The effect of the Alive & Thrive initiative on exclusive breastfeeding in rural Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trial

Jenny A Cresswell, Rasmané Ganaba, Sophie Sarrassat, Henri Somé, Abdoulaye Hama Diallo, Simon Cousens, Veronique Filippi, Jenny A Cresswell, Rasmané Ganaba, Sophie Sarrassat, Henri Somé, Abdoulaye Hama Diallo, Simon Cousens, Veronique Filippi

Abstract

Background: The benefits of exclusive breastfeeding on mortality, health, and development of children have been well documented. In Burkina Faso, the Alive & Thrive initiative combined interpersonal communication and community mobilisation activities with the aim of improving knowledge, beliefs, skills, and, ultimately, breastfeeding outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the Alive & Thrive initiative on exclusive breastfeeding in Boucle du Mouhoun, Burkina Faso.

Methods: We did a cluster-randomised trial with data collected with two independent, population-representative, cross-sectional surveys: a baseline survey done before the start of the initiative implementation and an endline survey done 2 years later. Rural villages in Boucle du Mouhoun, Burkina Faso, were randomly allocated by use of computer generated pseudo-random numbers, and women were eligible for participation if they had a livebirth in the 12 months preceding the survey and resided in a village selected for the study. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding among infants younger than 6 months. Masking was not possible for the intervention implementation. All women who participated in the trial were included in the analysis population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02435524.

Findings: Between June 2 and July 28, 2015, 2288 mothers participated in the baseline survey and between June 12 and July 25, 2017, 2253 mothers participated in the endline survey. At endline, there was a risk difference of 38·9% (95% CI 32·2-45·6, p<0·001) between the reported prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in the intervention group and that of the control group.

Interpretation: A multidimensional intervention deliverable at scale in a low-income setting resulted in substantial increases in mothers' optimal breastfeeding knowledge and beliefs and in reported exclusive breastfeeding practices. However, it is possible that the findings might have been influenced by social desirability bias.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flow chart of participant recruitment

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490.
    1. WHO. UNICEF . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2003. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding.
    1. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016;387:491–504.
    1. Haroon S, Das JK, Salam RA, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(suppl 3):S20.
    1. Imdad A, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA. Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on breastfeeding rates, with special focus on developing countries. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(suppl 3):S24.
    1. Kim SK, Park S, Oh J, Kim J, Ahn S. Interventions promoting exclusive breastfeeding up to six months after birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;80:94–105.
    1. Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar MJ. Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:114–134.
    1. Sanghvi T, Haque R, Roy S. Achieving behaviour change at scale: Alive & Thrive's infant and young child feeding programme in Bangladesh. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12:141–154.
    1. Tylleskar T, Jackson D, Meda N. Exclusive breastfeeding promotion by peer counsellors in sub-Saharan Africa (PROMISE-EBF): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378:420–427.
    1. Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie. Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances . ICF International; Calverton, MD: 2012. Burkina Faso Enquête Démographique et de Santé et à Indicateurs Multiples 2010 (EDSBF-MICS IV)
    1. Bhutta ZA, Labbok M. Scaling up breastfeeding in developing countries. Lancet. 2011;378:378–380.
    1. Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:957–979.
    1. Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances. Secretariat General. Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie. Direction regionale des Haut Bassins . Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie; Ouagadougou: 2015. Tableau de bord 2014 de la région de la Boucle du Mouhoun.
    1. Cresswell JA, Ganaba R, Sarrassat S. Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding and consumption of soft, semi-solid or solid food among infants in Boucle du Mouhoun, Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179593.
    1. Institut national de la statistique et de la démographie . Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie; Ouagadougou: 2014. Annuaire statistique 2013.
    1. WHO. USAID. AED. IFPRI. UNICEF . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2007. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices—part 1: definitions.
    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Taylor & Francis; London: 2009. Cluster randomised trials.
    1. Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie. Ministère de l'Économie et des Finances. ICF International . ICF International; Calverton, MD: 2012. Burkina Faso enquête démographique et de santé et à indicateurs multiples 2010 (EDSBF-MICS IV)
    1. Cummings P. Methods for estimating adjusted risk ratios. Stata J. 2009;9:175–196.
    1. Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Upadhyay RP. Integrated interventions delivered in health systems, home, and community have the highest impact on breastfeeding outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr. 2017;147:2179S–2187S.
    1. Menon P, Nguyen PH, Saha KK. Impacts on breastfeeding practices of at-scale strategies that combine intensive interpersonal counseling, mass media, and community mobilization: results of cluster-randomized program evaluations in Bangladesh and Viet Nam. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002159.
    1. Kim SS, Rawat R, Mwangi EM. Exposure to large-scale social and behavior change communication interventions is associated with improvements in infant and young child feeding practices in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164800.
    1. Ministère de la Santé . Ministère de la Santé; Ouagadougou: 2016. Enquete nutritionnelle nationale 2016.
    1. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet. 2010;376:1261–1271.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj