The Impact of Previsit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Activation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Aaron Winn, Onur Asan, Charles Spanbauer, Joni S Williams, Kathryn E Flynn, Melek Somai, Purushottam Laud, Bradley H Crotty, Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Aaron Winn, Onur Asan, Charles Spanbauer, Joni S Williams, Kathryn E Flynn, Melek Somai, Purushottam Laud, Bradley H Crotty

Abstract

Background: Patient-centered care is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values. To provide patient-centered care, clinicians need to know and incorporate patients' context into their communication and care with patients. Patient contextual data (PCD) encompass social determinants of health and patients' needs, values, goals, and preferences relevant to their care. PCD can be challenging to collect as a routine component of the time-limited primary care visit.

Objective: This study aims to determine if patient-provider communication and patient activation are different for patient users and patient nonusers of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated PCD tool and assess if the impact of using PCD on patient-provider communication and patient activation differs for Black and White patients.

Methods: We describe a randomized controlled trial of a prospective cohort of non-Hispanic White and Black patients who receive primary care services at a midwestern academic health care system in the United States. We will evaluate whether providing PCD through a consumer informatics tool enhances patient-provider communication, as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool, and we will evaluate patient activation, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure for PCD tool users and nonusers. Furthermore, owing to racial disparities in care and communication, we seek to determine if the adoption and use of the tool might narrow the differences between patient groups.

Results: The trial was funded in November 2017 and received local ethics review approval in February 2019. The study began recruitment in April 2019 and enrollment concluded in October 2019 with 301 participants. The analysis was completed in May 2020, and trial results are expected to be published in winter 2020.

Conclusions: Recently, there has been increased attention to the role of health information technology tools to enable patients to collaborate with providers through the sharing of PCD. The adoption of such tools may overcome the barriers of current EHRs by directly engaging patients to submit their contextual data. Effectively, these tools would support the EHR in providing a more holistic understanding of the patient. Research further supports that individuals who have robust digital engagement using consumer informatics tools have higher participation in treatment follow-up and self-care across populations. Therefore, it is critical to investigate interventions that elicit and share patients' social risks and care preferences with the health care team as a mechanism to improve individualized care and reduce the gap in health outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766841; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03766841.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR1-10.2196/20309.

Keywords: consumer health informatics; mobile phone; patient participation; patient-centered care; physician-patient relations; randomized controlled trial; vulnerable populations.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Jeana M Holt, Rachel Cusatis, Aaron Winn, Onur Asan, Charles Spanbauer, Joni S Williams, Kathryn E Flynn, Melek Somai, Purushottam Laud, Bradley H Crotty. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 23.09.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomized controlled trial study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient contextual data tool one-screen summary.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Randomized controlled trial Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT).

References

    1. Dzau VJ, McClellan MB, McGinnis JM, Burke SP, Coye MJ, Diaz A, Daschle TA, Frist WH, Gaines M, Hamburg MA, Henney JE, Kumanyika S, Leavitt MO, Parker RM, Sandy LG, Schaeffer LD, Steele GD, Thompson P, Zerhouni E. Vital directions for health and health care: priorities from a national academy of medicine initiative. J Am Med Assoc. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1461–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1964.
    1. Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):100–3. doi: 10.1370/afm.1239.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.
    1. World Health Organization . Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. Denmark, UK: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003.
    1. Holt JM, Cusatis R, Asan O, Williams J, Nukuna S, Flynn KE, Moore J, Crotty BH. Incorporating patient-generated contextual data into care: clinician perspectives using the consolidated framework for implementation science. Healthc (Amst) 2020 Mar;8(1):100369. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.100369.
    1. Institute of Medicine . Primary Care: America's Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996.
    1. Bisognano M, Schummers D. Flipping healthcare: an essay by Maureen Bisognano and Dan Schummers. Br Med J. 2014 Oct 3;349:g5852. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5852.
    1. Cusatis R, Holt JM, Williams J, Nukuna S, Asan O, Flynn KE, Neuner J, Moore J, Makoul G, Crotty BH. The impact of patient-generated contextual data on communication in clinical practice: a qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):734–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.020.
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):520–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2.
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta CD. When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015 Mar;34(3):431–7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0452.
    1. Schwartz A, Weiner SJ, Weaver F, Yudkowsky R, Sharma G, Binns-Calvey A, Preyss B, Jordan N. Uncharted territory: measuring costs of diagnostic errors outside the medical record. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Nov;21(11):918–24. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000832.
    1. Estiri H, Patel C, Murphy S. Informatics can help providers incorporate context into care. JAMIA Open. 2018 Jul;1(1):3–6. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy025.
    1. Ospina NS, Phillips KA, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Gionfriddo MR, Branda ME, Montori VM. Eliciting the patient's agenda- secondary analysis of recorded clinical encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):36–40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4540-5.
    1. Weiner SJ, Schwartz A. Contextual errors in medical decision making: overlooked and understudied. Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):657–62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001017.
    1. Ahmad F, Lou W, Shakya Y, Ginsburg L, Ng PT, Rashid M, Dinca-Panaitescu S, Ledwos C, McKenzie K. Preconsult interactive computer-assisted client assessment survey for common mental disorders in a community health centre: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(1):E190–7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160118.
    1. Lin C, Albertson GA, Schilling LM, Cyran EM, Anderson SN, Ware L, Anderson RJ. Is patients' perception of time spent with the physician a determinant of ambulatory patient satisfaction? Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jun 11;161(11):1437–42. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.11.1437.
    1. Barry C, Bradley C, Britten N, Stevenson F, Barber N. Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study. Br Med J. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1246–50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1246.
    1. Peltenburg M, Fischer JE, Bahrs O, van Dulmen S, van den Brink-Muinen A. The unexpected in primary care: a multicenter study on the emergence of unvoiced patient agenda. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):534–40. doi: 10.1370/afm.241.
    1. Dyson GJ, Thompson K, Palmer S, Thomas DM, Schofield P. The relationship between unmet needs and distress amongst young people with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Jan;20(1):75–85. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1059-7.
    1. Phillips CR, Haase JE. A connectedness primer for healthcare providers: adolescents/young adult cancer survivors' perspectives on behaviors that foster connectedness during cancer treatment and the resulting positive outcomes. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Apr;7(2):174–80. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0056.
    1. Wittink MN, Walsh P, Yilmaz S, Mendoza M, Street RL, Chapman BP, Duberstein P. Patient priorities and the doorknob phenomenon in primary care: can technology improve disclosure of patient stressors? Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.004.
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH, Alvarez C, Overton V. Supporting patient behavior change: approaches used by primary care clinicians whose patients have an increase in activation levels. Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):148–54. doi: 10.1370/afm.1904.
    1. Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Hasnain-Wynia R, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct;26(10):1112–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1728-3.
    1. Smith SG, O'Conor R, Aitken W, Curtis LM, Wolf MS, Goel MS. Disparities in registration and use of an online patient portal among older adults: findings from the LitCog cohort. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):888–95. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv025.
    1. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS, Bates DW. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):568–74. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34.
    1. Kontos E, Blake KD, Chou WS, Prestin A. Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the health information national trends survey 2012. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
    1. Anthony DL, Campos-Castillo C, Lim PS. Who isn't using patient portals and why? Evidence and implications from a national sample of US adults. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018 Dec;37(12):1948–54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05117.
    1. Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Cooper AJ, Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW. Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18(Suppl 1):i8–12. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000473.
    1. Oest SE, Hightower M, Krasowski MD. Activation and utilization of an electronic health record patient portal at an academic medical center-impact of patient demographics and geographic location. Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518797573. doi: 10.1177/2374289518797573.
    1. Walker DM, Hefner JL, Fareed N, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS. Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemed J E Health. 2020 May;26(5):603–13. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0065.
    1. Tarver WL, Menser T, Hesse BW, Johnson TJ, Beckjord E, Ford EW, Huerta TR. Growth dynamics of patient-provider internet communication: trend analysis using the health information national trends survey (2003 to 2013) J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 29;20(3):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7851.
    1. Greenberg-Worisek AJ, Kurani S, Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Tracking healthy people 2020 internet, broadband, and mobile device access goals: an update using data from the health information national trends survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 24;21(6):e13300. doi: 10.2196/13300.
    1. Lazard AJ, Watkins I, Mackert MS, Xie B, Stephens KK, Shalev H. Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e157–61. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv174.
    1. Otte-Trojel T, de Bont A, Rundall TG, van de Klundert J. What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e162–8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv114.
    1. Lyles CR, Fruchterman J, Youdelman M, Schillinger D. Legal, practical, and ethical considerations for making online patient portals accessible for all. Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1608–11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303933.
    1. Chang E, Blondon K, Lyles CR, Jordan L, Ralston JD. Racial/ethnic variation in devices used to access patient portals. Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):e1–8.
    1. Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang C. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the communication assessment tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005.
    1. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1918–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x.
    1. Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Doré CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A. Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149–60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175–91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
    1. Jordan S, Watkins A, Storey M, Allen SJ, Brooks CJ, Garaiova I, Heaven ML, Jones R, Plummer SF, Russell IT, Thornton CA, Morgan G. Volunteer bias in recruitment, retention, and blood sample donation in a randomised controlled trial involving mothers and their children at six months and two years: a longitudinal analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e67912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067912.
    1. i2b2: Informatics for Integrating Biology & the Bedside. [2019-05-04].
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
    1. Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015.
    1. Anderson M, Perrin A, Jiang J, Kumar M. 10% of Americans Don’t Use the Internet. Who Are They? Pew Research Center. 2019. [2019-11-09].
    1. Dyer N, Sorra JS, Smith SA, Cleary PD, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (CAHPS) clinician and group adult visit survey. Med Care. 2012 Nov;(50 Suppl):S28–34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d.
    1. CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [2019-03-23]. .
    1. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873–80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9.
    1. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, Noorbaloochi S, Grill JP, Snyder A, Bradley KA, Nugent SM, Baines AD, Vanryn M. Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5.
    1. Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS 5): Cycle 1 Methodology Report. Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS. 2017. [2020-09-07]. .
    1. Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109–12. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.83221.
    1. Singal AG, Higgins PD, Waljee AK. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 2;5:e45. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2013.13.
    1. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245–51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
    1. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S. Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials. 2012 Feb;9(1):48–55. doi: 10.1177/1740774511420743.
    1. Hernán MA, Robins JM. Per-protocol analyses of pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1391–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsm1605385.
    1. Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse J. The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the First Year. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2011. [2020-09-09]. .
    1. Imbens GW, Angrist JD. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica. 1994 Mar;62(2):467–75. doi: 10.2307/2951620.
    1. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
    1. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. Br Med J. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
    1. SAS Enterprise Miner. 2019. [2020-09-07]. .
    1. Recommendations. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2019. [2019-09-22].
    1. Hatef E, Weiner JP, Kharrazi H. A public health perspective on using electronic health records to address social determinants of health: The potential for a national system of local community health records in the United States. Int J Med Inform. 2019 Apr;124:86–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.012.
    1. Estabrooks PA, Boyle M, Emmons KM, Glasgow RE, Hesse BW, Kaplan RM, Krist AH, Moser RP, Taylor MV. Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(4):575–82. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000576.
    1. Jerant A, Sohler N, Fiscella K, Franks B, Franks P. Tailored interactive multimedia computer programs to reduce health disparities: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):323–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.012.
    1. Adler NE, Stead WW. Patients in context--EHR capture of social and behavioral determinants of health. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):698–701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1413945.
    1. Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Dambrun K, Dearing M, Middendorf M, Mossman N, Hollombe C, Mahr P, Melgar G, Davis J, Gottlieb L, Cottrell E. Adoption of social determinants of health EHR tools by community health centers. Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):399–407. doi: 10.1370/afm.2275.
    1. Casey JA, Pollak J, Glymour MM, Mayeda ER, Hirsch AG, Schwartz BS. Measures of SES for electronic health record-based research. Am J Prev Med. 2018 Mar;54(3):430–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.004.
    1. Capturing Social and Behavioral Domains in Electronic Health Records: Phase 1. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014.
    1. Mafi JN, Gerard M, Chimowitz H, Anselmo M, Delbanco T, Walker J. Patients contributing to their doctors' notes: insights from expert interviews. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):302–5. doi: 10.7326/M17-0583.
    1. Dzau VJ, Balatbat CA. Health and societal implications of medical and technological advances. Sci Transl Med. 2018 Oct 17;10(463):-. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau4778.
    1. Huxley CJ, Atherton H, Watkins JA, Griffiths F. Digital communication between clinician and patient and the impact on marginalised groups: a realist review in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e813–21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687853.
    1. Voruganti T, Grunfeld E, Makuwaza T, Bender JL. Web-based tools for text-based patient-provider communication in chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 27;19(10):e366. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7987.
    1. Pradhan AM, Park L, Shaya FT, Finkelstein J. Consumer health information technology in the prevention of substance abuse: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 30;21(1):e11297. doi: 10.2196/11297.
    1. Wu Y, Linder L, Kanokvimankul P, Fowler B, Parsons B, Macpherson C, Johnson R. Use of a smartphone application for prompting oral medication adherence among adolescents and young adults with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Jan 1;45(1):69–76. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.69-76.
    1. Nathan AG, Marshall IM, Cooper JM, Huang ES. Use of decision aids with minority patients: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):663–76. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3609-2.
    1. Vila PM, Swain GR, Baumgardner DJ, Halsmer SE, Remington PL, Cisler RA. Health disparities in Milwaukee by socioeconomic status. WMJ. 2007 Oct;106(7):366–72.
    1. Milwaukee County Health Rankings. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. [2019-11-05]. .
    1. Community Health Assessement. City of Milwaukee. 2016. [2020-09-07]. .
    1. Frey W. Diversity Explosion: How New Racial Demographics are Remaking America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2018.
    1. Otado J, Kwagyan J, Edwards D, Ukaegbu A, Rockcliffe F, Osafo N. Culturally competent strategies for recruitment and retention of African American populations into clinical trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):460–6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12285.
    1. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1624.
    1. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Feb;32(2):207–14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061.
    1. Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R. Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):30–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002.
    1. Zhao J, Gao S, Wang J, Liu X, Hao Y. Differentiation between two healthcare concepts: person-centered and patient-centered care. Int J Nurs Sci. 2016 Dec;3(4):398–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.08.009.
    1. Chinn P. Critical theory and emancipatory knowing. In: Butts JB, Rich KL, editors. Philosophies and Theories for Advanced Nursing Practice. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2018.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj