Results of a phase I trial to assess the safety of macitentan in combination with temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma

Shiao-Pei Weathers, Julie Rood-Breithaupt, John de Groot, Gail Thomas, Marianna Manfrini, Marta Penas-Prado, Vinay K Puduvalli, Christian Zwingelstein, W K Alfred Yung, Shiao-Pei Weathers, Julie Rood-Breithaupt, John de Groot, Gail Thomas, Marianna Manfrini, Marta Penas-Prado, Vinay K Puduvalli, Christian Zwingelstein, W K Alfred Yung

Abstract

Background: There is an urgent need for additional therapies to treat recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Preclinical studies suggest that high dose macitentan, an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist, enhances the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide (TMZ) in GBM, improving survival. This phase I trial investigated the maximum tolerated dose of macitentan combined with TMZ in patients with recurrent GBM and assessed the safety and tolerability of high dose macitentan in these patients (NCT01499251).

Methods: Adults with recurrent GBM received ascending doses of macitentan from 30 mg once daily concomitantly with TMZ. Safety and tolerability were assessed in addition to exploratory efficacy and pharmacokinetic endpoints. An ancillary study examined biomarker expression following macitentan treatment prior to surgical resection of recurrent GBM.

Results: Thirty-eight patients with recurrent GBM were administered macitentan doses up to 300 mg once daily; no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and a maximum tolerated dose was not determined. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), the majority associated with GBM or TMZ treatment. TEAEs related to macitentan and TMZ were reported for 16 (42.1%) and 26 (68.4%) patients, respectively, with no serious macitentan-related TEAEs. Macitentan concentrations increased with dose, with no plateau in exposure. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the expression of efficacy biomarkers within tumors. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival across all dose groups was 9.4 (95% CI 8.5, 13.4) months.

Conclusion: High-dose macitentan was well tolerated in recurrent GBM patients concomitantly receiving TMZ. TEAEs were consistent with those seen in patients receiving either drug individually.

Keywords: glioblastoma; macitentan; phase I; recurrent; temozolomide.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design. The phase I dose escalation period followed a conventional 3+3 dose escalation design (Supplementary methods). A 30-day follow-up period following discontinuation of the study treatment was included for assessment of adverse events/serious adverse events, vital signs, physical examination and concomitant medications. Dose adjustments of TMZ were permitted if required. *End of treatment occurred if study treatment was discontinued due to disease progression, death or for another reason. **Assessment of an additional dose was planned but not completed due to early termination. †Macitentan was stopped 1-day prior to surgery and restarted 3–5 weeks post-surgery. DLT: Dose-limiting toxicity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient disposition. The phase Ib study included 9 patients receiving 150 mg macitentan who were in the phase I dose escalation study and 6 additional patients that were not included in the phase I dose escalation study. Thirty-six patients discontinued study treatment before completing 12 cycles of treatment; 89.5% of early discontinuations were due to progressive disease. †1 patient in the 120 mg group and 3 patients in the 150 mg group were replaced due to incorrect treatment (Supplementary methods). Patients were contacted every 3 months until the end of the study to assess vital status.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Macitentan and ACT-132577 plasma concentrations over 24 hours at steady state in the recurrent GBM patient population. (a) 24-hour PK profile for plasma macitentan concentrations after 150 mg macitentan at Day 14. N = 6 at each timepoint except N = 5 at 24 h. (b) 24-hour PK profile for plasma ACT-132577 concentrations after 150 mg macitentan at Day 14. N = 6 at each timepoint, except N = 5 at 24h. Data at each timepoint are mean ± SD.

References

    1. Polivka J, Holubec L, Kubikova T, et al. . Advances in experimental targeted therapy and immunotherapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(1):21–33.
    1. Weller M, Cloughesy T, Perry JR, Wick W. Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma–are we there yet? Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(1):4–27.
    1. Alifieris C, Trafalis DT. Glioblastoma multiforme: pathogenesis and treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2015;152:63–82.
    1. Weller M, van den Bent M, Tonn JC, et al. . European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):e315–e329.
    1. Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R. FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Oncologist. 2009;14(11):1131–1138.
    1. Weller M, Le Rhun E. How did lomustine become standard of care in recurrent glioblastoma? Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;87:102029.
    1. Nagane M. Dose-dense temozolomide: is it still promising? Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55Suppl 1:38–49.
    1. Vasaikar S, Tsipras G, Landázuri N, et al. . Overexpression of endothelin B receptor in glioblastoma: a prognostic marker and therapeutic target? BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):154.
    1. Egidy G, Eberl LP, Valdenaire O, et al. . The endothelin system in human glioblastoma. Lab Invest. 2000;80(11):1681–1689.
    1. Bagnato A, Rosanò L. The endothelin axis in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(8):1443–1451.
    1. Opsumit® (macitentan). Full Prescribing Information. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. March. Updated 2019.
    1. Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Kim MS, et al. . Macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in combination with Temozolomide Leads to Glioblastoma regression and long-term survival in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(20):4630–4641.
    1. Kim SJ, Kim JS, Kim SW, et al. . Macitentan (ACT-064992), a tissue-targeting endothelin receptor antagonist, enhances therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel by modulating survival pathways in orthotopic models of metastatic human ovarian cancer. Neoplasia. 2011;13(2):167–179.
    1. Sidharta PN, van Giersbergen PL, Dingemanse J. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in an ascending multiple-dose study in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(11):1131–1138.
    1. Sidharta PN, van Giersbergen PL, Halabi A, Dingemanse J. Macitentan: entry-into-humans study with a new endothelin receptor antagonist. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(10):977–984.
    1. Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al. . Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 2003;88(7):1004–1011.
    1. Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(10):708–720.
    1. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8(7):1277–1280.
    1. Merck & Co. Temozolomide product information. . Updated October 2017.
    1. Colman H. Future directions in glioblastoma therapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book . 2012:108–111. doi:10.14694/EdBook_AM.2012.32.108
    1. Wick W, Gorlia T, Bendszus M, et al. . Lomustine and bevacizumab in progressive glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(20):1954–1963.
    1. Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, et al. . Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3212–3218.
    1. Pollock DM, Boesen EI, Black SM. Does targeting the lipophilic milieu provide advantages for an endothelin antagonist? Mol Interv. 2009;9(2):75–78.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj