Integration of musculoskeletal physical therapy care in the patient-centred medical home (IMPaC): protocol for a single-site randomised clinical trial

Erik Carvalho, Janet P Bettger, Lynn Bowlby, Marissa Carvalho, Daniel Dore, Misty W Corcoran, Ashley A Harris, Jennifer Bond, Adam P Goode, Erik Carvalho, Janet P Bettger, Lynn Bowlby, Marissa Carvalho, Daniel Dore, Misty W Corcoran, Ashley A Harris, Jennifer Bond, Adam P Goode

Abstract

Introduction: Annually, >50% of the US population reports musculoskeletal (MSK) pain to a provider, with direct healthcare costs exceeding $185 billion. The number of MSK complaints and the associated costs are projected to rise, increasing demand for and burden on providers. Establishing new care models to decrease inefficiencies may lower costs and optimise care delivery. The purpose of the Integration of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy Care in the Patient-Centred Medical Home (IMPaC) study is to compare initial evaluation by a physical therapist (PT) integrated into primary care versus initial evaluation by a primary care provider (PCP) for patients with an MSK complaint.

Methods and analysis: This single-site, randomised clinical trial will test the hypothesis that a PT within a primary care facility as the initial evaluating provider for patients with an MSK complaint will lower costs, improve utilisation (ie, reduced opioid prescriptions, imaging, physical therapy, emergency department visits and missed appointments) and increase patient satisfaction within 90 days of the index visit compared with PCP evaluation in the same location. Participants aged ≥18 years will be randomised with equal allocation and stratified by pain site (ie, back, knee, upper extremity and other). In the initial PT evaluation arm, patients will be assessed, treated and then instructed to complete a home exercise programme. The PCP cohort will undergo a usual PCP evaluation, and if a referral to physical therapy is made, patients will be randomised to onsite versus offsite physical therapy. Differences will be calculated and tested across the two arms.

Ethics and dissemination: Approval was received from the Duke University Institutional Review Board (01 May 2017) and the National Institutes of Health, National Centre for Advancing Translational Sciences (01 January 2017). Findings will be communicated via quarterly reports to funding bodies and disseminated through scientific publications.

Trial registration number: NCT03110211; Pre-results.

Keywords: co-location; integration; musculoskeletal; physical therapy; primary care.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Storheim K, Zwart JA. Musculoskeletal disorders and the Global Burden of Disease study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:949–50. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205327
    1. Friedman BW, Chilstrom M, Bijur PE, et al. . Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective. Spine 2010;35:E1406–11. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d952a5
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC/NCHS, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. 2009-2010. (accessed 20 Apr 2017).
    1. Fritz JM, Magel JS, McFadden M, et al. . Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;314:1459–67. 10.1001/jama.2015.11648
    1. Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, et al. . Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:150 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3
    1. Fritz JM, Childs JD, Wainner RS, et al. . Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: impact on future health care utilization and costs. Spine 2012;37:2114–21. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825d32f5
    1. Goode AP, Freburger JK, Carey TS. The influence of rural versus urban residence on utilization and receipt of care for chronic low back pain. J Rural Health 2013;29:205–14. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00436.x
    1. Carey TS, Freburger JK. Exercise and the Prevention of Low Back Pain: Ready for Implementation. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:208–9. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7636
    1. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Agans RP, et al. . The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:251–8. 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543
    1. Carey TS, Freburger JK, Holmes GM, et al. . A long way to go: practice patterns and evidence in chronic low back pain care. Spine 2009;34:718–24. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819792b0
    1. Katon W. Health reform, research pave way for collaborative care for mental illness. Interview by Bridge M. Kuehn. JAMA 2013;309:2425–6. 10.1001/jama.2013.6494
    1. Woltmann E, Grogan-Kaylor A, Perron B, et al. . Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2012;169:790–804. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616
    1. Goode AP, Bettger, JP C, et al. . The Influence of a Co-Located Physical Therapist in the Primary Care Medical Home on Opioid Prescriptions and Emergency Department Visits. Abstract]. Academy Health Annual Meeting. New Orleans, Louisianna 2017.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Underwood M. Diagnosing acute nonspecific low back pain: time to lower the red flags? Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:2855–7. 10.1002/art.24858
    1. Ferguson F, Holdsworth L, Rafferty D. Low back pain and physiotherapy use of red flags: the evidence from Scotland. Physiotherapy 2010;96:282–8. 10.1016/j.physio.2010.01.001
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401.
    1. Hill JC, Kang S, Benedetto E, et al. . Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012331 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012331
    1. Thayaparan AJ, Mahdi E. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18) as an adaptable, reliable, and validated tool for use in various settings. Med Educ Online 2013;18:21747 10.3402/meo.v18i0.21747

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj