Characteristics of general practice care: what do senior citizens value? A qualitative study

P G J Berkelmans, Annette J Berendsen, Peter F M Verhaak, Klaas van der Meer, P G J Berkelmans, Annette J Berendsen, Peter F M Verhaak, Klaas van der Meer

Abstract

Background: In view of the increasing number of senior citizens in our society who are likely to consult their GP with age-related health problems, it is important to identify and understand the preferences of this group in relation to the non-medical attributes of GP care. The aim of this study is to improve our understanding about preferences of this group of patients in relation to non-medical attributes of primary health care. This may help to develop strategies to improve the quality of care that senior citizens receive from their GP.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews (N = 13) with senior citizens (65-91 years) in a judgement sample were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis was conducted according to qualitative research methodology and the frame work method.

Results: Continuity of care providers, i.e. GP and practice nurses, GPs' expertise, trust, free choice of GP and a kind open attitude were highly valued. Accessibility by phone did not meet the expectations of the interviewees. The interviewees had difficulties with the GP out-of-office hours services. Spontaneous home visits were appreciated by some, but rejected by others. They preferred to receive verbal information rather than collecting information from leaflets. Distance to the practice and continuity of caregiver seemed to conflict for respondents.

Conclusions: Preferences change in the process of ageing and growing health problems. GPs and their co-workers should be also aware of the changing needs of the elderly regarding non-medical attributes of GP care. Meeting their needs regarding non-medical attributes of primary health care is important to improve the quality of care.

References

    1. Van Lindert H, Droomers M, Westert GP. Second National Study of illness and interventions at GP posts. A matter of difference: Differences in self reported life style, health and use of care. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. 2004.
    1. Van Oers JAM, editor. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum. 2002. Health on Course? The 2002 Dutch Public Health Status and Forecasts Report.
    1. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Olesen F, Ribacke M, Spenser T, Scécsényi J. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of general Practice (EUROPEP) Fam Pract. 1999;16(4):4–11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.
    1. Sans-Corrales M, Pujol-Ribera E, Gené-Badia J, Pasarín-Rua MI, Iglesias-Pérez B, Casajuana-Bruner J. Family medicine attributes related to satisfaction, health and costs. Fam Pract 2006. pp. 308–16.
    1. Scott A, Stewart Watson M, Ross S. Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci & Med. 2003;56:803–14.
    1. Wernthoft E, Hallberg IR, Edberg A. Priorization and resource allocation in health care. The views of older people receiving continuous public care and service. Health Expect. 2007;10:117–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00426.x.
    1. Jung HP, Baerveldt C, Olesen F, Grol R, Wensing M. Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect. 2003;6:160–181. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00221.x.
    1. Aaen Geest T, Wetzels R, Raposo V, Lopes Ferreira P, Baker R, Wensing M, Olesen F. Elderly patients'and GP's views on different methods for patient involvement: an international qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2005;22(2):184–191. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh733.
    1. Aaen Geest T, Wetzels R, Wensing M, Cohen Castel O, Olesen F. Evaluation of an intervention designed to enhance involvement of older patients in their own care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(1):3–9. doi: 10.1080/13814780600766253.
    1. Rosén P, Anell A, Hjortsberg C. Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care. Health Policy. 2001;5(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(00)00122-6.
    1. Wensing M, Vedsted P, Kersnik J, Peersman W, Klingenberg A, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, Paulus D, Künzi B, Mendive J, Grol R. Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14:111–118.
    1. Thompson AGH, Suñol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995;7:127–141. doi: 10.1016/1353-4505(95)00008-J.
    1. Marshall NM. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13(6):522–525. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522.
    1. Kempen GIJM, Suurmeijer ThPBM. The development of a hierarchical polychotomous ADL-IADL scale for noninstitutionalized elders. Gerontologist. 1990;30(4):497–502.
    1. Malterud K. Qualitative research standards, challenges, and guideline. Lancet. 2001;358:483–488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
    1. Ritchie J, Spencer L. In: Analyzing Qualitative data. Bryman A, Burgess R, editor. London, Routledge; 1994. Qualitative data analysis in applied policy research; pp. 173–195. full_text.
    1. Peters V, Wester F. How qualitative software may support the qualitative analysis process. Qual Quant. 2007;41:635–59. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9016-8.
    1. Stoddart H, Evans M, Peters TJ, Salisbury C. The provision of 'same-day' care in general practice: an observational study. Fam Pract. 2003;20(1):41–47. doi: 10.1093/fampra/20.1.41.
    1. Bower P, Roland M, Campbell J, Mead N. Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ. 2003;326:258–262. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7383.258.
    1. Hjelmgren J, Anell A. Population preferences and choice of primary care models: A discrete choice experiment in Sweden. Health Policy. 2007;83(2-3):314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.006.
    1. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whally D, Bower P, Roland M. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(2):107–115. doi: 10.1370/afm.816.
    1. Worrall G, Knight J. Continuity of care for older patients in family practice: how important is it? Can Fam Physician. 2006;52:754–755.
    1. Campbell JL, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary healthcare. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:90–95. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90.
    1. Meuwissen LE, de Bakker DH. Consumer quality-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A180.
    1. Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Rotar Pavlic D, Raposo V, Baker R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: A qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025.
    1. Rotar-Pavlič D, Švab I, Wetzels R. How do older patients and their GPs evaluate shared decision-making in healthcare? BMC Geriatrics. 2008;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-9.
    1. Ridd M, Shaw A, Lewis G, Salisbury C. The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(561):e116–133. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420248.
    1. Tarrant C, Stokes T, Baker R. Factors associated with patient's trust in their general practitioner: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:798–800.
    1. Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract. 2003;20(6):623–627. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg601.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj