The effect of 3-month finasteride challenge on biomarkers for predicting cancer outcome on biopsy: Results of a randomized trial

Javier Hernandez, Jonathan Gelfond, Martin Goros, Michael A Liss, Yuanyuan Liang, Donna Ankerst, Ian M Thompson Jr, Robin J Leach, Javier Hernandez, Jonathan Gelfond, Martin Goros, Michael A Liss, Yuanyuan Liang, Donna Ankerst, Ian M Thompson Jr, Robin J Leach

Abstract

Background: Finasteride, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor may have effects on biomarkers such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) that could be leveraged to improve screening.

Objective: To determine the predictive characteristics of biomarkers for prostate cancer for cancer on biopsy following 3 months of finasteride use compared with placebo.

Design, setting and participants: 383 men from multiple clinical sites with intermediate prostate cancer risk, without history of prostate cancer, were randomly allocated in a double-blinded manner, 4:1, to receive either finasteride or placebo for 90 days at which time a prostate biopsy was performed.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcomes were associations of biomarkers with prostate cancer that were tested using multiple logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curves (AUC). Biomarkers for PCA risk (PCA3, TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) gene product, and PSA) were measured at baseline and at biopsy in a blinded fashion to assess the predictive performance of baseline levels, 90-day levels, and measures of change relative to standard predictors.

Results and limitations: A total of 292 (233 finasteride; 59 placebo) randomized patients underwent biopsy and were analyzed. On finasteride, baseline and 90-day measures of PCA3 and T2:ERG had similar moderate discrimination capacity with AUCs 62 to 65% (p-values < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively), but their rates of change had no discrimination ability (AUC 51%, (95% CI 43 to 60% p = 0.72) and 48% (95% CI 44 to 60%, p = 0.62), respectively).) Relative to baseline, the 90-day PCA3 and PSA decreased in the finasteride group by 25% and 50%, respectively (both p<0.001). T2:ERG had a smaller, non-significant change post finasteride treatment (p = 0.08).

Conclusions: Short-term finasteride therapy did not improve performance of the most commonly-employed prostate cancer biomarkers. Threshold values for new biomarkers of prostate cancer should be interpreted with caution in patients receiving finasteride until formal validation of test performance in these patients is conducted.

Patient summary: Three months of finasteride treatment did not increase the accuracy for predicting the outcome on prostate biopsy but did have a significant effect on biomarker values. Adjustments to thresholds for biopsy for men on finasteride are proposed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01296672.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT patient flow diagram for…
Fig 1. CONSORT patient flow diagram for the finasteride challenge trial.
Patients were excluded based on their risk of high grade disease based updated clinical data. PSA measurements were often repeated to be within the 6 month window at time of enrollment. The loss to follow-up subjects included men who withdrew from the study, many of whom decided to postpone their prostate biopsies.
Fig 2. PCA3, T2:ERG and PSA ratios…
Fig 2. PCA3, T2:ERG and PSA ratios on finasteride for determination of inflation factors; PCA = prostate cancer.
Boxplots depict the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles. Outliers are not shown due to extreme variability of T2:ERG ratios.

References

    1. Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level≤ 4.0 ng per milliliter. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(22):2239–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa031918
    1. Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. The New England journal of medicine. 2009;360(13):1320–8. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084 .
    1. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schrder FH. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology. 2002;60(5):826–30. .
    1. Rosario DJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Doble A, Goodwin L, et al. Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study. Bmj. 2012;344:d7894 10.1136/bmj.d7894 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3253765.
    1. Heijnsdijk EA, de Carvalho TM, Auvinen A, Zappa M, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: a simulation study based on ERSPC data. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015;107(1):366 10.1093/jnci/dju366 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4296196.
    1. Moyer VA, Force USPST. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of internal medicine. 2012;157(2):120–34. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459 .
    1. Ankerst DP, Groskopf J, Day JR, Blase A, Rittenhouse H, Pollock BH, et al. Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3. The Journal of urology. 2008;180(4):1303–8; discussion 8. 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.038 .
    1. Demichelis F, Fall K, Perner S, Andren O, Schmidt F, Setlur SR, et al. TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion associated with lethal prostate cancer in a watchful waiting cohort. Oncogene. 2007;26(31):4596–9. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210237 .
    1. Thompson IM, Chi C, Ankerst DP, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lippman SM, et al. Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2006;98(16):1128–33. 10.1093/jnci/djj307 .
    1. Andriole GL, Marberger M, Roehrborn CG. Clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen for the detection of prostate cancer is preserved in men receiving the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride. The Journal of urology. 2006;175(5):1657–62. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00984-5 .
    1. Guess HA, Heyse JF, Gormley GJ. The effect of finasteride on prostate-specific antigen in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Prostate. 1993;22(1):31–7. .
    1. Handel LN, Agarwal S, Schiff SF, Kelty PJ, Cohen SI. Can effect of finasteride on prostate-specific antigen be used to decrease repeat prostate biopsy? Urology. 2006;68(6):1220–3. 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1070 .
    1. Kaplan SA, Ghafar MA, Volpe MA, Lam JS, Fromer D, Te AE. PSA response to finasteride challenge in men with a serum PSA greater than 4 ng/ml and previous negative prostate biopsy: preliminary study. Urology. 2002;60(3):464–8. .
    1. Tarle M, Kraus O, Trnski D, Reljic A, Ruzic B, Katusic J, et al. Early diagnosis of prostate cancer in finasteride treated BPH patients. Anticancer research. 2003;23(1B):693–6. .
    1. Haese A, de la Taille A, van Poppel H, Marberger M, Stenzl A, Mulders PF, et al. Clinical utility of the PCA3 urine assay in European men scheduled for repeat biopsy. European urology. 2008;54(5):1081–8. 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.071 .
    1. Auprich M, Bjartell A, Chun FK, de la Taille A, Freedland SJ, Haese A, et al. Contemporary role of prostate cancer antigen 3 in the management of prostate cancer. European urology. 2011;60(5):1045–54. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.003 .
    1. Roobol MJ, Schroder FH, van Leeuwen P, Wolters T, van den Bergh RC, van Leenders GJ, et al. Performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene and prostate-specific antigen in prescreened men: exploring the value of PCA3 for a first-line diagnostic test. European urology. 2010;58(4):475–81. 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.039 .
    1. Marks LS, Fradet Y, Deras IL, Blase A, Mathis J, Aubin SM, et al. PCA3 molecular urine assay for prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat biopsy. Urology. 2007;69(3):532–5. 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.014 .
    1. Deras IL, Aubin SM, Blase A, Day JR, Koo S, Partin AW, et al. PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. The Journal of urology. 2008;179(4):1587–92. 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.038 .
    1. Ross AE, Feng Z, Pierorazio PM, Landis P, Walsh PC, Carter HB, et al. Effect of treatment with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on progression in monitored men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU international. 2012;110(5):651–7. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10875.x .
    1. Fleshner NE, Lucia MS, Egerdie B, Aaron L, Eure G, Nandy I, et al. Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9821):1103–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61619-X .

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj