Pulse oximetry, severe retinopathy, and outcome at one year in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation

W Tin, D W Milligan, P Pennefather, E Hey, W Tin, D W Milligan, P Pennefather, E Hey

Abstract

Aim: To determine whether differing policies with regard to the control of oxygen saturation have any impact on the number of babies who develop retinopathy of prematurity and the number surviving with or without signs of cerebral palsy at one year.

Methods: An examination of the case notes of all the 295 babies who survived infancy after delivery before 28 weeks gestation in the north of England in 1990-1994.

Results: Babies given enough supplemental oxygen to maintain an oxygen saturation of 88-98%, as measured by pulse oximetry, for at least the first 8 weeks of life developed retinopathy of prematurity severe enough to be treated with cryotherapy four times as often as babies only given enough oxygen to maintain an oxygen saturation of 70-90% (27.2% v 6.2%). Surviving babies were also ventilated longer (31.4 v 13.9 days), more likely to be in oxygen at a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks (46% v 18 %), and more likely to have a weight below the third centile at discharge (45% v 17%). There was no difference in the proportion who survived infancy (53% v 52%) or who later developed cerebral palsy (17% v 15%). The lowest incidence of retinopathy in the study was associated with a policy that made little use of arterial lines.

Conclusions: Attempts to keep oxygen saturation at a normal "physiological" level may do more harm than good in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation.

References

    1. Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):295-310
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999 Mar;80(2):F93-8
    1. J Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Aug;35(4):355-7
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1966 Jan;55(1):85-7
    1. Pediatrics. 1980 Mar;65(3):536-40
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1982 Oct;136(10):892-5
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1987 Sep;141(9):992-5
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Sep;62(9):957-8
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1989 Mar;143(3):357-60
    1. Pediatrics. 1989 Aug;84(2):226-30
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Feb;144(2):141-2
    1. Clin Perinatol. 1991 Sep;18(3):441-72
    1. N Engl J Med. 1992 Apr 16;326(16):1050-4
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Jul;67(7 Spec No):860-7
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993 Mar;231(3):151-6
    1. J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):620-6
    1. Lancet. 1993 Jul 24;342(8865):193-8
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Oct;152(10):833-6
    1. Pediatrics. 1994 May;93(5):737-46
    1. J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):777-84
    1. Lancet. 1995 Dec 2;346(8988):1464-5
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 May;74(3):F177-81
    1. Eye (Lond). 1995;9 ( Pt 6 Su):26-30
    1. Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):779-83
    1. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):107-11
    1. J Perinatol. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):341-5
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Nov;77(3):F216-20
    1. J Pediatr. 1998 Jul;133(1):63-6
    1. Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):31-4
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Jul;79(1):F64-6
    1. Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3 Pt 1):514-8

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj