Pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of vitamin D3 (70,000 IU) in pregnant and non-pregnant women

Daniel E Roth, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Rubhana Raqib, Robert E Black, Abdullah H Baqui, Daniel E Roth, Abdullah Al Mahmud, Rubhana Raqib, Robert E Black, Abdullah H Baqui

Abstract

Background: Improvements in antenatal vitamin D status may have maternal-infant health benefits. To inform the design of prenatal vitamin D3 trials, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study of single-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in women of reproductive age.

Methods: A single oral vitamin D3 dose (70,000 IU) was administered to 34 non-pregnant and 27 pregnant women (27 to 30 weeks gestation) enrolled in Dhaka, Bangladesh (23°N). The primary pharmacokinetic outcome measure was the change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration over time, estimated using model-independent pharmacokinetic parameters.

Results: Baseline mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 54 nmol/L (95% CI 47, 62) in non-pregnant participants and 39 nmol/L (95% CI 34, 45) in pregnant women. Mean peak rise in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration above baseline was similar in non-pregnant and pregnant women (28 nmol/L and 32 nmol/L, respectively). However, the rate of rise was slightly slower in pregnant women (i.e., lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D on day 2 and higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D on day 21 versus non-pregnant participants). Overall, average 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 19 nmol/L above baseline during the first month. Supplementation did not induce hypercalcemia, and there were no supplement-related adverse events.

Conclusions: The response to a single 70,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 was similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women in Dhaka and consistent with previous studies in non-pregnant adults. These preliminary data support the further investigation of antenatal vitamin D3 regimens involving doses of ≤70,000 IU in regions where maternal-infant vitamin D deficiency is common.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00938600.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of participant screening, exclusions, and enrollment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Blood and urine specimen collection schedules. Participants in “single-dose only” groups were randomized to one of two schedules (A or B) of specimen collection over a period 70 days. Participants in the “weekly dose” groups were similarly randomized to one of two schedules (C or D); however, the analysis of single-dose pharmacokinetics only included those specimens collected up to and including day 7, preceding administration of the 2nd vitamin D dose.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serum [25(OH)D] in non-pregnant (A) and pregnant (B) participants following administration of 70,000 IU vitamin D3 at day 0. Predicted mean [25(OH)D] and 95% confidence intervals were estimated in a random-intercept regression model of ln[25(OH)D] as a function of time.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Albumin-adjusted serum calcium concentration ([Ca]) in non-pregnant (A) and pregnant participants (B) following administration of vitamin D3 70,000 IU at day 0. Dashed horizontal lines represent upper and lower bounds of the reference range. Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were estimated in a linear regression model using GEE.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Calcium:creatinine ratios (Ca:Cr) in spot urine specimens from non-pregnant (A) and pregnant participants (B) following administration of vitamin D3 70,000 IU at day 0. Predicted means and 95% confidence intervals were estimated in a linear regression model using GEE, in which log-transformed Ca:Cr was modeled as a function of time.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Serum and urine biochemistry in a pregnant participant with two episodes of urine ca:cr > 1.0 mmol/mmol and one episode of serum albumin-adjusted [Ca] > 2.60 mmol/L. Vertical line indicates timing of delivery at 39 weeks gestation.

References

    1. Ross AC, Taylor CL, Yaktine AL, Del Valle HB. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium, Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
    1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 495. Vitamin D: screening and supplementation during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:197–198. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f06b.
    1. Specker BL. Does vitamin D during pregnancy impact offspring growth and bone? Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;FirstView:1–8.
    1. Roth DE. Vitamin D, supplementation during pregnancy: safety considerations in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. J Perinatol. 2011;31:449–459. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.203.
    1. Sahu M, Das V, Aggarwal A, Rawat V, Saxena P, Bhatia V. Vitamin D replacement in pregnant women in rural north India: a pilot study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:1157–1159. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.27.
    1. Zeghoud F, Garabedian M, Jardel A, Bernard N, Melchior J. Administration of a single dose of 100,000 U.I. of vitamin D3 in the pregnant woman in winter. The effect on blood calcium level of the newborn infant. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1988;17:1099–1105.
    1. Marwahaa RK, Tandona N, Chopraa S, Agarwala NM, Garga K, Sharmaa B, Kanwara RS, Bhadraa K, Singha S. et al.Vitamin D status in pregnant Indian women across trimesters and different seasons and its correlation with neonatal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Br J Nutr. 2011;106:1383–1389. doi: 10.1017/S000711451100170X.
    1. Roth DE, Shah MR, Black RE, Baqui AH. Vitamin D status of infants in northeastern rural bangladesh: preliminary observations and a review of potential determinants. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28:458–469.
    1. Seamans KM, Cashman KD. Existing and potentially novel functional markers of vitamin D status: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1997S–2008S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27230D.
    1. Armas LA, Hollis BW, Heaney RP. Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5387–5391. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0360.
    1. Ilahi M, Armas LA, Heaney RP. Pharmacokinetics of a single, large dose of cholecalciferol. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:688–691.
    1. Maalouf J, Nabulsi M, Vieth R, Kimball S, El-Rassi R, Mahfoud Z, El-Hajj Fuleihan G. Short- and long-term safety of weekly high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in school children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:2693–2701. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2530.
    1. Wagner D, Hanwell HE, Vieth R. An evaluation of automated methods for measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:1549–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.07.013.
    1. Carter GD, Berry JL, Gunter E, Jones G, Jones JC, Makin HL, Sufi S, Wheeler MJ. Proficiency testing of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) assays. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;121:176–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2010.03.033.
    1. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. Washington: National Academy Press; 1997. Food and Nutrition Board IOM.
    1. Vieth R, Chan PC, MacFarlane GD. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:288–294.
    1. Gordon AY, Salzman P. Optimality of the Holm procedure among general step-down multiple testing procedures. Stat Probability Lett. 2008;78:1878–1884. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.01.055.
    1. Payne RB, Little AJ, Evans RT. Albumin-adjusted calcium concentration in serum increases during normal pregnancy. Clin Chem. 1990;36:142–144.
    1. Romagnoli E, Mascia ML, Cipriani C, Fassino V, Mazzei F, D’Erasmo E, Carnevale V, Scillitani A, Minisola S. Short and long-term variations in serum calciotropic hormones after a single very large dose of ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) or cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in the elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3015–3020. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0350.
    1. Cipriani C, Romagnoli E, Scillitani A, Chiodini I, Clerico R, Carnevale V, Mascia ML, Battista C, Viti R. et al.Effect of a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of cholecalciferol on serum calciotropic hormones in young subjects with vitamin D deficiency: a prospective intervention study. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;95:4771–4777. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0502.
    1. Bacon CJ, Gamble GD, Horne AM, Scott MA, Reid IR. High-dose oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1407–1415. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0814-9.
    1. Weisman Y, Schen RJ, Eisenberg Z, Amarilio N, Graff E, Edelstein-Singer M, Goldray D, Harell A. Single oral high-dose vitamin D3 prophylaxis in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:515–518.
    1. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:1815–1822. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.594.
    1. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: Double blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2341–2357. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.463.
    1. Vähävihu K, Ylianttila L, Kautiainen H, Viljakainen H, Lamberg-Allardt C, Hasan T, Tuohimaa P, Reunala T, Snellman E. Narrowband ultraviolet B course improves vitamin D balance in women in winter. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:848–853.
    1. Bouillon R, Van Assche FA, Van Baelen H, Heyns W, De Moor P. Influence of the vitamin D-binding protein on the serum concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Significance of the free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 concentration. J Clin Invest. 1981;67:589–596. doi: 10.1172/JCI110072.
    1. Haddad JG, Matsuoka LY, Hollis BW, Hu YZ, Wortsman J. Human plasma transport of vitamin D after its endogenous synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:2552–2555. doi: 10.1172/JCI116492.
    1. Heaney RP. Vitamin D, and calcium interactions: functional outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:541S–544S.
    1. Vieth R. How to optimize vitamin D supplementation to prevent cancer, based on cellular adaptation and hydroxylase enzymology. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3675–3684.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj