Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral panobinostat in patients with hematologic and solid tumors

Marina Savelieva, Margaret M Woo, Horst Schran, Song Mu, Jerry Nedelman, Renaud Capdeville, Marina Savelieva, Margaret M Woo, Horst Schran, Song Mu, Jerry Nedelman, Renaud Capdeville

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of panobinostat, a pan-deacetylase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma.

Methods: A nonlinear mixed-effect model was used to fit plasma panobinostat concentration-time data collected from patients across 14 phase 1 and phase 2 trials following either oral or intravenous (IV) administration. The model was used to estimate bioavailabilities of the two oral formulations and the effects of demographic and clinical covariates on the central volume of distribution and clearance of panobinostat.

Results: A total of 7834 samples from 581 patients were analyzed. Panobinostat pharmacokinetic parameters were best characterized by a three-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Bioavailability was 21.4 %. Median clearance was 33.1 L/h. Interindividual variability in clearance was 74 %. For Caucasian patients of median age 61 years, area under the curve (AUC) decreased from 104 to 88 ng · h/mL as body surface area (BSA) increased from the first to third quartiles, 1.8 to 2.1 m(2). For Caucasian patients of median BSA 1.9 m(2), AUC decreased from 102 to 95 ng · h/mL as age increased from the first to third quartiles, 51 to 70 years. For patients of median BSA and median age, AUC ranged across the four race categories from 80 to 116 ng · h/mL. Covariate analysis showed no impact on panobinostat clearance and volume by patients' sex, tumor type, kidney function, liver markers, or coadministered medications. However, separate analyses of dedicated studies have demonstrated effects of liver impairment and CYP3A4 inhibition.

Conclusions: Although covariate analyses revealed significant effects of body size, age, and race on panobinostat pharmacokinetics, these effects were minor compared to the interindividual variability and therefore not clinically relevant when dosing panobinostat in populations similar to those studied.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Histograms and summary statistics of baseline covariates for the 581 patients in the analysis data set
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Arithmetic mean (SD) plasma panobinostat concentration-time plots following day 1 for intravenous panobinostat at doses of 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 7.2, and 9 mg/m2 (a) and oral panobinostat at doses of 20, 30, and 40 mg for all schedules (b). Semilogarithmic view (data on file)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Simulated concentration time curves for the two final models, for a 61-year-old Caucasian patient with BSA 1.9 m2 (first final model) or weight 76.4 kg (second final model) receiving 20 mg of the FMI on days 1, 3, and 5
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ab Visual predictive checks. Data for non-Japanese patients are indicated by gray plus signs. Data for Japanese patients are indicated by black squares. The dashed lines connect the medians and the 10th and 90th percentiles of the raw data in the defined bins. The solid lines connect the medians and the 10th and 90th percentiles of the simulations. Dosing was 20 mg on days 1, 3, 5, and 8

References

    1. Atadja P. Development of the pan-DAC inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589): successes and challenges. Cancer Lett. 2009;280:233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.02.019.
    1. Prince HM, Bishton MJ, Johnstone RW. Panobinostat (LBH589): a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising activity against hematologic and solid tumors. Future Oncol. 2009;5:601–612. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.36.
    1. DeAngelo DJ, Spencer A, Bhalla KN, Prince HM, Fischer T, Kindler T, Giles FJ, Scott JW, Parker K, Liu A, Woo M, Atadja P, Mishra KK, Ottmann OG. Phase Ia/II, two-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study of oral panobinostat administered via two dosing schedules in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Leukemia. 2013;27:1628–1636. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.38.
    1. Duvic M, Dummer R, Becker JC, Poulalhon N, Ortiz Romero P, Grazia Bernengo M, Lebbe C, Assaf C, Squier M, Williams D, Marshood M, Tai F, Prince HM. Panobinostat activity in both bexarotene-exposed and -naive patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: results of a phase II trial. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.017.
    1. Feld R, Woo MM, Leighl N, Shepherd FA, Beck JT, Zhao L, Gazi L, Hengelage T, Porro MG, Nayak A. A clinical investigation of inhibitory effect of panobinostat on CYP2D6 substrate in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;72:747–755. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2237-3.
    1. Giles F, Fischer T, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, Beck J, Ravandi F, Masson E, Rae P, Laird G, Sharma S, Kantarjian H, Dugan M, Albitar M, Bhalla K. A phase I study of intravenous LBH589, a novel cinnamic hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4628–4635. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0511.
    1. Guilhot F, Dubruille V, Skotnicki AB, Hellmann A, Shamsazar J, Bourquelot PM, Jalaluddin M, Li M, Abruzzese E, Akard L. A phase II study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) in accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients resistant to >=2 BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2008;112:4263.
    1. Wolf JL, Siegel D, Goldschmidt H, Hazell K, Bourquelot PM, Bengoudifa BR, Matous J, Vij R, de Magalhaes-Silverman M, Abonour R, Anderson KC, Lonial S. A phase II trial of the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat as a single agent in advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:1820–1823. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.661175.
    1. Zaritskey A, Alimena G, Konopka L, Shamsazar J, Bourquelot PM, Jalaluddin M, Li M, Turkina A, Ossenkoppele GJ, Goldberg SL, Powell B. A phase II study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance to >=2 BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2008;112:4254.
    1. Sharma S, Beck J, Mita M, Paul S, Woo MM, Squier M, Gadbaw B, Prince HM. A phase I dose-escalation study of intravenous panobinostat in patients with lymphoma and solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2013;31:974–985. doi: 10.1007/s10637-013-9930-2.
    1. Study of Oral LBH589 in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma and adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. http://www.clinicaltrials gov/ct2/show/NCT00699296
    1. Fukutomi A, Hatake K, Matsui K, Sakajiri S, Hirashima T, Tanii H, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto N. A phase I study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30:1096–1106. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9666-9.
    1. Prince HM, George D, Patnaik A, Mita M, Dugan M, Butterfoss D, Masson E, Culver KW, Burris HA,III, Beck J (2007) Phase I study of oral LBH589, a novel deacetylase (DAC) inhibitor in advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25:[abstract 3500]
    1. Hamberg P, Woo MM, Chen LC, Verweij J, Porro MG, Zhao L, Li W, van der Biessen D, Sharma S, Hengelage T, de Jonge M. Effect of ketoconazole-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition on clinical pharmacokinetics of panobinostat (LBH589), an orally active histone deacetylase inhibitor. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;68:805–813. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1693-x.
    1. Shapiro GI, Frank R, Dandamudi UB, Hengelage T, Zhao L, Gazi L, Porro MG, Woo MM, Lewis LD. The effect of food on the bioavailability of panobinostat, an orally active pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:555–562. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1758-x.
    1. Younes A, Sureda A, Ben-Yehuda D, Zinzani PL, Ong TC, Prince HM, Harrison SJ, Kirschbaum M, Johnston P, Gallagher J, Le Corre C, Shen A, Engert A. Panobinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma after autologous stem-cell transplantation: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2197–2203. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.1350.
    1. Woo MM, Culver K, Li W, Liu A, Scott J, Parker K, Jalaluddin M, Laird G, Cooper MR, Schran HF (2008) Panobinostat (LBH589) pharmacokinetics (PK): implications for clinical safety and efficacy. Annal Oncol 19:viii161 [abstract 487P, poster presented at ESMO 2008]
    1. Clive S, Woo MM, Nydam T, Kelly L, Squier M, Kagan M. Characterizing the disposition, metabolism, and excretion of an orally active pan-deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat, via trace radiolabeled 14C material in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;70:513–522. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1940-9.
    1. Sharma S, Witteveen PO, Lolkema MP, Hess D, Gelderblom H, Hussain SA, Porro MG, Waldron E, Valera SZ, Mu S (2015) A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of renal function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75:87–95
    1. Wahlby U, Jonsson EN, Karlsson MO (2002) Comparison of stepwise covariate model building strategies in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. AAPS PharmSci 4:E27
    1. Comets E, Brendel K, Mentre F (2010) Model evaluation in nonlinear mixed effect models, with applications to pharmacokinetics. J Soc Fr Statistique 151:106–128
    1. Holford N, Heo YA, Anderson B. A pharmacokinetic standard for babies and adults. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:2941–2952. doi: 10.1002/jps.23574.
    1. Slingerland M, Hess D, Clive S, Sharma S, Sandstrom P, Loman N, Porro MG, Mu S, Waldron E, Valera SZ, Gelderblom H. A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and various degrees of hepatic function. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014;74:1089–1098. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2594-6.
    1. Savelieva M, Woo MM, Lin R, Nedelman J, Mu S, Capdeville R (Submitted: Jan 2015) A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of platelet count in patients treated with panobinostat. Eur J Clin Pharmacol

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj