The Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Charlotte Mühlmann, Trine Madsen, Carsten Hjorthøj, Ad Kerkhof, Merete Nordentoft, Annette Erlangsen, Charlotte Mühlmann, Trine Madsen, Carsten Hjorthøj, Ad Kerkhof, Merete Nordentoft, Annette Erlangsen

Abstract

Background: Suicidal thoughts are common, causing distress for millions of people all over the world. However, people with suicidal thoughts might not access support due to financial restraints, stigma or a lack of available treatment offers. Self-help programs provided online could overcome these barriers, and previous efforts show promising results in terms of reducing suicidal thoughts. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of an online self-help intervention in reducing suicidal thoughts among people at risk of suicide. The Danish Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial is a partial replication of a previously conducted Dutch trial.

Methods and design: A randomized, waiting-list controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio will be carried out. A total of 438 people with suicidal thoughts will be recruited from the Danish suicide hotline, The Lifeline's, website and allocated to the intervention condition (N = 219) or the control condition (N = 219). The intervention condition consists of a 6-week, Internet-based self-help therapy intervention. The format of the intervention is self-help, but the participants can be guided by the trial manager. The control condition consists of a waiting-list assignment for 32 weeks. The primary outcomes are frequency and intensity of suicidal thoughts. Secondary outcome measures include depressive symptoms, hopelessness, worrying, quality of life, costs related to health care utilization and production loss. Number of deliberate self-harm episodes, suicides and deaths will, as well as the participant's evaluation of the intervention and the experience of negative effects, be investigated. Assessments will be conducted over the intervention website through self-report questionnaires at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 32 weeks (6 months post intervention).

Discussion: If we find the intervention to be linked to reductions in suicidal thoughts, this will strengthen the evidence that online self-help interventions are relevant tools for people with suicidal thoughts.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872610 . Registered on 9 August 2016.

Keywords: Cognitive behavioral therapy; Internet intervention; Online intervention; Randomized controlled trial; Self-help; Suicidal ideation; Suicidal thoughts.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram for the Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) figure

References

    1. WHO. . World Health Organization 2016. [cited 2017 Jan 24].
    1. Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A, et al. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(2):98–105. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040113.
    1. Erlangsen A, Lind BD, Stuart EA, Qin P, Stenager E, Larsen KJ, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of psychosocial therapy for people after deliberate self-harm: a register-based, nationwide multicentre study using propensity score matching. Lancet Psychiatry Elsevier. 2015;2(1):49–58. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00083-2.
    1. Wissing L. “I actually had no wish to die – I just could not figure out life” – The Lifeline –suicide prevention through 20 years. [“Egentlig ønskede jeg ikke at dø – jeg kunne bare ikke finde ud af livet” – Livslinien – selvmordsforebyggelse i 20 år]. Informations Forlag; 2015. ISBN: 9788775144853.
    1. Andrews G, Cuijpers P, Craske MG, McEvoy P, Titov N. Computer therapy for the anxiety and depressive disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010;27(6):418–21.
    1. Hedman E, Ljótsson B, Lindefors N. Cognitive behavior therapy via the Internet: a systematic review of applications, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(6):745–64. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.67.
    1. van Spijker BAJ, van Straten A, Kerkhof AJFM. Effectiveness of online self-help for suicidal thoughts: results of a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One Public Libr Sci. 2014;9(2):e90118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090118.
    1. Van Spijker BAJ, Cristina Majo M, Smit F, Van Straten A, Kerkhof AJFM. Reducing suicidal ideation: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial of unguided web-based self-help. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):1–14.
    1. Kerkhof AJFM, van Spijker BAJ, Mokkenstorm JK. Suicide prevention and new technologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Reducing the burden of suicidal thoughts through online cognitive behavioural therapy self help; pp. 50–62.
    1. Kerkhof AJFM, Van Spijker BAJ. Worrying and rumination as proximal risk factors for suicidal behaviour. In: O’Connor RC, Platt S, Gordon J, editors. International handbook of suicide prevention: research, policy and practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. pp. 199–209.
    1. van Spijker BAJ, van Straten A, Kerkhof AJFM. The effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention to reduce suicidal thoughts: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2010;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-25.
    1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ranieri WF. Scale for suicide ideation: psychometric properties of a self-report version. J Clin Psychol. 1988;44(4):499–505. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198807)44:4<499::AID-JCLP2270440404>;2-6.
    1. Bech P, Rasmussen N-A, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W. The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord. 2001;66(2-3):159–64. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00309-8.
    1. Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, Martiny K, Bech P. The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):351–6. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006724.
    1. Bech P, Licht RW, Stage KB, Bech-Andersen G, Søndergaard S, Martiny K. Rating scales for affective disorders: compendium [Rating scales for affektive lidelser: kompendium]. Psykiatrisk Forskningsenhed, Psykiatrisk Hospital. 2005. Available from . Accessed 29 Mar 2016.
    1. O’Sullivan RL, Fava M, Agustin C, Baer L, Rosenbaum JF. Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;95(5):379–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09649.x.
    1. Velting DM. Personality and negative expectancies: trait structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale. Personal Individ Differ. 1999;26(5):913–21. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00194-9.
    1. Stöber J, Bittencourt J. Weekly assessment of worry: an adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for monitoring changes during treatment. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36(6):645–56. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00031-X.
    1. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76. doi: 10.1159/000376585.
    1. Erlangsen A, Fedyszyn I. Danish nationwide registers for public health and health-related research. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(4):333–9. doi: 10.1177/1403494815575193.
    1. Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, Zijlstra-Vlasveld M, Van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Tan Swan S, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P) BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:217. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-217.
    1. Ritterband LM, Ardalan K, Thorndike FP, Magee JC, Saylor DK, Cox DJ, et al. Real world use of an Internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1081.
    1. Karyotaki E, Kleiboer A, Smit F, Turner DT, Pastor AM, Andersson G, et al. Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an “individual patient data” meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2015;45(13):2717–26. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000665.
    1. Christensen H, Griffiths KM, Farrer L. Adherence in Internet interventions for anxiety and depression. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1194.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj