Evaluation of a Medical and Mental Health Unit compared with standard care for older people whose emergency admission to an acute general hospital is complicated by concurrent 'confusion': a controlled clinical trial. Acronym: TEAM: Trial of an Elderly Acute care Medical and mental health unit

Rowan H Harwood, Sarah E Goldberg, Kathy H Whittamore, Catherine Russell, John Rf Gladman, Rob G Jones, Davina Porock, Sarah A Lewis, Lucy E Bradshaw, Rachel A Elliot, Medical Crises in Older People Study Group (MCOP), Justine Schneider, Simon Conroy, Anthony Avery, Fiona Jurgens, Judy Edmans, Adam Gordon, Bella Robbins, Jane Dyas, Pip Logan, Casey Quinn, Helen Boardman, Matt Franklin, Rowan H Harwood, Sarah E Goldberg, Kathy H Whittamore, Catherine Russell, John Rf Gladman, Rob G Jones, Davina Porock, Sarah A Lewis, Lucy E Bradshaw, Rachel A Elliot, Medical Crises in Older People Study Group (MCOP), Justine Schneider, Simon Conroy, Anthony Avery, Fiona Jurgens, Judy Edmans, Adam Gordon, Bella Robbins, Jane Dyas, Pip Logan, Casey Quinn, Helen Boardman, Matt Franklin

Abstract

Background: Patients with delirium and dementia admitted to general hospitals have poor outcomes, and their carers report poor experiences. We developed an acute geriatric medical ward into a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit over an eighteen month period. Additional specialist mental health staff were employed, other staff were trained in the 'person-centred' dementia care approach, a programme of meaningful activity was devised, the environment adapted to the needs of people with cognitive impairment, and attention given to communication with family carers. We hypothesise that patients managed on this ward will have better outcomes than those receiving standard care, and that such care will be cost-effective.

Methods/design: We will perform a controlled clinical trial comparing in-patient management on a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit with standard care. Study participants are patients over the age of 65, admitted as an emergency to a single general hospital, and identified on the Acute Medical Admissions Unit as being 'confused'. Sample size is 300 per group. The evaluation design has been adapted to accommodate pressures on bed management and patient flows. If beds are available on the specialist Unit, the clinical service allocates patients at random between the Unit and standard care on general or geriatric medical wards. Once admitted, randomised patients and their carers are invited to take part in a follow up study, and baseline data are collected. Quality of care and patient experience are assessed in a non-participant observer study. Outcomes are ascertained at a follow up home visit 90 days after randomisation, by a researcher blind to allocation. The primary outcome is days spent at home (for those admitted from home), or days spent in the same care home (if admitted from a care home). Secondary outcomes include mortality, institutionalisation, resource use, and scaled outcome measures, including quality of life, cognitive function, disability, behavioural and psychological symptoms, carer strain and carer satisfaction with hospital care. Analyses will comprise comparisons of process, outcomes and costs between the specialist unit and standard care treatment groups.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01136148.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomisation and bed management algorithm. Patients with codes <4000 are randomised with stratification according to care home residence or not, and are approached for trial inclusion. Patients with codes >4000 are not randomly allocated, and are not eligible for trial inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trial flow diagram.

References

    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Who cares wins London. 2005.
    1. Alzheimer's Society. Counting the Cost London. 2009.
    1. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Raising the standard London. 2006.
    1. Department of Health. Everybody's Business. London, Department of Health; 2006.
    1. Department of Health. National dementia strategy. London, Department of Health; 2009.
    1. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2001. p. CD000197.
    1. Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet. 1993;342:1032–6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V.
    1. Harwood RH, Porock D, King N, Edwards G, Hammond S, Howe L, Russell C, Howard S, Jones RG, Morrant JD. Development of a specialist medical and mental health unit for older people in an acute general hospital. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010. ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10)
    1. (accessed 28.12.10)
    1. Gladman JRF, Harwood RH, Conroy SP. Days at home: an outcome measure in studies of specialist services providing care for older people. University of Nottingham Medical Crises in Older People discussion paper series. 2010. ISSN 2044-4230 (accessed 28.12.10)
    1. Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L. Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? Lancet. 2001;358:1586–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06652-1.
    1. Langhorne P, Dennis M. Stroke Units: an evidence based approach. BMJ books, London. 1998.
    1. Office of Public Sector Information. Mental Capacity Act 2005.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12:189–98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
    1. Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 Comparison With the Delirium Rating Scale and the Cognitive Test for Delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13:229–242. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13.2.229.
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
    1. Wade DT, Collin CL. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Dis Studies. 1988;10:64–67.
    1. Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44:2308–14.
    1. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 2001;94:521–6.
    1. Robinson B. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. Journal of Gerontology. 1983;38:344–348.
    1. Goldberg D. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) Windsor: NFER-NELSON. 1992.
    1. Brooker D. Person Centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better (Bradford Dementia Group Good Practice Guides) London, Jessica Kingsley. 2006.
    1. Smith SC, Lamping DL, Banerjee S, Harwood R, Foley B, Smith P, Cook JC, Murray J, Prince M, Levin E, Mann A, Knapp M. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2005;9(10):1–93. iii-iv.
    1. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. The Manual of the London Handicap Scale. Nottingham, University of Nottingham; 1995.
    1. Knapp M. Care Service Receipt Inventory.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj