Reduced Clostridioides difficile infection in a pragmatic stepped-wedge initiative using admission surveillance to detect colonization

Lance R Peterson, Sean O'Grady, Mary Keegan, Adrienne Fisher, Shane Zelencik, Bridget Kufner, Mona Shah, Rachel Lim, Donna Schora, Sanchita Das, Kamaljit Singh, Lance R Peterson, Sean O'Grady, Mary Keegan, Adrienne Fisher, Shane Zelencik, Bridget Kufner, Mona Shah, Rachel Lim, Donna Schora, Sanchita Das, Kamaljit Singh

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) is a persistent healthcare issue. In the US, CDI is the most common infectious cause of hospital-onset (HO) diarrhea.

Objective: Assess the impact of admission testing for toxigenic C. difficile colonization on the incidence of HO-CDI.

Design: Pragmatic stepped-wedge Infection Control initiative.

Setting: NorthShore University HealthSystem is a four-hospital system near Chicago, IL.

Patients: All patients admitted to the four hospitals during the initiative.

Interventions: From September 2017 through August 2018 we conducted a quality improvement program where admitted patients had a peri-rectal swab tested for toxigenic C. difficile. All colonized patients were placed into contact precautions.

Measurements: We tested admissions who: i) had been hospitalized within two months, ii) had a past C. difficile positive test, and/or iii) were in a long-term care facility within six months. We measured compliance with all other practices to reduce the incidence of HO-CDI.

Results: 30% of admissions were tested and 8.3% were positive. In the year prior to the initiative (Period 1) there were 63,057 admitted patients when HO-CDI incidence was 5.96 cases/10,000 patient days. During the 12-month initiative (Period 2) there were 62,760 admissions and the HO-CDI incidence was 4.23 cases/10,000 patient days (p = 0.02). There were no other practice or antibiotic use changes. Continuing admission surveillance provided a HO-CDI incidence of 2.9 cases/10,000 patient days during the final 9 months of 2018 (p<0.0001 compared to Period 1), equaling <1 case/1,000 admissions.

Limitations: This was not a randomized controlled trial, and multiple prevention practices were in place at the time of the admission surveillance initiative.

Conclusion: Admission C. difficile surveillance testing is an important tool for preventing hospital-onset C. difficile infection.

Registration: This quality improvement initiative is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The unique registration identifier number is NCT04014608.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: LRP has been a consultant on novel assay development for Roche Molecular Diagnostics. There are no other disclosures. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Participant flow diagram for the…
Fig 1. Participant flow diagram for the intervention portion of this report.
Fig 2. Monthly incidence of HO-CDI during…
Fig 2. Monthly incidence of HO-CDI during 29 months of observation (S1 Table).
Fig 3
Fig 3
a. and b. Compliance with infection control practices designed to reduce risk of HO-CDI (3a represents Period 1 and 3b represents Period 2; S2 Table).
Fig 4. Antimicrobial agent use (in days…
Fig 4. Antimicrobial agent use (in days of therapy per 1,000 patient days) between the two study periods depicted as total use ±1 S.E.; S3 Table).

References

    1. Guh AY, Kutty PK. Clostridioides difficile Infection. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:ITC49–ITC64. 10.7326/AITC201810020
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Annual report for the Emerging Infections Program for Clostridium difficile infection. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. (Accessed on May 31, 2019).
    1. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:825–834. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408913
    1. Magill SS, O'Leary E, Janelle SJ, Thompson DL, Dumyati G, Nadle J, et al. Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1732–1744. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801550
    1. Abou Chakra CN, Pepin J, Sirad S, Valiquette L. 2014. Risk factors for recurrence, complications and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. PLoS One. 9:e98400 10.1371/journal.pone.0098400 eCollection 2014.
    1. Weaver FM, Trick WE, Evans CT, Lin MY, Adams W, Pho MT, et al. The impact of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection on patients’ prevention behaviors. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:1351–1357. 10.1017/ice.2017.208
    1. McDonald LC, Kutty PK. 2019. Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection: Prevention and control UpToDate topic 2687. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA: (Accessed on May 31, 2019).
    1. Longtin Y, Paquet-Bolduc B, Gilca R, Garenc C, Fortin E, Longtin J, et al. Effect of detecting and isolating Clostridium difficile carriers at hospital admission on the incidence of C. difficile infections: a quasi-experimental controlled study. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:796–804. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0177
    1. Chang S, Sethi AK, Eckstein BC, Stiefel U, Cadnum JL, Donskey CJ. Skin and environmental contamination with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among carriers identified clinically versus through active surveillance. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1423–1428. 10.1086/598505
    1. Guerrero DM, Nerandzic MM, Jury LA, Jinno S, Chang S, Donskey CJ. Acquisition of spores on gloved hands after contact with the skin of patients with Clostridium difficile infection and with environmental surfaces in their rooms. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:556–558. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.08.002
    1. Caroff DA, Yokoe DS, Klompas M. Evolving insights into the epidemiology and control of Clostridium difficile in hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:1232–1238. 10.1093/cid/cix456
    1. Mawer DPC, Eyre DW, Griffiths D, Fawley WN, Martin JSH, Quan TP, et al. Contribution to Clostridium difficile transmission of symptomatic patients with toxigenic strains who are fecal toxin negative. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1163–1170. 10.1093/cid/cix079
    1. Donskey CJ, Sunkesula VCK, Stone ND, Gould CV, McDonald LC, Samore M, et al. Transmission of Clostridium difficile from asymptomatically colonized or infected long-term care facility residents. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:909–916. 10.1017/ice.2018.106
    1. Ridgway JP, Peterson LR, Brown EC, Du H, Hebert C, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, et al. Clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization on hospital admission: one-year infection risk. PlosOne. 2013;8:e79716 10.1371/journal.pone.0079716
    1. Balm MN, Lover AA, Salmon S, Tambyah PA, Fisher DA. Progression from new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization to infection: an observational study in a hospital cohort. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:491 10.1186/1471-2334-13-491
    1. Gerding DN, Lessa FC. The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection inside and outside health care institutions. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:37–50. 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.004
    1. Chang HT, Krezolek D, Johnson S, Parada JP, Evans CT, Gerding DN. Onset of symptoms and time to diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease following discharge from an acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:926–931. 10.1086/519178
    1. Peterson LR, Schora DM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus control in the 21st century: Laboratory involvement affecting disease impact and economic benefit from large population studies. J Clin Micro. 2016;54:2647–2654. 10.1128/JCM.00698-16
    1. McDonald LC, Diekema DJ. Point-Counterpoint: Active surveillance for carriers of toxigenic Clostridium difficile should be performed to guide prevention efforts. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56 pii: e00782-18. 10.1128/JCM.00782-18
    1. Robicsek A, Beaumont JL, Paule SM, Hacek DM, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, et al. Universal surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 affiliated hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:409–418. 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00003 .
    1. Peterson LR, Boehm S, Beaumont JL, Patel PA, Schora DM, Peterson KE, et al. Reduction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in long-term care is possible while maintaining patient socialization: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:1622–1627. 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.251
    1. Patel PA, Schora DM, Singh K, Peterson LR. Validation of active surveillance testing for Clostridium difficile colonization using the cobas Cdiff Test. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:1–7. pii: e01553-17. 10.1128/JCM.01553-17
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018. Strategies to prevent Clostridioides difficile infection in acute care facilities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. (Accessed on March 25, 2019).
    1. McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, et al. Clinical practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:987–994. 10.1093/cid/ciy149
    1. Robicsek A, Beaumont JL, Wright MO, Thomson RB Jr, Kaul KL, Peterson LR. Electronic prediction rules for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32:9–19. 10.1086/657631
    1. Shardell M, Harris AD, El-Kamary SS, Furuno JP, Miller RR, Perencevich EN. Statistical analysis and application of quasi experiments to antimicrobial resistance intervention studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:901–907. 10.1086/521255 .
    1. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Stel VS, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. How to deal with continuous and dichotomic outcomes in epidemiological research: linear and logistic regression analyses. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118:c399–406. 10.1159/000324049
    1. NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute Quality Improvement (QI) Checklist. NorthShore University HealthSystem. Effective date January 15, 2011. (Accessed on May 31, 2019).
    1. Linsesmeyer K, O’Brien W, Brecher SM, Strymish J, Rochman A, Itani K, et al. Clostridium difficile screening of colonization during an outbreak setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:1912–1914. 10.1093/cid/ciy455
    1. Kutty PK, Beekmann SE, Sinkowitz-Cochran RL, Dubberke ER, Kuhar DT, et al. A national survey of testing and management of asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019;40:801–803. 10.1017/ice.2019.109
    1. Bartsch SM, Curry SR, Harrison LH, Lee BY. The potential economic value of screening hospital admissions for Clostridium difficile. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:3163–3171. 10.1007/s10096-012-1681-z
    1. Curry SR, Schlackman JL, Hamilton TM, Henderson TK, Brown NT, et al. Perirectal swab surveillance for Clostridium difficile by use of selective broth preamplification and real-time PCR detection of tcdB. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3788–3793. 10.1128/JCM.00679-11
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2018. Hospital acquired conditions. (Accessed on May 21, 2019).
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Tracking. (Accessed on May 21, 2019).
    1. McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:987–994. 10.1093/cid/ciy149
    1. Anderson DJ, Chen LF, Weber DJ, Moehring RW, Lewis SS, et al. Enhanced terminal room disinfection and acquisition and infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile (the Benefits of Enhanced Terminal Room Disinfection study): a cluster-randomized, multicenter, crossover study. Lancet. 2017;389(10071):805–814. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31588-4
    1. Anderson DJ, Moehring RW, Weber DJ, Lewis SS, Chen LF, et al. Effectiveness of targeted enhanced terminal room disinfection on hospital-wide acquisition and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile: a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with crossover design (BETR Disinfection). Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:845–853. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30278-0
    1. Kundrapu S, Sunkesula V, Jury I, Deshpande A, Donskey CJ. A randomized trial of soap and water hand wash versus alcohol hand rub for removal of Clostridium difficile spores from hands of patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:204–206. 10.1086/674859
    1. Bolon M. Hand hygiene. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25:21–43. 10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.001
    1. Kundrapu S, Sunkesula VC, Jury LA, Cadnum JL, Nerandzic MM, et al. Do piperacillin/tazobactam and other antibiotics with inhibitory activity against Clostridium difficile reduce the risk for acquisition of C. difficile colonization? BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:159–166. 10.1186/s12879-016-1514-2
    1. Fang FC, Polage CR, Wilcox MH. Point-Counterpoint: What is the optimal approach for detection of Clostridium difficile infection? J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:670–680. 10.1128/JCM.02463-16
    1. Kumar N, Browne HP, Vicianti E, Forster SC, Clare S, et al. Adaptation of host transmission cycle during Clostridium difficile speciation. Nature Gen. 10.1038/s41588-019-0478-8
    1. Meltzer E, Smollan G, Huppert A, Fluss R, Tal I, Gilboa M, et al. Universal screening for Clostridioides difficile in a tertiary hospital: risk factors for carriage and clinical disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:1127–1132. 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.002
    1. Baron SW, Ostrowsky BE, Nori P, Drory DY, Levi MH, Szymczak WA, et al. Screening of Clostridioides difficile carriers in an urban academic medical center: Understanding implications of disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41:149–153. 10.1017/ice.2019.309

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj