Reduction in CD4 central memory T-cell subset in costimulation modulator abatacept-treated patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes is associated with slower C-peptide decline

Tihamer Orban, Craig A Beam, Ping Xu, Keith Moore, Qi Jiang, Jun Deng, Sarah Muller, Peter Gottlieb, Lisa Spain, Mark Peakman, Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Abatacept Study Group, Tihamer Orban, Craig A Beam, Ping Xu, Keith Moore, Qi Jiang, Jun Deng, Sarah Muller, Peter Gottlieb, Lisa Spain, Mark Peakman, Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Abatacept Study Group

Abstract

We previously reported that continuous 24-month costimulation blockade by abatacept significantly slows the decline of β-cell function after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. In a mechanistic extension of that study, we evaluated peripheral blood immune cell subsets (CD4, CD8-naive, memory and activated subsets, myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, monocytes, B lymphocytes, CD4(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cells, and invariant NK T cells) by flow cytometry at baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 30 months after treatment initiation to discover biomarkers of therapeutic effect. Using multivariable analysis and lagging of longitudinally measured variables, we made the novel observation in the placebo group that an increase in central memory (CM) CD4 T cells (CD4(+)CD45R0(+)CD62L(+)) during a preceding visit was significantly associated with C-peptide decline at the subsequent visit. These changes were significantly affected by abatacept treatment, which drove the peripheral contraction of CM CD4 T cells and the expansion of naive (CD45R0(-)CD62L(+)) CD4 T cells in association with a significantly slower rate of C-peptide decline. The findings show that the quantification of CM CD4 T cells can provide a surrogate immune marker for C-peptide decline after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and that costimulation blockade may exert its beneficial therapeutic effect via modulation of this subset.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00505375.

© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage change from baseline of CD4 T-cell subsets identified as representing naive (A) and CM (B) cell populations, as well as the naive cell/CM cell ratio (C) and Treg populations (D). Closed circles represent abatacept-treated subjects, and open circles represent placebo-treated subjects; symbols represent the median, and error bars represent 95% CIs. P values and dashed lines indicate that the two groups differ significantly over the time points indicated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative flow cytomteric analyses of gated CD4 T cell–naive (CD45R0−CD62L+) and CM T cell (CD45R0+CD62L+) subpopulations at different time points during the study in which patients were receiving maintenance therapy (abatacept or placebo) when tested at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, at which point treatment ceased. Numbers in quadrants are the percentages of each subset. A: Lysed whole-blood staining of a type 1 diabetes patient from the placebo group. There is no notable change in the percentage of CM cells (top right quadrant) or the percentage of naive cells (bottom right quadrant). B: A patient in the abatacept-treated arm of the study, in whom there is marked change in the proportion of circulating CM (reduced) and naive (increased) CD4 T cells, respectively. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Log change in C-peptide 2 years after baseline vs. log change in the percentage of CD4+ CM T cells at 1 year. Filled circles represent abatacept-treated subjects, and open circles represent placebo-treated subjects. Lines represent regression estimates from the fitted statistical model: abatacept, solid line; placebo, dashed line.

References

    1. Herold KC, Vignali DA, Cooke A, Bluestone JA. Type 1 diabetes: translating mechanistic observations into effective clinical outcomes. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:243–256
    1. Stiller CR, Dupré J, Gent M, et al. Effects of cyclosporine immunosuppression in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of recent onset. Science 1984;223:1362–1367
    1. Harrison LC, Colman PG, Dean B, Baxter R, Martin FI. Increase in remission rate in newly diagnosed type I diabetic subjects treated with azathioprine. Diabetes 1985;34:1306–1308
    1. Orban T, Farkas K, Jalahej H, et al. Autoantigen-specific regulatory T cells induced in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus by insulin B-chain immunotherapy. J Autoimmun 2010;34:408–415
    1. Wherrett DK, Bundy B, Becker DJ, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet GAD Study Group Antigen-based therapy with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) vaccine in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2011;378:319–327
    1. Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, et al. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1692–1698
    1. Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, et al. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2598–2608
    1. Pescovitz MD, Greenbaum CJ, Krause-Steinrauf H, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Anti-CD20 Study Group Rituximab, B-lymphocyte depletion, and preservation of beta-cell function. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2143–2152
    1. Orban T, Bundy B, Becker DJ, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Abatacept Study Group Co-stimulation modulation with abatacept in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:412–419
    1. Matthews JB, Staeva TP, Bernstein PL, Peakman M, von Herrath M, ITN-JDRF Type 1 Diabetes Combination Therapy Assessment Group Developing combination immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes: recommendations from the ITN-JDRF Type 1 Diabetes Combination Therapy Assessment Group. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;160:176–184
    1. Roep BO, Peakman M. Surrogate end points in the design of immunotherapy trials: emerging lessons from type 1 diabetes. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:145–152
    1. Bluestone JA, St Clair EW, Turka LA. CTLA4Ig: bridging the basic immunology with clinical application. Immunity 2006;24:233–238
    1. Marelli-Berg FM, Okkenhaug K, Mirenda V. A two-signal model for T cell trafficking. Trends Immunol 2007;28:267–273
    1. Farber DL, Yudanin NA, Restifo NP. Human memory T cells: generation, compartmentalization and homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:24–35
    1. Lozanoska-Ochser B, Klein NJ, Huang GC, Alvarez RA, Peakman M. Expression of CD86 on human islet endothelial cells facilitates T cell adhesion and migration. J Immunol 2008;181:6109–6116
    1. Scarsi M, Ziglioli T, Airò P. Decreased circulating CD28-negative T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with abatacept are correlated with clinical response. J Rheumatol 2010;37:911–916
    1. Scarsi M, Ziglioli T, Airò P. Baseline numbers of circulating CD28-negative T cells may predict clinical response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2011;38:2105–2111
    1. Álvarez-Quiroga C, Abud-Mendoza C, Doníz-Padilla L, et al. CTLA-4-Ig therapy diminishes the frequency but enhances the function of Treg cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Immunol 2011;31:588–595
    1. Herold KC, Pescovitz MD, McGee P, et al. Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Anti-CD20 Study Group Increased T cell proliferative responses to islet antigens identify clinical responders to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) therapy in type 1 diabetes. J Immunol 2011;187:1998–2005
    1. Cernea S, Herold KC. Monitoring of antigen-specific CD8 T cells in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with antiCD3 monoclonal antibodies. Clin Immunol 2010;134:121–129

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj