Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING)

Jonathan Chelly, Sandie Mazerand, Sebastien Jochmans, Claire-Marie Weyer, Franck Pourcine, Olivier Ellrodt, Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin, Jean Serbource-Goguel, Oumar Sy, Ly Van Phach Vong, Mehran Monchi, Jonathan Chelly, Sandie Mazerand, Sebastien Jochmans, Claire-Marie Weyer, Franck Pourcine, Olivier Ellrodt, Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin, Jean Serbource-Goguel, Oumar Sy, Ly Van Phach Vong, Mehran Monchi

Abstract

Background: Hypoxia is common during daily nursing procedures (DNPs) routinely performed on mechanically ventilated patients. The impact of automated ventilation on the incidence and severity of blood oxygen desaturation during DNPs remains unknown.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled crossover trial was carried out in a French intensive care unit to compare blood oxygen pulse saturation (SpO2) during DNPs performed on patients mechanically ventilated in automated and conventional ventilation modes (AV and CV, respectively). All patients with FiO2 ≤ 60% and without prone positioning or neuromuscular blocking agents were included. Patients underwent two DNPs on the same day using AV (INTELLiVENT-ASV®) and CV (volume control, biphasic positive airway pressure, or pressure support ventilation) in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent with SpO2 in the acceptable range of 90-95% during the DNP.

Results: Of the 265 included patients, 93% had been admitted for a medical pathology, the majority for acute respiratory failure (52%). There was no difference between the two periods in terms of DNP duration, sedation requirements, or ventilation parameters, but patients had more spontaneous breaths and lower peak airway pressures during the AV period (p < 0.001). The percentage of time spent with SpO2 in the acceptable range during DNPs was longer in the AV period than in the CV period (48 ± 37 vs. 43 ± 37, percentage of DNP period; p = 0.03). After adjustment, AV was associated with a higher number of DNPs carried out with SpO2 in the acceptable range (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.6; p = 0.001) and a lower incidence of blood oxygen desaturation ≤ 85% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.85; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: AV appears to reduce the incidence and severity of blood oxygen desaturation during daily nursing procedures (DNPs) in comparison to CV.

Trial registration: This study was registered in clinical-trial.gov ( NCT03176329 ) in June 2017.

Keywords: Automated ventilation; Mechanical ventilation; Nursing procedure.

Conflict of interest statement

JC and SJ received fees from Hamilton Medical for lecturing. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
I-NURSING trial flow diagram (DNP, daily nursing procedures; CV, conventional ventilation; AV, automated ventilation)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison between conventional and automated ventilation in terms of minimal, mean, and maximal blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) during daily nursing procedures (*p <  0.05)

References

    1. Hall JB. Creating the animated intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S668–S675. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f203aa.
    1. Denehy L, Elliott D. Strategies for post ICU rehabilitation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012;18:503–508. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328357f064.
    1. Krishnagopalan S, Johnson EW, Low LL, Kaufman LJ. Body positioning of intensive care patients: clinical practice versus standards. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:2588–2592. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031.
    1. Goldhill DR, Badacsonyi A, Goldhill AA, Waldmann C. A prospective observational study of ICU patient position and frequency of turning. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:509–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05431.x.
    1. Jakob SM, Parviainen I, Ruokonen E, Hinder R, Uusaro A, Takala J. Increased splanchnic oxygen extraction because of routine nursing procedures. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:483–489. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958821.
    1. Jones AYM, Dean E. Body position change and its effect on hemodynamic and metabolic status. Heart Lung J Crit Care. 2004;33:281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.04.004.
    1. Nyholm L, Steffansson E, Frojd C, Enblad P. Secondary insults related to nursing interventions in neurointensive care: a descriptive pilot study. J Neurosci Nurs J Am Assoc Neurosci Nurses. 2014;46:285–291. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000077.
    1. Tume LN, Baines PB, Lisboa PJG. The effect of nursing interventions on the intracranial pressure in paediatric traumatic brain injury. Nurs Crit Care. 2011;16:77–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00412.x.
    1. de Jong A, Molinari N, de Lattre S, Gniadek C, Carr J, Conseil M, et al. Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project) Crit Care. 2013;17:R74. doi: 10.1186/cc12683.
    1. Engström J, Bruno E, Reinius H, Fröjd C, Jonsson H, Sannervik J, et al. Physiological changes associated with routine nursing procedures in critically ill are common: an observational pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017;61:62–72. doi: 10.1111/aas.12827.
    1. Redaelli S, Zanella A, Milan M, Isgrò S, Lucchini A, Pesenti A, et al. Daily nursing care on patients undergoing venous–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a challenging procedure! J Artif Organs. 2016;19:343–349. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0912-y.
    1. Asfour HI. Oxygen desaturation and nursing practices in critically ill patients. IOSR JNHS. 2016. 10.9790/1959-05218594.
    1. Arnal J-M, Wysocki M, Novotni D, Demory D, Lopez R, Donati S, et al. Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV(R)) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:781–787. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2548-6.
    1. Lellouche F, Bouchard P-A, Simard S, L’Her E, Wysocki M. Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:463–471. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2799-2.
    1. Clavieras N, Wysocki M, Coisel Y, Galia F, Conseil M, Chanques G, et al. Prospective randomized crossover study of a new closed-loop control system versus pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:631–641. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182952608.
    1. Beijers AJR, Roos AN, Bindels AJGH. Fully automated closed-loop ventilation is safe and effective in post-cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:752–753. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3234-7.
    1. Arnal J-M, Garnero A, Novonti D, Demory D, Ducros L, Berric A, et al. Feasibility study on full closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational comparative study. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2013;17:R196. doi: 10.1186/cc12890.
    1. Bialais E, Wittebole X, Vignaux L, Roeseler J, Wysocki M, Meyer J, et al. Closed-loop ventilation mode (IntelliVent®-ASV) in intensive care unit: a randomized trial of ventilation delivered. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:657–668.
    1. Arnal JM, Garnero A, Novotni D, Corno G, Donati SY, Demory D, et al. Closed loop ventilation mode in intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84:58–67.
    1. Arnal J-M, Saoli M, Garnero A. Airway and transpulmonary driving pressures and mechanical powers selected by INTELLiVENT-ASV in passive, mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Heart Lung J Crit Care. 2019. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.11.001.
    1. Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, Donati A, Rinaldi L, Marudi A, et al. Effect of conservative vs conventional oxygen therapy on mortality among patients in an intensive care unit: the oxygen-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:1583. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11993.
    1. O’Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, Mak V. British Thoracic Society Guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017;4:e000170. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000170.
    1. Rivara D, Artucio H, Arcos J, Hiriart C. Positional hypoxemia during artificial ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:436–438. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198405000-00005.
    1. Thomas PJ, Paratz JD, Lipman J, Stanton WR. Lateral positioning of ventilated intensive care patients: a study of oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and adverse events. Heart Lung. 2007;36:277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.10.008.
    1. Mezidi M, Guérin C. Effects of patients positioning on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(19):384. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.50.
    1. Tanskanen P, Kytta J, Randell T. The effect of patient positioning on dynamic lung compliance. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:602–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04750.x.
    1. Maggiore SM, Lellouche F, Pigeot J, Taille S, Deye N, Durrmeyer X, et al. Prevention of endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:1215–1224. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200203-195OC.
    1. Oh H, Seo W. A meta-analysis of the effects of various interventions in preventing endotracheal suction-induced hypoxemia. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12:912–924. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00796.x.
    1. Fernández M-M, Piacentini E, Blanch L, Fernández R. Changes in lung volume with three systems of endotracheal suctioning with and without pre-oxygenation in patients with mild-to-moderate lung failure. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:2210–2215. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2458-3.
    1. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, et al. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1567–1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2.
    1. Singh AK, Sahi MS, Mahawar B, Rajpurohit S. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of pulse oximeters and factors affecting their performance in a tertiary intensive care unit. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. 10.7860/jcdr/2017/24640.9961.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj