Model-based analysis of flow-mediated dilation and intima-media thickness

G Bartoli, G Menegaz, M Lisi, G Di Stolfo, S Dragoni, T Gori, G Bartoli, G Menegaz, M Lisi, G Di Stolfo, S Dragoni, T Gori

Abstract

We present an end-to-end system for the automatic measurement of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and intima-media thickness (IMT) for the assessment of the arterial function. The video sequences are acquired from a B-mode echographic scanner. A spline model (deformable template) is fitted to the data to detect the artery boundaries and track them all along the video sequence. The a priori knowledge about the image features and its content is exploited. Preprocessing is performed to improve both the visual quality of video frames for visual inspection and the performance of the segmentation algorithm without affecting the accuracy of the measurements. The system allows real-time processing as well as a high level of interactivity with the user. This is obtained by a graphical user interface (GUI) enabling the cardiologist to supervise the whole process and to eventually reset the contour extraction at any point in time. The system was validated and the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the measurements were assessed with extensive in vivo experiments. Jointly with the user friendliness, low cost, and robustness, this makes the system suitable for both research and daily clinical use.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical FMD image resulting from the echo scanner.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preprocessing. (a) Original image; (b) after histogram stretching; (c) after sharpening.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Search region for positioning the spline curve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results: the modeling splines corresponding to the upper and lower boundaries are represented as red curves.
Figure 5
Figure 5
FMD analysis. (a) Correlation between manual (gold standard, horizontal axis) and automatic (vertical axis) analyses; (b) Bland and Altman plot: difference between software and manual measurements versus their average.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Correlation between repeated measurements in 25 healthy subjects studied twice with a delay of 24 hours. (a) Resting diameter; (b) FMD. The interclass correlation coefficients are ICC = 0.85 and ICC = 0.63, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Repeatability. (a) FMD; (b) IMT.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Bland and Altman plots of repeated measurements. The horizontal axis reports the average of two consecutive measurements, the vertical axis their difference. The dotted lines represent 1.96 standard deviation from the mean. (a) Diameter; (b) FMD.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Reference frame: ROI selection.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The first window of the software presents an “average frame” derived as an average of all frames in the video and is used to manually set the ROI. The second window requires the operator to click on two calibration marks to calibrate the images.
Figure 11
Figure 11
FMD data. Thin line: artery diameter as a function of frame index. Thick line: artery diameter after smoothing. Red line: frame selection.

References

    1. Alam TA, Seifalian AM, Baker D. A review of methods currently used for assessment of in vivo endothelial function. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2005;29(3):269–276.
    1. Celermajer DS. Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? Is it reversible? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997;30(2):325–333.
    1. Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2003;23(2):168–175.
    1. Verma S, Buchanan MR, Anderson TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation. 2003;108(17):2054–2059.
    1. Busse R, Pohl U, Lückhoff A. Mechanisms controlling the production of endothelial autacoids. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie. 1989;78(supplement 6):64–69.
    1. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. The Lancet. 1992;340(8828):1111–1115.
    1. Pyke KE, Tschakovsky ME. Peak vs. total reactive hyperemia: which determines the magnitude of flow-mediated dilation? Journal of Applied Physiology. 2007;102(4):1510–1519.
    1. Fan L, Santago P, Jiang H, Herrington DM. Ultrasound measurement of brachial flow-mediated vasodilator response. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2000;19(6):621–631.
    1. Woodman RJ, Playford DA, Watts GF, et al. Improved analysis of brachial artery ultrasound using a novel edge-detection software system. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2001;91(2):929–937.
    1. Craiem D, Chironi G, Gariepy J, Miranda-Lacet J, Levenson J, Simon A. New monitoring software for larger clinical application of brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilatation measurements. Journal of Hypertension. 2007;25(1):133–140.
    1. Gemignani V, Faita F, Ghiadoni L, Poggianti E, Demi M. A system for real-time measurement of the brachial artery diameter in B-mode ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2007;26(3):393–404.
    1. Preik M, Lauer T, Heiß C, Tabery S, Strauer BE, Kelm M. Automated ultrasonic measurement of human arteries for the determination of endothelial function. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2000;21(5):195–198.
    1. Sidhu JS, Newey VR, Nassiri DK, Kaski J-C. A rapid and reproducible on line automated technique to determine endothelial function. Heart. 2002;88(3):289–292.
    1. Stadler RW, Karl WC, Lees RS. The application of echo-tracking methods to endothelium-dependent vasoreactivity and arterial compliance measurements. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 1996;22(1):35–42.
    1. Uehata A, Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, et al. Noninvasive assessment of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. Vascular Medicine. 1997;2(2):87–92.
    1. Gori T, Sicuro S, Dragoni S, Donati G, Forconi S, Parker JD. Sildenafil prevents endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia and reperfusion via opening of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels. A human in vivo study. Circulation. 2005;111(6):742–746.
    1. Gori T, Di Stolfo G, Sicuro S, et al. Correlation analysis between different parameters of conduit artery and microvascular vasodilation. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation. 2006;35(4):509–515.
    1. Gori T, Di Stolfo G, Sicuro S, et al. Nitroglycerin protects the endothelium from ischemia and reperfusion injury: human mechanistic insight. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2007;64(2):145–150.
    1. Leeson P, Thorne S, Donald A, Mullen M, Clarkson P, Deanfield J. Non-invasive measurement of endothelial function: effect on brachial artery dilatation of graded endothelial dependent and independent stimuli. Heart. 1997;78(1):22–27.
    1. Kanters SDJM, Algra A, van Leeuwen MS, Banga J-D. Reproducibility of in vivo carotid intima-media thickness measurements: a review. Stroke. 1997;28(3):665–671.
    1. Unser M, Aldroubi A, Eden M. B-spline signal processing. I. Theory. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 1993;41(2):821–833.
    1. Unser M. Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 1999;16(6):22–38.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
    1. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, et al. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the international brachial artery reactivity task force. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002;39(2):257–265.
    1. Pálinkás A, Tóth E, Venneri L, Rigo F, Csanády M, Picano E. Temporal heterogeneity of endothelium-dependent and -independent dilatation of brachial artery in patients with coronary artery disease. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2002;18(5):337–342.
    1. Beux F, Carmassi S, Salvetti MV, et al. Automatic evaluation of arterial diameter variation from vascular echographic images. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2001;27(12):1621–1629.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj