Difficulties with emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic mechanism linking child maltreatment with the emergence of psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2019;31:899–915. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000348.
    1. Hong F, Tarullo AR, Mercurio AE, et al. Childhood maltreatment and perceived stress in young adults: the role of emotion regulation strategies, self-efficacy, and resilience. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;86:136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.014.
    1. Titelius EN, Cook E, Spas J, et al. Emotion dysregulation mediates the relationship between child maltreatment and non-suicidal self-injury. J Aggress Maltreatment Trauma. 2018;27:323–331. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2017.1338814.
    1. Villalta L, Smith P, Hickin N, et al. Emotion regulation difficulties in traumatized youth: a meta-analysis and conceptual review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;27:527–544. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1105-4.
    1. Heleniak C, Jenness JL, Vander Stoep A, et al. Childhood maltreatment exposure and disruptions in emotion regulation: a transdiagnostic pathway to adolescent internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Cogn Ther Res. 2016;40:394–415. doi: 10.1007/s10608-015-9735-z.
    1. Bowlby J. A secure base. Routledge; 2012.
    1. Howe D. Child abuse and neglect: attachment, development and intervention. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
    1. Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Guthrie IK, et al. Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78:136. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.136.
    1. Rothbart MK, Ahadi SA, Hershey KL. Temperament and social behavior in childhood. Merrill-Palmer Q 1982- 1994;40:21–39.
    1. Massing-Schaffer M, Liu RT, Kraines MA, et al. Elucidating the relation between childhood emotional abuse and depressive symptoms in adulthood: the mediating role of maladaptive interpersonal processes. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;74:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.045.
    1. Hernandez EM, Trout ZM, Liu RT. Vulnerability-specific stress generation: childhood emotional abuse and the mediating role of depressogenic interpersonal processes. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;62:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.019.
    1. Luke N, Banerjee R. Differentiated associations between childhood maltreatment experiences and social understanding: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dev Rev. 2013;33:1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.10.001.
    1. Normansell KM, Wisco BE. Negative interpretation bias as a mechanism of the relationship between rejection sensitivity and depressive symptoms. Cogn Emot. 2017;31:950–962. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1185395.
    1. Pollak SD. Multilevel developmental approaches to understanding the effects of child maltreatment: recent advances and future challenges. Dev Psychopathol. 2015;27:1387–1397. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000826.
    1. Cicchetti D. Socioemotional, personality, and biological development: illustrations from a multilevel developmental psychopathology perspective on child maltreatment. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:187–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033259.
    1. Germine L, Dunn EC, McLaughlin KA, et al. Childhood adversity is associated with adult theory of mind and social affiliation, but not face processing. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0129612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129612.
    1. Sheikh MA. Childhood physical maltreatment, perceived social isolation, and internalizing symptoms: a longitudinal, three-wave, population-based study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;27:481–491. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1090-z.
    1. Sperry DM, Widom CS. Child abuse and neglect, social support, and psychopathology in adulthood: a prospective investigation. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37:415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.02.006.
    1. Sheikh MA. The potential protective effect of friendship on the association between childhood adversity and psychological distress in adulthood: a retrospective, preliminary, three-wave population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2018;226:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.015.
    1. Shevlin M, McElroy E, Murphy J. Loneliness mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and adult psychopathology: evidence from the adult psychiatric morbidity survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50:591–601. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0951-8.
    1. Arslan G. Psychological maltreatment, social acceptance, social connectedness, and subjective well-being in adolescents. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:983–1001. doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9856-z.
    1. Lagdon S, Ross J, Robinson M, et al. Assessing the mediating role of social support in childhood maltreatment and psychopathology among college students in Northern Ireland. J Interpers Violence. 2021;36:NP2112–2136. doi: 10.1177/0886260518755489.
    1. Wang PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, et al. Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys. Lancet. 2007;370:841–850. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61414-7.
    1. Lemerise EA, Arsenio WF. An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Dev. 2000;71:107–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00124.
    1. Gabrielli J, Jackson Y. Innovative methodological and statistical approaches to the study of child maltreatment: Introduction. Child Abuse Negl. 2019;87:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.001.
    1. Collishaw S, Hammerton G, Mahedy L, et al. Mental health resilience in the adolescent offspring of parents with depression: a prospective longitudinal study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:49–57. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00358-2.
    1. Miller-Lewis LR, Searle AK, Sawyer MG, et al. Resource factors for mental health resilience in early childhood: an analysis with multiple methodologies. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2013;7:1–23. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-7-6.
    1. Masten AS, Wright MO. Resilience over the lifespan: developmental perspectives on resistance, recovery, and transformation. In: Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Hall JS, editors. Handbook of adult resilience. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010. pp. 212–237.
    1. Bonanno GA, Diminich ED. Annual research review: positive adjustment to adversity–trajectories of minimal–impact resilience and emergent resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54:378–401. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12021.
    1. Diekmann A, Jann B. Anreizformen und Ausschöpfungsquoten bei postalischen Befragungen: eine Prüfung der Reziprozitätshypothese. Zuma Nachrichten. 2001;25:18–27.
    1. Edwards P, Cooper R, Roberts I, et al. Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:987–999. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.034397.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
    1. Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, et al. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27:169–190. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0.
    1. Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, et al. Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2011;108:287.
    1. Isele D, Teicher MH, Ruf-Leuschner M, et al. KERF–ein Instrument zur umfassenden Ermittlung belastender Kindheitserfahrungen. [KERF – an instrument for a comprehensive assessment of adverse childhood experiences] Z Für Klin Psychol Psychother. 2014;43:121–30.
    1. Teicher MH, Parigger A. The ‘Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure’(MACE) scale for the retrospective assessment of abuse and neglect during development. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117423.
    1. . . Accessed 11 Oct 2021.
    1. Abbott RA, Ploubidis GB, Huppert FA, et al. An evaluation of the precision of measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a population sample. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97:357–373. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9506-x.
    1. Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69:719. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.
    1. Staudinger U. Psychological Well-Being Scales Ryff 1989 - Deutsche Übersetzung für Forschungszwecke. 1990.
    1. Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49:71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
    1. Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehler E, et al. The German version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011;27:127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058.
    1. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, et al. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:461–464. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.5.461.
    1. Spitzer C, Hammer S, Löwe B, et al. The short version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): preliminary psychometric properties of the German translation. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2011;79:517–523. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281602.
    1. Renshaw TL, Cook CR. Preliminary psychometrics of responses to the Youth Externalizing Problems Screener. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2019;37:1016–1022. doi: 10.1177/0734282918809814.
    1. Brodbeck J, Matter M, Page J, et al. Motives for cannabis use as a moderator variable of distress among young adults. Addict Behav. 2007;32:1537–1545. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.012.
    1. Glaesmer H, Kapusta ND, Teismann T, et al. Psychometrische eigenschaften der deutschen version des suicide behaviors questionnaire revised (SBQ-R) PPmP-Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018;68:346–352. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118335.
    1. Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM, et al. The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment. 2001;8:443–454. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800409.
    1. Schluter MG, Hodgins DC, Wolfe J, et al. Can one simple questionnaire assess substance-related and behavioural addiction problems? Results of a proposed new screener for community epidemiology. Addiction. 2018;113:1528–1537. doi: 10.1111/add.14166.
    1. Nock MK, Wedig MM, Holmberg EB, et al. The emotion reactivity scale: development, evaluation, and relation to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors. Behav Ther. 2008;39:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2007.05.005.
    1. Ehring T, Zetsche U, Weidacker K, et al. The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.003.
    1. PROMIS Project. 2021.. Accessed 11 Oct 2021.
    1. Berenson KR, Gyurak A, Ayduk Ö, et al. Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. J Res Personal. 2009;43:1064–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.007.
    1. Staebler K, Helbing E, Rosenbach C, et al. Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18:275–283. doi: 10.1002/cpp.705.
    1. Dillon KH, Allan NP, Cougle JR, et al. Measuring hostile interpretation bias: the WSAP-hostility scale. Assessment. 2016;23:707–719. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599052.
    1. Boffa JW, Norr AM, Tock JL, et al. Development of the interpretation bias index for PTSD. Cogn Ther Res. 2018;42:720–734. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9915-8.
    1. Silvera D, Martinussen M, Dahl TI. The Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scand J Psychol. 2001;42:313–319. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00242.
    1. Fydrich T, Sommer G, Tydecks S, et al. Fragebogen zur sozialen unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14) Z Für Med Psychol. 2009;18:43–48.
    1. Soper DS. A-priori Sample Size for Structural Equation Models [Software]. 2022. . Accessed 27 Jan 2022.
    1. Maas CJ, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. 2005;1:86–92. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.
    1. Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Multiple imputation with Mplus. MPlus Web Notes. 2010;29:238–246.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj