Effect of age of infusion site and type of rapid-acting analog on pharmacodynamic parameters of insulin boluses in youth with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin pump therapy

Karena L Swan, James D Dziura, Garry M Steil, Gayane R Voskanyan, Kristin A Sikes, Amy T Steffen, Melody L Martin, William V Tamborlane, Stuart A Weinzimer, Karena L Swan, James D Dziura, Garry M Steil, Gayane R Voskanyan, Kristin A Sikes, Amy T Steffen, Melody L Martin, William V Tamborlane, Stuart A Weinzimer

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of type of insulin analog and age of insertion site on the pharmacodynamic characteristics of a standard insulin bolus in youth with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin pump therapy.

Research design and methods: Seventeen insulin pump-treated adolescents with type 1 diabetes underwent two euglycemic clamp procedures after a 0.2 unit/kg bolus of either insulin aspart or lispro on day 1 and day 4 of insulin pump site insertion. The glucose infusion rate (GIR) required to maintain euglycemia was the primary pharmacodynamic measure.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in any of the pharmacodynamic parameters between aspart and lispro during day 1 and day 4. However, when the two groups were combined, time to discontinuation of exogenous glucose infusion, and time to half-maximal onset and offset of insulin action were observed significantly earlier during day 4 compared with day 1 (P = 0.03-0.0004), but the overall area under the GIR curve was similar on day 1 and day 4.

Conclusions: With both insulin aspart and lispro, there is an earlier peak and shorter duration of action with increasing duration of infusion site use, but overall insulin action is not affected.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pharmacodynamic profiles. Insulin action, as expressed as GIR, required to maintain euglycemia after a standard bolus of 0.2 unit/kg insulin aspart or lispro. Data are presented as means ± SEM. A: Day 1 of catheter site insertion. B: Day 4 of catheter site insertion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pharmacodynamic profiles for all subjects on day 1 versus day 4 of catheter site insertion. Insulin action, as expressed as GIR, required to maintain euglycemia after a standard bolus of 0.2 unit/kg insulin aspart or lispro. Data are presented as means ± SEM.

References

    1. DCCT Research Group: The effects of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. N Engl J Med 329:977–986, 1993
    1. The DCCT Research Group: The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr 125:177–188, 1994
    1. DCCT/EDIC Research Group: Prolonged beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: microvascular outcomes four years after conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Pediatrics 139:804–812, 2001
    1. Zinman B, Tildesley H, Chiasson TJ, Tsue E, Strack T: Insulin lispro in CSII: results of a double-blind crossover study. Diabetes 46:440–443, 1997
    1. Howey DC, Bowsher RR, Brunelle RL, Woodworth JR: [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)] human insulin: a rapidly absorbed analogue of human insulin. Diabetes 43:396–402, 1994
    1. Mudaliar S, Lindberg FA, Joyce M, Beerdsen P, Strange P, Lin A, Henry RR: Insulin aspart (B28 Asp-insulin): a fast acting analog of human insulin: absorption kinetics and action profile compared with regular human insulin in healthy nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 22:1501–1506, 1999
    1. Becker RHA, Frick A, Wessels D, Scholtz H: Evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of insulin glulisine—a novel, rapid-acting, human insulin analogue (Abstract). Diabetologia 46:775, 2003
    1. Becker RHA, Frick AD, Kapitza C, Heise T, Rave K: Pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of insulin glulisine (GLU) versus insulin lispro (IL) and regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 53(Suppl. 2):503, 2004
    1. Danne T, Becker RHA, Heise T, Bittner C, Frick AD, Rave K: Pharmacokinetics, prandial glucose control, and safety of insulin glulisine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28:2100–2105, 2005
    1. Swan KL, Weinzimer SA, Steil G, Voskanyan G, Steffen A, Martin M, Tamborlane WV: Effect of puberty on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin pump therapy in youth with TIDM. Diabetes Care 31:44–46, 2008
    1. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R: Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 237:E214–E223, 1979

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj