Effect of universal HIV testing and treatment on socioeconomic wellbeing in rural Kenya and Uganda: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
Aleksandra Jakubowski, Jane Kabami, Laura B Balzer, James Ayieko, Edwin D Charlebois, Asiphas Owaraganise, Carina Marquez, Tamara D Clark, Douglas Black, Starley B Shade, Gabriel Chamie, Craig R Cohen, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Moses R Kamya, Maya Petersen, Diane V Havlir, Harsha Thirumurthy, Aleksandra Jakubowski, Jane Kabami, Laura B Balzer, James Ayieko, Edwin D Charlebois, Asiphas Owaraganise, Carina Marquez, Tamara D Clark, Douglas Black, Starley B Shade, Gabriel Chamie, Craig R Cohen, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Moses R Kamya, Maya Petersen, Diane V Havlir, Harsha Thirumurthy
Abstract
Background: Universal testing and treatment for HIV has shown promise as an approach to reduce mortality and lower HIV incidence. Evidence on the economic effects of this approach on individuals and households in low-resource settings is scarce. We aimed to examine the effect of universal HIV testing and treatment on a range of economic outcomes.
Methods: We collected data in household surveys done over a 3-year period in a sample of HIV-positive and HIV-negative adults participating in a cluster-randomised trial of universal HIV testing and treatment in 32 rural communities in Kenya and Uganda. Communities of approximately 10 000 people were pair-matched on the basis of geographical and population characteristics, with the best-matching 16 pairs randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention or control groups. Participants in intervention communities received annual HIV and multidisease testing, universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) eligibility, and patient-centred care. Participants in control communities received baseline testing and medical care according to national guidelines. We analysed employment and health-care utilisation outcomes for working-age adults (age 18-65 years) and education outcomes for school-age children (6-17 years) using data from 3 years after the intervention. This trial is now complete, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01864603.
Findings: Between July 9, 2013, and June 15, 2017, we collected survey data on 8198 working-age adults and 6755 school-age children. Compared with adults living with HIV in control communities, adults living with HIV in intervention communities were more likely to be employed (difference 9·7% [95% CI 2·1 to 18·3]), less likely to seek health care (-10·3% [-22·0 to 0·1]), and less likely to spend money on health care (-12·7% [-22·4 to 0·6]) 3 years after the intervention. We found no significant differences in outcomes between HIV-negative adults in intervention and control communities. Among children in households with HIV-positive adults, the intervention led to a 7·3% (95% CI 1·0 to 15·1) increase in primary school completion after 3 years in intervention communities compared with control communities.
Interpretation: Universal HIV testing and treatment improved employment outcomes and other indicators of socioeconomic wellbeing for HIV-positive adults and children in their households, but had no effect on HIV-negative adults. Our findings suggest that the considerable investments needed to expand ART access might have substantial short-term and long-term economic returns.
Funding: National Institutes of Health.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests EDC reports grants from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership. CRC reports grants by the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, serves as Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board at Osel, and reports receiving fees for legal consultation from and has stock options at Osel and Evvy. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed