Two-year interim safety results of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema: the observational PALADIN study

Sam E Mansour, Daniel F Kiernan, Daniel B Roth, David Eichenbaum, Nancy M Holekamp, Samer Kaba, Erica Werts, Sam E Mansour, Daniel F Kiernan, Daniel B Roth, David Eichenbaum, Nancy M Holekamp, Samer Kaba, Erica Werts

Abstract

Background: The 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant delivers continuous, low-dose, intravitreal corticosteroid for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This ongoing, 3-year, observational clinical trial provides long-term, 'real-world' safety results for the FAc implant in DMO.

Methods: This 24-month interim analysis of a prospective, observational study investigated patients with DMO receiving the commercially available intravitreal 0.2 µg/day FAc implant. The primary outcome was incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures. Other IOP-related signals and their relationship to previous corticosteroid exposure, best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness (CST), ocular adverse events and frequency of other treatments were also measured.

Results: Data were collected from 95 previously steroid-challenged patients (115 study eyes) for up to 36 months pre-FAc and 24 months post-FAc implant. Mean IOP for the overall population remained stable post-FAc compared with pre-FAc implant. IOP-related procedures remained infrequent (two IOP-lowering surgeries pre-FAc; two trabeculoplasties and four IOP-lowering surgeries post-FAc). Mean visual acuity was stable post-FAc (mean improvement of 1-3 letters) and fewer DMO treatments were required per year following FAc implant. Mean CST was significantly reduced at 24 months post-FAc implant (p<0.001) and the percentage of patients with CST ≤300 µm was significantly increased (p=0.041).

Conclusion: Few IOP-related procedures were reported during the 24 months post-FAc implant. Positive efficacy outcomes were noted after treatment, with stabilisation of vision and reduction in inflammation, demonstrated by CST. The FAc implant has a favourable benefit-risk profile in the management of DMO, especially when administered after a prior steroid challenge.

Trial registration number: NCT02424019.

Keywords: inflammation; intraocular pressure; macula; retina; treatment other.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: SEM has received clinical trial research funds from Alimera Sciences, Chengdu Kanghong Biotechnology, Clearside Biomedical and Genentech. DFK has received research support from Adverum, Alimera Sciences, Allergan, EyePoint and Graybug Pharmaceuticals, received consultant fees from Adverum, Alimera Sciences, Allergan, BVI, EyePoint, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, Notal Vision, Novartis, Physician Recommended Neutriceuticals and Regeneron, and participated in speakers bureau for Alimera Sciences, Allergan, EyePoint, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, Notal Vision, Physician Recommended Neutriceuticals, Regeneron and Spark Therapeutics. DBR has received personal fees from Alimera Sciences, Allergan and Genentech. DE has received personal fees from Alimera Sciences, Allergan, Clearside, EyePoint, Genentech, Gyroscope, Kodiak, Network Eye, Notal Vision, Novartis and Regeneron, received research support from Alimera Sciences, Allergan, Chengdu, Clearside, DORC, Genentech, Gyroscope, Kodiak NGM, Mylan, Network Eye, Novartis, Ophthotech, Ophthea and Recens Medical and received equity from Boston Image Reading Center, Hemera Biopharmaceuticals and US Retina. NMH has received research support from Gemini, Gyroscope, Roche and Genentech, received consultant fees from Acucela, Alimera Sciences, Allegro, Allergan, Clearside, Genentech, Katalyst, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Notal Vision, Novartis, Regeneron, and Spark, and has patents and stock ownership with Katalyst. SK and EW are employees of Alimera Sciences.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) (SD) over time pre-fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) and post-FAc and (B) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) post-FAc in patients with baseline BCVA ≥20/40 and BCVA

Figure 2

Treatment frequency shift data assessed…

Figure 2

Treatment frequency shift data assessed by (A) yearly treatment frequency shift and (B)…

Figure 2
Treatment frequency shift data assessed by (A) yearly treatment frequency shift and (B) time to rescue treatments. FAc, fluocinolone acetonide.

Figure 3

Central subfield thickness (CST) outcomes…

Figure 3

Central subfield thickness (CST) outcomes in 113 eyes measured by (A) mean CST…

Figure 3
Central subfield thickness (CST) outcomes in 113 eyes measured by (A) mean CST pre-fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) and post-FAc implant, (B) the percentage of eyes with CST ≤300 µm (SE) at baseline and 24 months post-FAc implant and (C) mean retinal thickness amplitude (RTA) of CST (SE) pre-FAc and post-FAc implant. *p†p=0.013, ‡p=0.041.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Treatment frequency shift data assessed by (A) yearly treatment frequency shift and (B) time to rescue treatments. FAc, fluocinolone acetonide.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Central subfield thickness (CST) outcomes in 113 eyes measured by (A) mean CST pre-fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) and post-FAc implant, (B) the percentage of eyes with CST ≤300 µm (SE) at baseline and 24 months post-FAc implant and (C) mean retinal thickness amplitude (RTA) of CST (SE) pre-FAc and post-FAc implant. *p†p=0.013, ‡p=0.041.

References

    1. Yau JWY, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. . Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2012;35:556–64. 10.2337/dc11-1909
    1. Rübsam A, Parikh S, Fort PE. Role of inflammation in diabetic retinopathy. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:E942. 10.3390/ijms19040942
    1. Solomon SD, Chew E, Duh EJ, et al. . Diabetic retinopathy: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2017;40:412–8. 10.2337/dc16-2641
    1. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Elman MJ, Aiello LP, et al. . Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1064–77. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031
    1. Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Gonzalez VH, et al. . The DA VINCI study: phase 2 primary results of VEGF trap-eye in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1819–26. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.018
    1. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. . Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2012;119:789–801. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039
    1. Bressler NM, Beaulieu WT, Glassman AR, et al. . Persistent macular thickening following intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for central-involved diabetic macular edema with vision impairment: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:257–69. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6565
    1. Ciulla TA, Bracha P, Pollack J, et al. . Real-world outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema in the United States. Ophthalmol Retina 2018;2:1179–87. 10.1016/j.oret.2018.06.004
    1. Shih V, Lum F, Holekamp N, et al. . Outcomes of AVF treatment switch in DME patients in US clinical practice: analysis of the AAO IRIS database. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019;60:3865.
    1. Ehlken C, Helms M, Böhringer D, et al. . Association of treatment adherence with real-life VA outcomes in AMD, DME, and BRVO patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:13–20. 10.2147/OPTH.S151611
    1. Bailey C, Chakravarthy U, Lotery A, et al. . Clinical trial outcomes with ILUVIEN (fluocinolone acetonide) in the treatment of chronic diabetic macular oedema (DMO) are predictive of real-world outcomes after 24 months of continuous therapy. Poster presented at the 8th World Congress on Controversies in Ophthalmology (COPHy) Annual Meeting; 30 Mar, 2017.
    1. Das A, McGuire PG, Rangasamy S. Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1375–94. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.024
    1. Rangasamy S, McGuire PG, Das A. Diabetic retinopathy and inflammation: novel therapeutic targets. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:52–9. 10.4103/0974-9233.92116
    1. Campochiaro PA, Nguyen QD, Hafiz G, et al. . Aqueous levels of fluocinolone acetonide after administration of fluocinolone acetonide inserts or fluocinolone acetonide implants. Ophthalmology 2013;120:583–7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.014
    1. Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Pearson A, et al. . Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts provide benefit for at least 3 years in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2125–32. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.030
    1. Parrish RK, Campochiaro PA, Pearson PA, et al. . Characterization of intraocular pressure increases and management strategies following treatment with fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implants in the FAME trials. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2016;47:426–35. 10.3928/23258160-20160419-05
    1. US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) . Center for drug evaluation and research. summary review for ILUVIEN (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert), 2014. Available: [Accessed 19 Dec 2019].
    1. Eaton A, Koh SS, Jimenez J, et al. . The USER study: a chart review of patients receiving a 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol Ther 2019;8:51–62. 10.1007/s40123-018-0155-5
    1. Kiss S, Chandwani HS, Cole AL, et al. . Comorbidity and health care visit burden in working-age commercially insured patients with diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:2443–53. 10.2147/OPTH.S114006
    1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) . Iluvien (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant): highlights of prescribing information (PI), 2017. Available: [Accessed 11 Jul 2019].
    1. Havens SJ, Gulati V. Neovascular glaucoma. Dev Ophthalmol 2016;55:196–204. 10.1159/000431196
    1. Boyer DS, Yoon YH, Belfort R, et al. . Three-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1904–14. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.024
    1. Sivaprasad S, Oyetunde S. Impact of injection therapy on retinal patients with diabetic macular edema or retinal vein occlusion. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:939–46. 10.2147/OPTH.S100168
    1. Shimizu N, Oshitari T, Tatsumi T, et al. . Comparisons of efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1747108. 10.1155/2017/1747108
    1. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, et al. . Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology 2015;122:2044–52. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.017
    1. US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) . LUCENTIS (ranibizumab injection) intravitreal injection: highlights of prescribing information (PI), 2006. Available: [Accessed 14 Aug 2019].
    1. US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) . EYLEA (aflibercept injection) intravitreal injection: highlights of prescribing information (PI), 2011. Available: [Accessed 14 Aug 2019].
    1. Bucolo C, Gozzo L, Longo L, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety profile of multiple injections of intravitreal dexamethasone implant to manage diabetic macular edema: a systematic review of real-world studies. J Pharmacol Sci 2018;138:219–32. 10.1016/j.jphs.2018.11.001
    1. Kane FE, Green KE. Ocular pharmacokinetics of fluocinolone acetonide following Iluvien implantation in the vitreous humor of rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2015;31:11–16. 10.1089/jop.2014.0100
    1. Whitcup SM, Cidlowski JA, Csaky KG, et al. . Pharmacology of corticosteroids for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:1–12. 10.1167/iovs.17-22259
    1. Sadda SR, Campbell J, Dugel PU, et al. . Relationship between duration and extent of oedema and visual acuity outcome with ranibizumab in diabetic macular oedema: a post hoc analysis of protocol I data. Eye 2020;34:480–90. 10.1038/s41433-019-0522-z
    1. Schechet SA, Adams OE, Eichenbaum DA, et al. . Macular thickness amplitude changes when switching from discontinuous to continuous therapy for diabetic macular oedema. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2019;4:e000271. 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000271

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj