Comparative Analysis of Phase Lag Entropy and Bispectral Index as Anesthetic Depth Indicators in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgery with Nerve Integrity Monitoring

Kwon Hui Seo, Kyung Mi Kim, Soo Kyung Lee, Hyunji John, Junsuck Lee, Kwon Hui Seo, Kyung Mi Kim, Soo Kyung Lee, Hyunji John, Junsuck Lee

Abstract

Background: Most depth of anesthesia (DOA) monitors rely on the temporal characteristics of a single-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) and cannot provide spatial or connectivity information. Phase lag entropy (PLE) reflects DOA by calculating diverse connectivity from temporal patterns of phase relationships. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of PLE and bispectral index (BIS) monitors for assessing DOA during anesthesia induction, nerve integrity monitoring (NIM), and anesthesia emergence.

Methods: Thirty-five patients undergoing elective thyroid surgery with recurrent laryngeal nerve NIM received propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. After applying PLE and BIS monitors, propofol infusion was initiated at a calculated effect site concentration (Ce) of 2 μg/mL and then increased in 1-μg/mL Ce increments. After propofol Ce reached 5 μ/mL, a remifentanil infusion was begun, and anesthesia induction was considered complete. During NIM, PLE and BIS values were compared at a specific time points from platysma muscle exposure to subcutaneous tissue closure. PLE and BIS values were recorded continuously from preanesthetic state to full recovery of orientation; bias and limits of agreement between monitors were calculated.

Results: PLE and BIS values decreased progressively with increasing propofol Ce during anesthetic induction and increased by stages during emergence. The prediction probabilities of PLE and BIS for detecting propofol Ce changes were 0.750 and 0.756, respectively, during induction and 0.749 and 0.746, respectively, during emergence. No aberrant PLE or BIS values occurred during NIM. Correlation coefficients for BIS and PLE were 0.98 and 0.92 during induction and emergence, respectively. PLE values were significantly higher than BIS values at full recovery of orientation. Estimated bias between monitors was -4.16 ± 8.7, and 95% limits of agreement were -21.21 to 12.89.

Conclusion: PLE is a reasonable alternative to BIS for evaluating consciousness and DOA during general anesthesia and during NIM.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0003490.

Keywords: Consciousness Monitors; Electroencephalography; Entropy; General Anesthesia; Propofol.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflict of interest to disclose. The present study was supported from InBody to use the PLEM100 device and PLEM-ES100 electrode. However, their support did not affect the results of the present study.

© 2019 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Figures

Fig. 1. Placement of BIS and PLE…
Fig. 1. Placement of BIS and PLE electrodes. BIS electrodes are located on the upper forehead (lower area of the photograph) and correspond to the 10–20 International System bipolar montages of Fz (Fpz or Afz: lead 1) to F7 (F9 or FT9: lead 3) and F3 (AF3: lead 2) to F7. Lead 4 is the ground electrode. PLE electrodes are located on the lower forehead (upper area of the photograph): Fp1 (L1), AF5 (L2), Fp2 (R1), AF6 (R2), and ground (C).
BIS = bispectral index, PLE = phase lag entropy.
Fig. 2. Box and whiskers plots of…
Fig. 2. Box and whiskers plots of PLE and BIS values during anesthesia induction and emergence. (A) Both PLE and BIS values decrease progressively with increasing propofol Ce during anesthetic induction. (B) Both PLE and BIS values increase by stages during emergence from anesthesia. The upper and lower limits of the box indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles of the sample, and the horizontal line inside each box indicates the median. The upper and lower notches indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles of the sample. Values below and above the notches are drawn as individual points.
PLE = phase lag entropy, BIS = bispectral index.
Fig. 3. Bland-Altman plot for (BIS+PLE)/2 vs.…
Fig. 3. Bland-Altman plot for (BIS+PLE)/2 vs. (BIS−PLE) containing 70,282 paired-index points recorded for 34 patients, reflecting the agreement between BIS and PLE values. The thin dotted line indicates the similarity of the 2 indices, the thick solid line indicates the estimated bias of the 2 indexes, and the thick dotted lines show the 95% limits of agreement.
BIS = bispectral index, PLE = phase lag entropy.

References

    1. Fahy BG, Chau DF. The technology of processed electroencephalogram monitoring devices for assessment of depth of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):111–117.
    1. Checketts MR, Alladi R, Ferguson K, Gemmell L, Handy JM, Klein AA, et al. Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2015: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):85–93.
    1. Johansen JW. Update on bispectral index monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20(1):81–99.
    1. Punjasawadwong Y, Phongchiewboon A, Bunchungmongkol N. Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(6):CD003843.
    1. Ku SW, Lee U, Noh GJ, Jun IG, Mashour GA. Preferential inhibition of frontal-to-parietal feedback connectivity is a neurophysiologic correlate of general anesthesia in surgical patients. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25155.
    1. Lee H, Noh GJ, Joo P, Choi BM, Silverstein BH, Kim M, et al. Diversity of functional connectivity patterns is reduced in propofol-induced unconsciousness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(10):4980–4995.
    1. Lioi G, Bell SL, Smith DC, Simpson DM. Measuring depth of anaesthesia using changes in directional connectivity: a comparison with auditory middle latency response and estimated bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(3):321–332.
    1. Dahaba AA. Different conditions that could result in the bispectral index indicating an incorrect hypnotic state. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):765–773.
    1. Kim DH, Yoo JY, Kim JY, Ahn SH, Kim S, Min SK. Influence of electrocautery-induced electromagnetic interference on quantitative electroencephalographic monitoring of hypnosis during general anesthesia: comparison between the ADMS® and the BIS VISTATM. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(5):368–373.
    1. Kim YS, Chung D, Oh SK, Won YJ, Lee IO. Unusual elevation in Entropy but not in PSI during general anesthesia: a case report. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):22.
    1. Chakrabarti D, Surve RM, Bs D, Masapu D. Intraoperative aberrant bispectral index values due to facial nerve monitoring. J Clin Anesth. 2017;37:61–62.
    1. Kim JH, Kim AN, Kim KW, Lee SI, Kim JY, Kim KT, et al. Interruption of bispectral index monitoring by nerve integrity monitoring during tympanoplasty: a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(2):161–163.
    1. Lee HC, Jung CW. Vital Recorder-a free research tool for automatic recording of high-resolution time-synchronised physiological data from multiple anaesthesia devices. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1527.
    1. Kanoga S, Mitsukura Y. Eye blink artifact rejection in single-channel electroencephalographic signals by complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:121–124.
    1. Miller A, Sleigh JW, Barnard J, Steyn-Ross DA. Does bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram add anything but complexity? Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(1):8–13.
    1. Pilge S, Kreuzer M, Karatchiviev V, Kochs EF, Malcharek M, Schneider G. Differences between state entropy and bispectral index during analysis of identical electroencephalogram signals: a comparison with two randomised anaesthetic techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(5):354–365.
    1. Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(1):38–51.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
    1. Voss L, Sleigh J. Monitoring consciousness: the current status of EEG-based depth of anaesthesia monitors. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2007;21(3):313–325.
    1. Nicolaou N, Hourris S, Alexandrou P, Georgiou J. EEG-based automatic classification of ‘awake’ versus ‘anesthetized’ state in general anesthesia using Granger causality. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33869.
    1. Barakat AR, Sutcliffe N, Schwab M. Effect site concentration during propofol TCI sedation: a comparison of sedation score with two pharmacokinetic models. Anaesthesia. 2007;62(7):661–666.
    1. Irwin MG, Hui TW, Milne SE, Kenny GN. Propofol effective concentration 50 and its relationship to bispectral index. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(3):242–248.
    1. Milne SE, Troy A, Irwin MG, Kenny GN. Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(2):127–131.
    1. Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, Berrino L, Chiefari M. Relationship between Bispectral Index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94(4):492–495.
    1. Kaskinoro K, Maksimow A, Långsjö J, Aantaa R, Jääskeläinen S, Kaisti K, et al. Wide inter-individual variability of bispectral index and spectral entropy at loss of consciousness during increasing concentrations of dexmedetomidine, propofol, and sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):573–580.
    1. Kang MH, In CB, Kim MH, Lim KJ, Park EY, Lee HM, et al. Inappropriate elevation of bispectral index values in robot assisted thyroidectomy with electromyographic endotracheal tube: a case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61(6):511–514.
    1. Sloan PA. Interference of bispectral index monitoring with intraoperative use of the electromyograph endotracheal tube. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54(12):1028–1029.
    1. Schuller PJ, Newell S, Strickland PA, Barry JJ. Response of bispectral index to neuromuscular block in awake volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(Suppl 1):i95–i103.
    1. Chen X, Tang J, White PF, Wender RH, Ma H, Sloninsky A, et al. A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1669–1674.
    1. Liu PP, Wu C, Wu JZ, Zhang MZ, Zheng JJ, Shen Y, et al. The prediction probabilities for emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia in children: a comparison of the perfusion index and the bispectral index. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(3):281–286.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj