Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial

Yilong Wang, Weiqi Chen, Yi Lin, Xia Meng, Guohua Chen, Zhimin Wang, Jialing Wu, Dali Wang, Jianhua Li, Yibin Cao, Yuming Xu, Guohua Zhang, Xiaobo Li, Yuesong Pan, Hao Li, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Jinxi Lin, Kehui Dong, Jing Jing, S Claiborne Johnston, David Wang, Yongjun Wang, PRINCE Protocol Steering Group, Yilong Wang, Weiqi Chen, Yi Lin, Xia Meng, Guohua Chen, Zhimin Wang, Jialing Wu, Dali Wang, Jianhua Li, Yibin Cao, Yuming Xu, Guohua Zhang, Xiaobo Li, Yuesong Pan, Hao Li, Xingquan Zhao, Liping Liu, Jinxi Lin, Kehui Dong, Jing Jing, S Claiborne Johnston, David Wang, Yongjun Wang, PRINCE Protocol Steering Group

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypothesis that ticagrelor plus aspirin is safe and superior to clopidogrel plus aspirin for reducing high platelet reactivity at 90 days and stroke recurrence in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack, particularly in carriers of the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele and patients with large artery atherosclerosis.

Design: Open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial.

Setting: Prospective studies conducted at 26 centres in China, August 2015 to March 2017.

Participants: 675 patients with acute minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Intervention: Ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter) on a background of aspirin (100 mg daily for the first 21 days) within 24 hours of symptom onset.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with high platelet reactivity at 90 days. High platelet reactivity was defined as P2Y12 reaction units of more than 208. Secondary outcomes included high platelet reactivity at 90 days (7 days either way) in patients carrying genetic variants that would affect clopidogrel metabolism, and any stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) recurrence at 90 days (7 days either way), six months, and one year.

Results: At 90 days, high platelet reactivity occurred in 35 (12.5%) of 280 patients in the ticagrelor/aspirin group and 86 (29.7%) of 290 patients in the clopidogrel/aspirin group (risk ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.56; P<0.001), and in 10.8% versus 35.4% (0.31; 0.18 to 0.49; P<0.001) of patients carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. Stroke occurred in 21 (6.3%) of 336 patients in the ticagrelor/aspirin group and 30 (8.8%) of 339 patients in the clopidogrel/aspirin group (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 1.22; P=0.20). Patients with large artery atherosclerosis in the ticagrelor/aspirin group had a lower stroke recurrence at 90 days than those in the clopidogrel/aspirin group (6.0% v 13.1%; hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.98; P=0.04). No difference was seen in the rates of major or minor haemorrhagic events between the ticagrelor/aspirin and clopidogrel/aspirin groups (4.8% v 3.5%; P=0.42).

Conclusion: Patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack who are treated with ticagrelor plus aspirin have a lower proportion of high platelet reactivity than those who are treated with clopidogrel plus aspirin, particularly for those who are carriers of the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele. The results of this study should be evaluated further in large scale, phase III trials and in different populations.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02506140.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Beijing Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, and National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Trial profile. TIA=transient ischaemic attack; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; ICH/SAH=intracerebral haemorrhage/subarachnoid haemorrhage; Hct=haematocrit; CT=computed tomography; VerifyNow P2Y12=VerifyNow P2Y12 platelet reactivity assay
Fig 2
Fig 2
Platelet reactivity in trial groups at baseline and follow-up, showing P2Y12 reaction units (PRU; mean (standard deviation)) and proportion (%; 95% confidence intervals) of patients with high platelet reactivity (HOPR; PRU >208 as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). A total of 333, 306, and 280 patients in the ticagrelor/aspirin group and 336, 321, and 290 patients in the clopidogrel/aspirin group were included in the 0, 7, and 90 day analyses, respectively
Fig 3
Fig 3
Effect of ticagrelor/aspirin versus clopidogrel/aspirin on high platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in PRINCE trial participants at 90 days, stratified by metaboliser status. A total of 321 patients in the ticagrelor/aspirin group and 329 patients in the clopidogrel/aspirin group were included in the genetic analysis. Patients with two *2 or *3 alleles (*2/*2, *2/*3, or *3/*3) were classified as having a poor metaboliser phenotype, those with one *2 or *3 allele (*1/*2 or *1/*3) were classified as having an intermediate metaboliser phenotype, those without a *2, *3, or *17 allele (*1/*1) were classified as having an extensive metaboliser phenotype, and those with a single *17 allele (*1/*17) and *17 homozygotes were classified as having an ultra-metaboliser phenotype. HOPR=P2Y12 reaction units of more than 208, as measured the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay; composite event=a new clinical vascular event, including stroke, transient ischaemic attack, myocardial infarction, or death from cardiovascular causes; NA=not applicable
Fig 4
Fig 4
Stroke recurrence risk with ticagrelor/aspirin versus clopidogrel/aspirin in PRINCE trial participants at 90 days, based on cause of stroke. LAA=large-artery atherosclerosis; Non-LAA=non-large-artery atherosclerosis (including cardioaortic embolism, small artery occlusion, other causes, and undetermined causes)

References

    1. Amarenco P, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, et al. Investigators One-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1533-42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1412981.
    1. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. CHANCE Investigators Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2013;369:11-9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1215340.
    1. Wang D, Gui L, Dong Y, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of non-intracranial haemorrhage in patients with minor strokes: a subgroup analysis of the CHANCE trial. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2016;1:29-36. 10.1136/svn-2016-000008.
    1. Wang Y, Minematsu K, Wong KS, et al. SOCRATES Steering Committee and Investigators Ticagrelor in acute stroke or transient ischemic attack in Asian patients: from the SOCRATES Trial (acute stroke or transient ischemic attack treated with aspirin or ticagrelor and patient outcomes). Stroke 2017;48:167-73. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014891.
    1. Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, et al. CICAS Study Group Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke 2014;45:663-9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003508.
    1. Liu L, Wong KS, Leng X, et al. CHANCE Investigators Dual antiplatelet therapy in stroke and ICAS: Subgroup analysis of CHANCE. Neurology 2015;85:1154-62. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001972.
    1. Brilakis ES, Patel VG, Banerjee S. Medical management after coronary stent implantation: a review. JAMA 2013;310:189-98. 10.1001/jama.2013.7086.
    1. Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, et al. PLATO investigators Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: a genetic substudy of the PLATO trial. Lancet 2010;376:1320-8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61274-3.
    1. Amarenco P, Albers GW, Denison H, et al. SOCRATES Steering Committee and Investigators Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack of atherosclerotic origin: a subgroup analysis of SOCRATES, a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:301-10. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30038-8.
    1. Johnston SC, Amarenco P, Albers GW, et al. SOCRATES Steering Committee and Investigators Ticagrelor versus aspirin in acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2016;375:35-43. 10.1056/NEJMoa1603060.
    1. Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Guyer K, et al. Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1820-6. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.041.
    1. Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J, et al. High post-treatment platelet reactivity identified low-responders to dual antiplatelet therapy at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after stenting for acute coronary syndrome. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:542-9. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01751.x.
    1. Wenaweser P, Dörffler-Melly J, Imboden K, et al. Stent thrombosis is associated with an impaired response to antiplatelet therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1748-52. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.058.
    1. Breet NJ, van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ, et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. JAMA 2010;303:754-62. 10.1001/jama.2010.181.
    1. Zheng AS, Churilov L, Colley RE, Goh C, Davis SM, Yan B. Association of aspirin resistance with increased stroke severity and infarct size. JAMA Neurol 2013;70:208-13. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.601.
    1. Fiolaki A, Katsanos AH, Kyritsis AP, et al. High on treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017;376:112-6. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.010.
    1. Wang Y, Lin Y, Meng X, et al. PRINCE Protocol Steering Group Effect of ticagrelor with clopidogrel on high on-treatment platelet reactivity in acute stroke or transient ischemic attack (PRINCE) trial: Rationale and design. Int J Stroke 2017;12:321-5. 10.1177/1747493017694390.
    1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. PLATO Investigators Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1045-57. 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327.
    1. Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2013;94:317-23. 10.1038/clpt.2013.105.
    1. Wang Y, Zhao X, Lin J, et al. CHANCE investigators Association between CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele status and efficacy of clopidogrel for risk reduction among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. JAMA 2016;316:70-8. 10.1001/jama.2016.8662.
    1. Paré G, Mehta SR, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of CYP2C19 genotype on outcomes of clopidogrel treatment. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1704-14. 10.1056/NEJMoa1008410.
    1. Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Gardner EE, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450-2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype and clopidogrel therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;90:328-32. 10.1038/clpt.2011.132.
    1. Gupta A, Thompson D, Whitehouse A, et al. ASCOT Investigators Adverse events associated with unblinded, but not with blinded, statin therapy in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and its non-randomised non-blind extension phase. Lancet 2017;389:2473-81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31075-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj