Acceptability and Feasibility of Human Papilloma Virus Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening

Kumar Ilangovan, Erin Kobetz, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Erin N Marcus, Brendaly Rodriguez, Yisel Alonzo, Olveen Carrasquillo, Kumar Ilangovan, Erin Kobetz, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Erin N Marcus, Brendaly Rodriguez, Yisel Alonzo, Olveen Carrasquillo

Abstract

Objectives: Women in safety-net institutions are less likely to receive cervical cancer screening. Human papilloma virus (HPV) self-sampling is an alternative method of cervical cancer screening. We examine the acceptability and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff in two safety-net clinics in Miami.

Materials and methods: Haitian and Latina women aged 30-65 years with no Pap smear in the past 3 years were recruited. Women were offered HPV self-sampling or traditional Pap smear screening. The acceptability of HPV self-sampling among patients and clinic staff was assessed. If traditional screening was preferred the medical record was reviewed.

Results: A total of 180 women were recruited (134 Latinas and 46 Haitian). HPV self-sampling was selected by 67% women. Among those selecting traditional screening, 22% were not screened 5 months postrecruitment. Over 80% of women agreed HPV self-sampling was faster, more private, easy to use, and would prefer to use again. Among clinic staff, 80% agreed they would be willing to incorporate HPV self-sampling into practice.

Conclusions: HPV self-sampling was both acceptable and feasible to participants and clinic staff and may help overcome barriers to screening.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj