Improvement of tactile discrimination performance and enlargement of cortical somatosensory maps after 5 Hz rTMS

Martin Tegenthoff, Patrick Ragert, Burkhard Pleger, Peter Schwenkreis, Ann-Freya Förster, Volker Nicolas, Hubert R Dinse, Martin Tegenthoff, Patrick Ragert, Burkhard Pleger, Peter Schwenkreis, Ann-Freya Förster, Volker Nicolas, Hubert R Dinse

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is increasingly used to investigate mechanisms of brain functions and plasticity, but also as a promising new therapeutic tool. The effects of rTMS depend on the intensity and frequency of stimulation and consist of changes of cortical excitability, which often persists several minutes after termination of rTMS. While these findings imply that cortical processing can be altered by applying current pulses from outside the brain, little is known about how rTMS persistently affects learning and perception. Here we demonstrate in humans, through a combination of psychophysical assessment of two-point discrimination thresholds and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), that brief periods of 5 Hz rTMS evoke lasting perceptual and cortical changes. rTMS was applied over the cortical representation of the right index finger of primary somatosensory cortex, resulting in a lowering of discrimination thresholds of the right index finger. fMRI revealed an enlargement of the right index finger representation in primary somatosensory cortex that was linearly correlated with the individual rTMS-induced perceptual improvement indicative of a close link between cortical and perceptual changes. The results demonstrate that repetitive, unattended stimulation from outside the brain, combined with a lack of behavioral information, are effective in driving persistent improvement of the perception of touch. The underlying properties and processes that allow cortical networks, after being modified through TMS pulses, to reach new organized stable states that mediate better performance remain to be clarified.

Figures

Figure 1. Experimental Design
Figure 1. Experimental Design
S1–S5 served to create a stable discrimination performance for the right D2. D4 and the left index finger (D2), serving as controls to assess spatial specificity of the effects, were tested at session S5 (pre-rTMS), because task familiarization has been shown to generalize across fingers. After S5, pre-fMRI measurements were performed, then two rTMS sessions separated by 45 min were applied over the left cortical index finger representation in SI. After the termination of rTMS, in session S6 the post-rTMS condition was measured for both index fingers and the ring finger. Then post-fMRI measurements were repeated. S7–S10 served to assess the recovery of the rTMS-induced effects on thresholds. Recovery of BOLD signals was assessed 3 h after termination of rTMS.
Figure 2. Effects of rTMS on Discrimination…
Figure 2. Effects of rTMS on Discrimination Thresholds
(A) Effects of rTMS on discrimination thresholds on the right index finger. Data represent average from all participants (n = 33). Dots represent mean thresholds, boxes show the standard errors, and whiskers correspond to the standard deviation. rTMS period over of the right index finger representation in left SI is indicated by an arrow. Shown are the baseline measurements from 5 consecutive sessions before rTMS. After session S5 (pre-rTMS condition), rTMS was applied. After rTMS (post-rTMS), discrimination thresholds were significantly reduced. (B) Comparison of the rTMS-induced threshold changes of D2 and D4, and of the time course of recovery (mean ± SEM). For D4, threshold changes were smaller, and persistence of threshold changes was shorter, compared to D2, suggesting that rTMS efficacy drops over a cortical distance spanning the representations between D2 and D4.
Figure 3. Perceptual Effects Evoked by 5…
Figure 3. Perceptual Effects Evoked by 5 Hz TMS
Mean percent changes (± SEM) in discrimination thresholds after rTMS application expressed as post-rTMS relative to pre-rTMS (pre = 100 %). At the bottom, the site of assessment of tactile acuity is given in black, and the site of TMS application is given in blue. Threshold changes are shown for the right index finger after sham rTMS (red); right index finger after rTMS over left representation of right lower leg (yellow); right index finger after rTMS over left representation of right index finger (dark blue); right ring finger after rTMS over left representation of index finger (light blue); and left index finger after rTMS over left representation of right index finger (green).
Figure 4. Effects of rTMS on BOLD…
Figure 4. Effects of rTMS on BOLD Signals
(A) rTMS effect on BOLD signals of a single participant detected pre-rTMS, post-rTMS, and 3 h after rTMS in the left SI ipsilateral to the rTMS site in the postcentral gyrus, and in the contralateral SII in the parietal operculum above the Sylvian fissure. Activations are projected on a rendered T1-weighted MRI dataset. Comparing pre- with post-rTMS fMRI sessions revealed enlarged activation and increased BOLD signal intensity in left SI ipsilateral to the rTMS site. These changes of BOLD signal characteristics recovered 3 h after termination of rTMS. (B) Psychometric functions illustrating the rTMS-induced improvement of discrimination threshold for the individual shown in (A). Correct responses in percent (red squares) are plotted as a function of separation distance together with the results of a logistic regression line (blue with blue diamonds). 50% levels of correct responses are shown as well as thresholds. Top graph, pre-rTMS; middle graph, post-rTMS condition, immediately after rTMS; bottom graph, recovery after 3 h. After rTMS there is a distinct shift in the psychometric functions towards lower separation distances by 0.20 mm, which recovers to pre-rTMS conditions 3 h later (pre-rTMS, 1.75 mm; recovered, 1.72 mm). (C) Random-effect analysis (paired t-test pre-post, right D2 stimulation) revealed significant changes of activated patterns localized in SI ipsilateral to the rTMS stimulated D2 representation (n = 12, pre- versus post-rTMS; threshold, p = 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons; S1-parameters, 32 voxels; T-score = 4.15; x,y,z (mm), −54, −14, 50; Talairach position, postcentral gyrus, Brodmann area 3). (D) No changes of BOLD activity were found in the right hemisphere contralateral to the rTMS site (paired t-test pre- versus post-rTMS, left index finger stimulation; threshold, p = 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons) and in SII. (E) Changes in activation pattern as obtained from random effects analysis (paired t-test pre- versus post-rTMS, right index finger stimulation; compare with [C]), superimposed on a glass brain for visualization. Views are from top (left grid), back (middle grid), and right (right grid).
Figure 5. Cortical Effects Evoked by 5…
Figure 5. Cortical Effects Evoked by 5 Hz TMS
Mean percent changes (± SEM) of the number of activated voxels after rTMS application expressed as post-rTMS relative to pre-rTMS (pre = 100 %). At the bottom, the site of cortical measurement (cortical representation of the index finger D2 in SI) is given in black, and the site of TMS application is given in blue. Shown are cortical changes in activation of the representation of the right index finger in left SI after sham rTMS (red); right index finger in left SI after rTMS over the lower leg representation in left SI (yellow); right index finger in left SI after rTMS over the index finger representation in left SI (blue); and left index finger in right SI after rTMS over the index finger representation in left SI (green).
Figure 6. Relation between Perceptual and Cortical…
Figure 6. Relation between Perceptual and Cortical rTMS-Evoked Changes
Linear correlation analysis (Pearson, r = 0.603, p = 0.037) between individual rTMS induced changes in BOLD signals in SI (difference in activated voxels post-pre) and associated changes of two-point discrimination thresholds post-pre.

References

    1. Grafman J, Wassermann E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can measure and modulate learning and memory. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:159–167.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience—Virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000;10:232–237.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Faz D, Keenan JP. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of “virtual lesions.”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354:1229–1238.
    1. Siebner HR, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: New insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res. 2003;148:1–16.
    1. Klein E, Kreinin I, Chistyakov A, Koren D, Mecz L, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of right prefrontal slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: A double-blind controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56:315–320.
    1. Kauffmann CD, Cheema MA, Miller BE. Slow right prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for medication-resistant depression: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Depress Anxiety. 2004;19:59–62.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Rubio B, Pallordo F, Catala MD. Beneficial effect of rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug resistant depression. Lancet. 1996;348:233–237.
    1. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994;117:847–858.
    1. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, Celnik P, Wassermann EM, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48:1398–1403.
    1. Hebb D. The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley; 1949. 335 pp.
    1. Godde B, Spengler F, Dinse HR. Associative pairing of tactile stimulation induces somatosensory cortical reorganization in rats and humans. Neuroreport. 1996;8:281–285.
    1. Godde B, Stauffenberg B, Spengler F, Dinse HR. Tactile coactivation-induced changes in spatial discrimination performance. J Neurosci. 2000;20:1597–1604.
    1. Pleger B, Dinse HR, Ragert P, Schwenkreis P, Malin JP, et al. Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:12255–12260.
    1. Pleger B, Foerster AF, Ragert P, Dinse HR, Schwenkreis P, et al. Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Neuron. 2003;40:643–653.
    1. Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M. Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science. 2003;301:91–94.
    1. Hodzic A, Veit R, Karim AA, Erb M, Godde B. Improvement and decline in tactile discrimination behavior after cortical plasticity induced by passive tactile coactivation. J Neurosci. 2004;24:442–446.
    1. Ragert P, Schmidt A, Altenmuller E, Dinse HR. Superior tactile performance and learning in professional pianists: Evidence for meta-plasticity in musicians. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:473–478.
    1. Dinse HR, Merzenich MM. Adaptation of inputs in somatosensory system. Fahle M, Poggio T, editors. Perceptual learning. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press; 2002. pp. 19–42.
    1. Watanabe T, Nanez JE, Sasaki Y. Perceptual learning without perception. Nature. 2001;413:844–848.
    1. Ragert P, Becker M, Tegenthoff M, Pleger B, Dinse HR. Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2004;356:91–94.
    1. Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M. GABAergic mechanisms gate tactile discrimination learning. Neuroreport. 2003;14:1747–1751.
    1. Yang TT, Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ, Bloom FE. Noninvasive somatosensory homunculus mapping in humans by using a large-array biomagnetometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:3098–3102.
    1. Nakamura A, Yamada T, Goto A, Kato T, Ito K, et al. Somatosensory homunculus as drawn by MEG. Neuroimage. 1998;7:377–386.
    1. Maldjian JA, Gottschalk A, Patel RS, Detre JA, Alsop DC. The sensory somatotopic map of the human hand demonstrated at 4 Tesla. Neuroimage. 1999;10:55–62.
    1. Classen J, Knorr U, Werhahn KJ, Schlaug G, Kunesch E, et al. Multimodal output mapping of human central motor representation on different spatial scales. J Physiol. 1998;512:163–179.
    1. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme; 1988. 122 pp.
    1. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Grajski KA, Dinse HR. Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. J Neurophysiol. 1992;67:1031–1056.
    1. Recanzone GH, Schreiner CE, Merzenich MM. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J Neurosci. 1993;13:87–103.
    1. Schambra HM, Sawaki L, Cohen LG. Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:130–133.
    1. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Theoret H, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements. Neurology. 2004;62:91–98.
    1. Siebner HR, Peller M, Willoch F, Minoshima S, Boecker H, et al. Lasting cortical activation after repetitive TMS of the motor cortex: A glucose metabolic study. Neurology. 2000;54:956–963.
    1. Craig JC, Qian X. Tactile pattern perception by two fingers: Temporal interference and response competition. Percept Psychophys. 1997;59:252–265.
    1. Schweizer R, Braun C, Fromm C, Wilms A, Birbaumer N. The distribution of mislocalizations across fingers demonstrates training-induced neuroplastic changes in somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2001;139:435–442.
    1. Schoups AA, Vogels R, Orban GA. Human perceptual learning in identifying the oblique orientation: Retinotopy, orientation specificity and monocularity. J Physiol. 1995;483:797–810.
    1. Klaes C, Ragert P, Jancke DE, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR. rTMS induced improvement of human orientation discrimination. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2003;911:22.
    1. Nitsche MA, Fricke K, Henschke U, Schlitterlau A, Liebetanz D, et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J Physiol. 2003;553:293–301.
    1. Rogalewski A, Breitenstein C, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Knecht S. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:313–316.
    1. Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:14–19.
    1. Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Repetitive microstimulation alters the cortical representation of movements in adult rats. Somatosens Mot Res. 1990;7:463–483.
    1. Recanzone GH, Merzenich MM, Dinse HR. Expansion of the cortical representation of a specific skin field in primary somatosensory cortex by intracortical microstimulation. Cereb Cortex. 1992;2:181–196.
    1. Dinse HR, Godde B, Hilger T, Haupt SS, Spengler F, et al. Short-term functional plasticity of cortical and thalamic sensory representations and its implication for information processing. Adv Neurol. 1997;73:159–178.
    1. Dinse HR, Böhmer G. Plastic-adaptive properties of cortical areas. In: Schütz A, Miller R, editors. Cortical areas: Unity and diversity. London: Taylor and Francis; 2002. pp. 311–348.
    1. Godde B, Leonhardt R, Cords SM, Dinse HR. Plasticity of orientation preference maps in the visual cortex of adult cats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6352–6357.
    1. Stoney SD, Thompson WD, Asanuma H. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: Effective extent of stimulating current. J Neurophysiol. 1968;31:659–669.
    1. Heusler P, Cebulla B, Boehmer G, Dinse HR. A repetitive intracortical microstimulation pattern induces long-lasting synaptic depression in brain slices of the rat primary somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2000;135:300–310.
    1. Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Ragert P, Tegenthoff M. Improving haptic perfromance in normal and impaired human populations through unattended activation-based learning. Transaction Appl Perc. 2005;2:71–88.
    1. Karhu J, Tesche CD. Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81:2017–2025.
    1. Wolters A, Sandbrink F, Schlottmann A, Kunesch E, Stefan K, et al. A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:2339–2345.
    1. Boroojerdi B, Prager A, Muellbacher W, Cohen LG. Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54:1529–1531.
    1. Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Hallett M. Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1002–1007.
    1. Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Rothwell JC, Romeo S, Curra A, et al. Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res. 1998;122:79–84.
    1. Peinemann A, Lehner C, Mentschel C, Munchau A, Conrad B, et al. Subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human primary motor cortex reduces intracortical paired-pulse inhibition. Neurosci Lett. 2000;296:21–24.
    1. Wu T, Sommer M, Tergau F, Paulus W. Lasting influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2000;287:37–40.
    1. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Mazzone P, Pilato F, Saturno E, et al. Short-term reduction of intracortical inhibition in the human motor cortex induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2002;147:108–113.
    1. Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Sato S, Kufta C, Hallett M. Attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;81:366–376.
    1. Seyal M, Siddiqui I, Hundal NS. Suppression of spatial localization of a cutaneous stimulus following transcranial magnetic pulse stimulation of the sensorimotor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:24–28.
    1. Knecht S, Ellger T, Breitenstein C, Bernd Ringelstein E, Henningsen H. Changing cortical excitability with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation can induce sustained disruption of tactile perception. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53:175–179.
    1. Satow T, Mima T, Yamamoto J, Oga T, Begum T, et al. Short-lasting impairment of tactile perception by 0.9Hz-rTMS of the sensorimotor cortex. Neurology. 2003;60:1045–1047.
    1. Drager B, Breitenstein C, Helmke U, Kamping S, Knecht S. Specific and nonspecific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on picture-word verification. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:1681–1687.
    1. Herron CE, Lester RA, Coan EJ, Collingridge GL. Frequency-dependent involvement of NMDA receptors in the hippocampus: A novel synaptic mechanism. Nature. 1986;322:265–268.
    1. Stanton PK, Sejnowski TJ. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance. Nature. 1989;339:215–218.
    1. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39.
    1. Morris RG, Moser EI, Riedel G, Martin SJ, Sandin J, et al. Elements of a neurobiological theory of the hippocampus: The role of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:773–786.
    1. Lynch MA. Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:87–136.
    1. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201–206.
    1. Karni A, Sagi D. Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: Evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:4966–4970.
    1. Crist RE, Li W, Gilbert CD. Learning to see: Experience and attention in primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:519–525.
    1. Schoups A, Vogels R, Qian N, Orban G. Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature. 2001;412:549–553.
    1. Fahle M, Poggio T. Perceptual learning. Boston: MIT Press; 2002. 455 pp.
    1. Harris JA, Miniussi C, Harris IM, Diamond ME. Transient storage of a tactile memory trace in primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8720–8725.
    1. Ragert P, Dinse HR, Pleger B, Wilimzig C, Frombach E, et al. Combination of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and tactile coactivation boosts tactile discrimination in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2003;348:105–108.
    1. Kammer T. Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: Their topographic relationship. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37:191–198.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj