Evaluation of a comprehensive maternal newborn health intervention in rural Tanzania: single-arm pre-post coverage survey results

Dismas Matovelo, Maendeleo Boniphace, Nalini Singhal, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Jerome Kabakyenga, Eleanor Turyakira, Hannah Faye G Mercader, Sundus Khan, Girles Shaban, Teddy Kyomuhangi, Amy J Hobbs, Kimberly Manalili, Leonard Subi, Jennifer Hatfield, Sospatro Ngallaba, Jennifer L Brenner, Dismas Matovelo, Maendeleo Boniphace, Nalini Singhal, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Jerome Kabakyenga, Eleanor Turyakira, Hannah Faye G Mercader, Sundus Khan, Girles Shaban, Teddy Kyomuhangi, Amy J Hobbs, Kimberly Manalili, Leonard Subi, Jennifer Hatfield, Sospatro Ngallaba, Jennifer L Brenner

Abstract

Background: In Tanzania, maternal and newborn deaths can be prevented via quality facility-based antenatal care (ANC), delivery, and postnatal care (PNC). Scalable, integrated, and comprehensive interventions addressing demand and service-side care-seeking barriers are needed.

Objective: Assess coverage survey indicators before and after a comprehensive maternal newborn health (MNH) intervention in Misungwi District, Tanzania.

Methods: A prospective, single-arm, pre- (2016) and post-(2019) coverage survey (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02506413) was used to assess key maternal and newborn health (MNH) outcomes. The Mama na Mtoto intervention included district activities (planning, leadership training, supportive supervision), health facility activities (training, equipment, infrastructure upgrades), and plus community health worker mobilization. Implementation change strategies, a process model, and a motivational framework incorporated best practices from a similar Ugandan intervention. Cluster sampling randomized hamlets then used 'wedge sampling' protocol as an alternative to full household enumeration. Key outcomes included: four or more ANC visits (ANC4+); skilled birth attendant (SBA); PNC for mother within 48 hours (PNC-woman); health facility delivery (HFD); and PNC for newborn within 48 hours (PNC-baby). Trained interviewers administered the 'Real Accountability: Data Analysis for Results Coverage Survey to women 15-49 years old. Descriptive statistics incorporated design effect; the Lives Saved Tool estimated deaths averted based on ANC4+/HFD.

Results: Between baseline (n = 2,431) and endline (n = 2,070), surveys revealed significant absolute percentage increases for ANC4+ (+11.6, 95% CI [5.4, 17.7], p < 0.001), SBA (+16.6, 95% CI [11.1, 22.0], p < 0.001), PNC-woman (+9.2, 95% CI [3.2, 15.2], p = 0.002), and HFD (+17.2%, 95% CI [11.3, 23.1], p < 0.001). A PNC-baby increase (+6.1%, 95% CI [-0.5, 12.8], p = 0.07) was not statistically significant. An estimated 121 neonatal and 20 maternal lives were saved between 2016 and 2019.

Conclusions: Full-district scale-up of a comprehensive MNH package embedded government health system was successfully implemented over a short time and associated with significant maternal care-seeking improvements and potential for lives saved.

Keywords: Africa; Pregnancy; delivery; infant health; maternal health; obstetric.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mama na Mtoto logic model showing the two research objective pathways.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mama na Mtoto package activities.

References

    1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, United Nations Population Division . Trends in maternal mortality: 2000-2017. Geneva; 2019.
    1. UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, Division UDP . Number of neonatal deaths: the World Bank; 2021. [cited 2021 Sep 22]. Available from:
    1. USAID . Africa key facts and figures for child mortality: global development commons. 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 5]. Available from: .
    1. Tekelab T, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D.. The impact of antenatal care on neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):9–11. Epub 2019/09/14.
    1. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Lancet maternal survival series steering. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1189–1200.
    1. Sines E, Syed U, Wall S, Worley H. Postnatal care: a critical opportunity to save mothers and newborns. Save the Children; 2007.
    1. Ministry of Health, Community Development, MoHCDGEC, Ministry of Health, National Bureau of Statistics, Office of the Chief Government Statistician, et al. Tanzania: demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey 2015-2016. Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) and Rockville (MD); 2016, Maryland, USA: MoHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, and ICF.
    1. Bintabara D, Ernest A, Mpondo B. Health facility service availability and readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in a low-resource setting: evidence from a Tanzania National Survey. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):4–6.
    1. Maswanya E, Muganyizi P, Kilima S, Mogella D, Massaga J. Practice of emergency obstetric care signal functions and reasons for non-provision among health centers and hospitals in Lake and Western zones of Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):2–5.
    1. Miltenburg AS, Kiritta RF, Meguid T, Sundby J. Quality of care during childbirth in Tanzania: identification of areas that need improvement. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):4–10.
    1. McMahon SA, George AS, Chebet JJ, Mosha IH, Mpembeni RN, Winch PJ. Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro region, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:4–11.
    1. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman LP. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(1):e29–33.
    1. Sando D, Ratcliffe H, McDonald K, Spiegelman D, Lyatuu G, Mwanyika-Sando M, et al. The prevalence of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:236. Epub 2016/08/21.
    1. Larsen A, Exavery A, Phillips JF, Tani K, Kante AM. Predictors of health care seeking behavior during pregnancy, delivery, and the postnatal period in rural Tanzania. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(8):1726–1734. Epub 2016/05/20. PubMed PMID: 27194528.
    1. Greenspan JA, Chebet JJ, Mpembeni R, Mosha I, Mpunga M, Winch PJ, et al. Men’s roles in care seeking for maternal and newborn health: a qualitative study applying the three delays model to male involvement in Morogoro region, Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):293. Epub 2019/08/15.
    1. Boniphace M, Matovelo D, Laisser R, Swai H, Yohani V, Tinka S, et al. Men perspectives on attending antenatal care visits with their pregnant partners in Misungwi district, rural Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):93. Epub 2021/01/30.
    1. Mweteni W, Kabirigi J, Matovelo D, Laisser R, Yohani V, Shabani G, et al. Implications of power imbalance in antenatal care seeking among pregnant adolescents in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0250646.
    1. Hanson C, Cox J, Mbaruku G, Manzi F, Gabrysch S, Schellenberg D, et al. Maternal mortality and distance to facility-based obstetric care in rural southern Tanzania: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional census data in 226 000 households. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(7):387–395. Epub 2015/05/26.
    1. Matovelo D, Ndaki P, Yohani V, Laisser R, Bakalemwa R, Ndaboine E, et al. Why don’t illiterate women in rural, Northern Tanzania, access maternal healthcare? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):452. Epub 2021/06/30.
    1. Mahiti GR, Mkoka DA, Kiwara AD, Mbekenga CK, Hurtig AK, Goicolea I. Women’s perceptions of antenatal, delivery, and postpartum services in rural Tanzania. Global Health Action. 2015;8:28567. Epub 2015/10/27.
    1. Exavery A, Kante AM, Njozi M, Tani K, Doctor HV, Hingora A, et al. Access to institutional delivery care and reasons for home delivery in three districts of Tanzania. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:48. Epub 2014/06/18. PubMed PMID: 24934657.
    1. Brenner JL, Kyomuhangi T, Turyakira E, Nettel-Aguirre A, Singhal N, Singh G, et al. District scale-up of an integrated MNCH initiative in rural southwest Uganda: pre-post intervention coverage survey. 2016.
    1. Healthy Child Uganda . The Mama Toto package 2015. [updated 2015; cited 2021 Nov 9]. Available from:
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–226. Epub 2012/02/09.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327. PubMed PMID: 10474547.
    1. Amouzo A, Bryce J, Walker N; JHU Radar Team . Strengthening effectiveness evaluations to improve programs for women, children and adolescents. Global Health Action. 2022;15. DOI:10.1080/16549716.2021.2006423
    1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health . The real accountability: data analysis for results (RADAR) survey 2016. [cited 2021 Nov 9]. Available from:
    1. Munos MK, Maïga A, Sawadogo-Lewis T, Wilson E, Ako O, Mkuwa S, et al. The RADAR coverage tool: developing a toolkit for rigorous household surveys for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health & nutrition indicators. Global Health Action. 2022;15. DOI:10.1080/16549716.2021.2006419
    1. Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics . Sub-divisional population projection for year 2016 and 2017 based on 2012 population and housing census. 2016.
    1. Mama na Mtoto . Maximizing Engagement for Readiness and Impact (MERI). 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 8]. Available from:
    1. Smith PG, Morrow RH, Ross DA. Chapter 5: trial size. Field trials of health interventions: a toolbox. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Hartung C, Lerer A, Anokwa Y, Tseng C, Brunette W, Borriello G, editors. Open data kit: tools to build information services for developing regions. ICTD ’10: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2010.
    1. R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 3.3.2rd ed. 2016.
    1. StataCorp LLC . Stata: software for statistics and data science. 2017.
    1. StataCorp . STATA survey data reference manual - release 13. College Station (TX); 2013. StataCorp LP.
    1. Walker N, Tam Y, F IK. Overview of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). BMC Public Health. 2013;13(3):1–6.
    1. Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Muhumuza Kananura R, Tetui M, Namazzi G, Mutebi A, George A, et al. Effect of a participatory multisectoral maternal and newborn intervention on maternal health service utilization and newborn care practices: a quasi-experimental study in three rural Ugandan districts. Global Health Action. 2017;10:21–26. Epub 2017/09/06.
    1. Serbanescu F, Clark TA, Goodwin MM, Nelson LJ, Boyd MA, Kekitiinwa AR, et al. Impact of the saving mothers, giving life approach on decreasing maternal and perinatal deaths in Uganda and Zambia. Global Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(Suppl 1):S27–47.
    1. Conlon CM, Serbanescu F, Marum L, Healey J, LaBrecque J, Hobson R, et al. Saving mothers, giving life: it takes a system to save a mother (Republication). Global Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(1):20–40. Epub 2019/03/31.
    1. Magge H, Chilengi R, Jackson EF, Wagenaar BH, Kante AM, Collaborative APP. Tackling the hard problems: implementation experience and lessons learned in newborn health from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(3):829. Epub 2018/01/04.
    1. Jennings MC, Pradhan S, Schleiff M, Sacks E, Freeman PA, Gupta S, et al. Comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary health care in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: 2. maternal health findings. J Global Health. 2017;7(1). DOI:10.7189/jogh.07.010902. Epub 2017/07/08.
    1. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(2):69–79. Epub 2004/02/26. PubMed PMID: 14982885.
    1. McCoy D, Storeng K, Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Osrin D, Borchert M, et al. Maternal, neonatal and child health interventions and services: moving from knowledge of what works to systems that deliver. Int Health. 2010;2:87–98.
    1. Iwelunmor J, Blackstone S, Veira D, Nwaozuru U, Airhihenbuwa C, Munodawafa D, et al. Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework. Implement Sci. 2016;11:43. Epub 2016/03/24.
    1. Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV, Huicho L, Vesel L, Lackritz E, et al. Every newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):438–454. Epub 2014/05/24.
    1. Gilmore B, McAuliffe E. Effectiveness of community health workers delivering preventive interventions for maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:847. Epub 2013/09/17.
    1. Sacks E, Freeman PA, Sakyi K, Jennings MC, Rassekh BM, Gupta S, et al. Comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary health care in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: 3. neonatal health findings. J Global Health. 2017;7(1). DOI:10.7189/jogh.07.010903. Epub 2017/07/08.
    1. Grittner AM. Results-based financing - evidence from performance-based financing in the health sector. German Development Institute; 2013. Jun. (Report No).
    1. Mama na Mtoto . Replicating the Mama Toto programme in rural Tanzania - final process evaluation report. 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 5]. Available from:
    1. Johns Hopkins University . RADAR coverage survey sampling guidelines 2020. [cited 2021 Nov 8]. Available from:
    1. Zivetz L, Ceka J, Robbings K. Building the evidence base for post-project evaluation: case study review and evaluability checklist. Valuing Voices; 2017.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj