Reviewing dengue: still a neglected tropical disease?

Olaf Horstick, Yesim Tozan, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Olaf Horstick, Yesim Tozan, Annelies Wilder-Smith

Abstract

Dengue is currently listed as a "neglected tropical disease" (NTD). But is dengue still an NTD or not? Classifying dengue as an NTD may carry advantages, but is it justified? This review considers the criteria for the definition of an NTD, the current diverse lists of NTDs by different stakeholders, and the commonalities and differences of dengue with other NTDs. We also review the current research gaps and research activities and the adequacy of funding for dengue research and development (R&D) (2003-2013). NTD definitions have been developed to a higher precision since the early 2000s, with the following main features: NTDs are characterised as a) poverty related, b) endemic to the tropics and subtropics, c) lacking public health attention, d) having poor research funding and shortcomings in R&D, e) usually associated with high morbidity but low mortality, and f) often having no specific treatment available. Dengue meets most of these criteria, but not all. Although dengue predominantly affects resource-limited countries, it does not necessarily only target the poor and marginalised in those countries. Dengue increasingly attracts public health attention, and in some affected countries it is now a high profile disease. Research funding for dengue has increased exponentially in the past two decades, in particular in the area of dengue vaccine development. However, despite advances in dengue research, dengue epidemics are increasing in frequency and magnitude, and dengue is expanding to new areas. Specific treatment and a highly effective vaccine remain elusive. Major research gaps exist in the area of integrated surveillance and vector control. Hence, although dengue differs from many of the NTDs, it still meets important criteria commonly used for NTDs. The current need for increased R&D spending, shared by dengue and other NTDs, is perhaps the key reason why dengue should continue to be considered an NTD.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Dengue R&D funding by type…
Fig 1. Dengue R&D funding by type of funder, 2007–2012 (US $).
Global dengue research and development funding tabulated by type of funder, private, philanthropic, or public funding, using data from G-Finder public search facility, adjusting 2008–2012 funding data for inflation and reporting in 2007 US $. https://gfinder.policycures.org/PublicSearchTool/.
Fig 2. Dengue R&D funding by product…
Fig 2. Dengue R&D funding by product area, 2007–2012 (US $).
Global dengue research and development funding tabulated by product area, basic research, diagnostics, drugs, vaccines, vector control products, and unspecified, using data from G-Finder public search facility, adjusting 2008–2012 funding data for inflation and reporting in 2007 US $. https://gfinder.policycures.org/PublicSearchTool/.

References

    1. Murray NE, Quam MB, Wilder-Smith A (2013) Epidemiology of dengue: past, present and future prospects. Clinical epidemiology 5: 299–309 10.2147/CLEP.S34440
    1. WHO (2012/1) Global Strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012–2020, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW et al. (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue, Nature 2013, Volume 496, pp 504–507 10.1038/nature12060
    1. WHO (2013) World Malaria Report 2013, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. WHO (2003) Intensified Control of Neglected Diseases, Report of an International Workshop, Berlin, 10–12 December 2003, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. WHO (2005) Report on strategic and technical meeting on intensified control of neglected tropical diseases, World Health Organization (2006), WHO/CDS/NTD/2006.1, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Sabchareon A, Wallace D, Sirivichayakul C, Limkittikul K, Chanthavanich P et al. (2012) Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial, The Lancet, September 11, 2012 10.1186/1687-4153-2012-11
    1. Erlanger TE, Keiser J, Utzinger J (2008) Effect of dengue vector control interventions on entomological parameters in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2008) Volume 22, pp 203–221 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00740.x
    1. Runge-Ranzinger S, Horstick O, Marx M, Kroeger A (2008) What does dengue disease surveillance contribute to predicting and detecting outbreaks and describing trends, TMIH August 2008, Volume 13 No 8 pp 1022–1041 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02112.x
    1. Jaenisch T, Sakuntabhai A, Wilder-Smith A (2013) Dengue Research Funded by the European Commission: Scientific Strategies of Three European Dengue Research Consortia, PLOS NTD, December 2013, Vol 7, Issue 12, e2320, pp 1–9 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002320
    1. WHO (2007/1) Annual Report 2006 Neglected Tropical Diseases, WHO/CDS/NTD/2007.4, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. WHO (2012/2) Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases, a roadmap for implementation, Geneva, Switzerland, WHO/HTM/NTD/2012.1
    1. CDC (2014) Which diseases are considered Neglected Tropical Diseases? CDC, Atlanta, USA, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. WHO (2014/1) Neglected Tropical Diseases, Diseases covered by the NTD department (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Cochrane (2014) Special collection: Neglected Tropical Diseases, London, United Kingdom (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A, Savioli L, Molyneux DH (2009) Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases, Lancet 2009; 373: pp 1570–75 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60233-6
    1. WHO (2010/1) Equity, social determinants and public health programmes. World Health Organization 2010, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. The Guardian (2014) Football fans warned about dengue fever risk at Fifa World Cup in Brazil, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Horstick O, Runge-Ranzinger S, Nathan MB, Kroeger A (2010) Dengue vector control services: how do they work; a systematic literature review and country case studies, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2010, Volume 104, Issue 6, pp 379–386
    1. Carrasco LR, Lee LK, Lee VJ, Ooi EE, Shepard DS et al. (2011) Economic Impact of Dengue Illness and the Cost-Effectiveness of Future Vaccination Programs in Singapore, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Foo W, Earnest A, Sremulanathan S, Paton NI (2004) Seroepidemiology of dengue in the adult population of Singapore. Trop Med Int Health. 2004 February;9(2):305–8.
    1. Thomas SJ (2014) Developing a dengue vaccine: progress and future challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1323: 140–159. 10.1111/nyas.12413
    1. Villar L, Dayan GH, Arredondo-García JL, Rivera DM, Cunha R et al. (2014) Efficacy of a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Children in Latin America, N Engl J Med 372: 113–123. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411037
    1. Capeding MR, Tran NH, Hadinegoro SR, Ismail HI, Chotpitayasunondh T et al. (2014) Clinical efficacy and safety of a novel tetravalent dengue vaccine in healthy children in Asia: a phase 3, randomised, observer-masked, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2014 July 10 384: 1358–1365. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61060-6
    1. Wilder-Smith A (2014/1) Dengue Vaccines: dawning at last. Lancet Infectious Dieseases. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 11 July 2014, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61142-9 (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Ooi EE, Vasudevan SG, Gubler DJ (2010) Update on dengue: epidemiology, virus evolution, antiviral drugs, and vaccine development. Curr Infect Dis Rep 12: 157–164 10.1007/s11908-010-0102-7
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Macary P (2014/2) Dengue: challenges for vaccine developers and policy makers. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014; 16: 404 Published online Apr 30, 2014. 10.1007/s11908-014-0404-2 (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Ekpereonne E, Lenhart A, Smith L, Horstick O (2010) A systematic review on effectiveness of peridomestic space spraying with insecticide on dengue transmission, TMIH May 2010, Volume 15 No 5 pp 619–631 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02489.x
    1. Boyce R, Lenhart A, Kroeger A, Velayudhan R, Horstick O (2013) Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) for the control of dengue vectors: A systematic review, TMIH May 2013, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 564–577 10.1111/tmi.12087
    1. Pilger D, De Maesschalck M, Horstick O, San Martin JL (2009) Dengue outbreak response: a systematic literature review, TropikaNet Vol 1 No 1 Jan/Mar2010 (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Badurdeen S, Valladares DB, Farrar J, Gozzer E, Kroeger A, et al. (2013) Sharing experiences: towards an evidence based model of dengue surveillance and outbreak response in Latin America and Asia. BMC Public Health 13: 607 10.1186/1471-2458-13-607
    1. Horstick O, Morrison AC (2014) Dengue Disease Surveillance: Improving Data for Dengue Control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(11): e3311 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003311
    1. McAllister JC, Godsey MS, Scott ML (2012) Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Port-au-Prince, Haiti. J Vector Ecol 37: 325–332 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00234.x
    1. Mulyatno KC, Yamanaka A, Ngadino, Konishi E (2012) Resistance of Aedes aegypti (L.) larvae to temephos in Surabaya, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 43: 29–33
    1. Alphey N, Alphey L, Bonsall MB (2011) A model framework to estimate impact and cost of genetics-based sterile insect methods for dengue vector control. PLoS One 6: e25384 10.1371/journal.pone.0025384
    1. Walker T, Johnson PH, Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frentiu FD, et al. (2011) The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature 476: 450–453 10.1038/nature10355
    1. WHO (2014/2) Global Health Atlas. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. GHN (2014) Global Health Network (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Peeling R (2010) Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue. Nat Rev Micro, 2010
    1. Horstick O, Farrar J, Lum L, Martinez E, San Martin JL (2012) Reviewing the development, evidence base and application of the revised dengue case classification, Pathogens and Global Health, Volume 106, Number 2, May 2012, pp 94–101(8) 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000017
    1. Uzman H, Safitri I, Lum L, Martinez E, Kroeger A et al. (2012) The effectiveness of intravenous rehydration to prevent death from severe dengue Dengue Bulletin 36, 2012, pp 149–165, (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Farrar JJ, Hien TT, Horstick O, Hung NT, Jaenisch T, et al. (2013) Dogma in classifying dengue disease. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89: 198–201 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0157
    1. Whitehorn J, Rodriguez Roche R, Guzman MG, Martinez E, Gomez WV, et al. (2012) Prophylactic platelets in dengue: survey responses highlight lack of an evidence base. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6: e1716 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001716
    1. WHO TDR (2009) Dengue: Antiviral Research and Development against Dengue (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Beatty ME, Beutels P, Meltzer MI, Shepard DS, Hombach J, et al. (2011) Health economics of dengue: a systematic literature review and expert panel's assessment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84: 473–488 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0521
    1. Barnighausen T, Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, O'Brien JC (2013) Valuing the broader benefits of dengue vaccination, with a preliminary application to Brazil. Semin Immunol 25: 104–113 10.1016/j.smim.2013.04.010
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ (2008) Geographic expansion of dengue: the impact of international travel. Med Clin North Am 92: 1377–1390 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.07.002
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Schwartz E (2005) Dengue in travelers. NEnglJMed 353: 924–932
    1. EC (2014/1) European Commission, Community Research and Information Service, Dengue. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. EC (2014/2) European Commission, Research and Innovation Participant Portal, Call identifier. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Wilder-Smith A, Renhorn KE, Tissera H, Abu Bakar S, Alphey L, et al. (2012) DengueTools: innovative tools and strategies for the surveillance and control of dengue. Global health action 5
    1. ICAV (2014) International Consortium on Antivirals. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Liese BH, Schubert L (2009) Official development assistance for health-how neglected are neglected tropical diseases? An analysis of health financing. Int Health, 2009. 1(2): p. 141–7 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.08.004
    1. WHO (2013) World Health Assembly (WHA) Resolution on Neglected Tropical Diseases: Comprehensive resolution on all 17 neglected tropical diseases. 2013, World Health Organization: Geneva:
    1. IFRC (2014) Disaster relief and emergency fund enables dengue outbreak response. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. G-FINDER (2014) (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. Moran M (2013) G-FINDER 2013 Report: Neglected Disease Research and Development: The Public Divide 2013, Policy Cures: Australia:
    1. Hotez PJ, Pecoul B (2010) "Manifesto" for advancing the control and elimination of neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2010. 4(5): p. e718 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000718
    1. Hotez PJ (2013) Strengthening mechanisms to prioritize, coordinate, finance, and execure R&D to meet health needs in developing countries. 2013, Institute of Medicine Discussion Paper
    1. Pedrique B (2013) The drug and vaccine landscape for neglected diseases (2000?11): a systematic assessment. The Lancet Global Health, 2013. 1(6): p. e371–e379 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70078-0
    1. Rigau-Pérez JG (1998) Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. The Lancet, 1998. 352 (9132): p. 971–977
    1. Murray CJL (2012) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 2012. 380 (9859): p. 2197–2223 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4
    1. BVGH (2014) Bioventures for Global Health. Global Health Primer. (Accessed 31 July 2014)
    1. WHO (2006) Report of the Scientific Working Group on Dengue, WHO, Geneva, 01–05 October 2006, (Accessed 31 July 2014)

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj