Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory

Carl R May, Frances Mair, Tracy Finch, Anne MacFarlane, Christopher Dowrick, Shaun Treweek, Tim Rapley, Luciana Ballini, Bie Nio Ong, Anne Rogers, Elizabeth Murray, Glyn Elwyn, France Légaré, Jane Gunn, Victor M Montori, Carl R May, Frances Mair, Tracy Finch, Anne MacFarlane, Christopher Dowrick, Shaun Treweek, Tim Rapley, Luciana Ballini, Bie Nio Ong, Anne Rogers, Elizabeth Murray, Glyn Elwyn, France Légaré, Jane Gunn, Victor M Montori

Abstract

Background: Theories are important tools in the social and natural sciences. The methods by which they are derived are rarely described and discussed. Normalization Process Theory explains how new technologies, ways of acting, and ways of working become routinely embedded in everyday practice, and has applications in the study of implementation processes. This paper describes the process by which it was built.

Methods: Between 1998 and 2008, we developed a theory. We derived a set of empirical generalizations from analysis of data collected in qualitative studies of healthcare work and organization. We developed an applied theoretical model through analysis of empirical generalizations. Finally, we built a formal theory through a process of extension and implication analysis of the applied theoretical model.

Results: Each phase of theory development showed that the constructs of the theory did not conflict with each other, had explanatory power, and possessed sufficient robustness for formal testing. As the theory developed, its scope expanded from a set of observed regularities in data with procedural explanations, to an applied theoretical model, to a formal middle-range theory.

Conclusion: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through procedures that were properly sceptical and critical, and which were opened to review at each stage of development. The theory has been shown to merit formal testing.

References

    1. Ashford AJ. Behavioural change in professional practice: supporting the development of effective implementation strategies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research; 2002.
    1. Wensing M, Bosch M, Foy R, Weijden T van der, Eccles M, Grol R. Factors in theories on behaviour change to guide implementation and quality improvement in healthcare. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen; 2005.
    1. Grol R, Wensing M, Hulscher M, Eccles M. Theories on implementation of change in healthcare. Nijmegan: WOK; 2004.
    1. Grol RP, Bosch M, Hulscher M, Eccles M, Wensing M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Quarterly. 2007;85:93–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.
    1. May C, Finch T. Implementation, embedding, and integration: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology. 2009.
    1. May C, Finch T, Mair F, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Eccles M, Gask L, MacFarlane A, Murray E, Rapley T, et al. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-148.
    1. May C. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-86.
    1. Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H. Medical innovation: a diffusion study. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; 1966.
    1. Rogers EM. The Diffusion of Innovations. 4. New York: Free Press; 1995.
    1. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall; 1980.
    1. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Geels FW. Feelings of discontent and the promise of middle range theoy for STS: examples from technology dynamics. Sci Tech Hum Values. 2007;32:627–651. doi: 10.1177/0162243907303597.
    1. May C, Mort M, Mair F, Ellis NT, Gask L. Evaluation of new technologies in health care systems: what's the context? Health Informat J. 2000;6:64–68.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. May C, Mort M, Williams T, Mair FS, Gask L. Health Technology Assessment in its local contexts: studies of tele-healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:697–710. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00419-7.
    1. May CR, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair FS, Wallace P. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Informat Ass. 2003;10:596–604. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1145.
    1. May C, Allison G, Chapple A, Chew-Graham C, Dixon C, Gask L, Graham R, Rogers A, Roland M. Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners' accounts. Sociol Health Ill. 2004;26:135–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00384.x.
    1. May C. Chronic illness and intractability: professional-patient interactions in primary care. Chronic Illn. 2005;1:15–20.
    1. May C, Rapley T, Moreira T, Finch T, Heaven B. Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1022–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.003.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
    1. Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
    1. Stinchcombe A. Constructing social theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World; 1968.
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence in reviews: a review of methods. J Hlth Serv Res Pol. 2005;10:45–53. doi: 10.1258/1355819052801804.
    1. May C. Mobilizing modern facts: Health Technology Assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2006;28:513–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00505.x.
    1. Goldthorpe JH. On Sociology: Critique and Program. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006.
    1. Wacker JG. A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments. J Operations Management. 2004;22:629–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.002.
    1. Mair FS, May C, Finch T, Murray E, Anderson G, Sullivan F, O'Donnell C, Wallace P, Epstein O. Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:S36–S37. doi: 10.1258/135763307781645112.
    1. Finch TL, Mort M, Mair FS, May CR. Tele-healthcare and future patients: Configuring 'the patient'. Hlth Soc Care Comm. 2007;16:86–95.
    1. May C. Innovation and Implementation in Health Technology: Normalizing Telemedicine. In: Gabe J, Calnan M, editor. The New Sociology of the National Health Service. London: Routledge;
    1. Elwyn G, Legare F, Edwards A, Weijden T van der, May C. Arduous implementation: does the normalisation process model explain why it is so difficult to embed decision support technologies in routine clinical practice. Implementation Science. 2008;3:57. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-57.
    1. Morriss R. Implementing clinical guidelines for bipolar disorder. Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice. 2008;81:437–458. doi: 10.1348/147608308X278105.
    1. Gask L, Rogers A, Campbell S, Sheaff R. Beyond the limits of clinical governance: the case of mental health in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-63.
    1. King G, Richards H, Godden D. Adoption of telemedicine in Scottish remote and rural general practices: a qualitative study. J Teleme Telecare. 2007;13:382–386. doi: 10.1258/135763307783064430.
    1. Mair FS, Hiscock J, Beaton SC. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Ill. 2008;4:110–117. doi: 10.1177/1742395308092482.
    1. Finch TL, Mair FS, May CR. Teledermatology in the UK: lessons in service innovation. Brit J Dermatol. 2007;156:521–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07608.x.
    1. Turner JH. Analytical Theorizing. In: Giddens A, Turner J, editor. Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1987. pp. 156–194.
    1. Finch T. Teledermatology for chronic disease management: coherence and normalization. Chronic Ill. 2008;4:127–134. doi: 10.1177/1742395308092483.
    1. Hechter M, Horne C. Theory is explanation. In: Hechter M, Horne C, editor. Theories of social order. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press; 2003.
    1. Lieberson S, Lynn FB. Barking up the wrong branch: Scientific alternatives to the current model of sociological science. Annual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:1–19. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141122.
    1. May C. Mundane Medicine, Therapeutic Relationships, and the Clinical Encounter.'. In: Pescosolido B, Martin JA, Rogers A, editor. Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century. New York: Springer;
    1. Hedstrom P. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
    1. Mair F, May C, Murray E, Finch T, Anderson G, O'Donnell C, Wallace P, Sullivan F. Understanding the Implementation and Integration of E-Health Services. London: National Co-ordinating Centre for the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Programme (NCCSDO); 2009.
    1. Gunn J, Kokanovic R, Palmer V, Potiriadis M, Johnson C, Johnston Ata-Ata K, Dowrick C, Griffiths F, Hegarty K, Herrman H, et al. Re-organising the care of depression and other related disorders in the Australian Primary Health Care Setting. Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute; 2009.
    1. May C, Mair FS, Dowrick C, Finch T. Process evaluation of complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-42.
    1. Wilkes S. Evaluation of open access hysterosalpingography in the initial management of infertility in primary care. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Sunderland; 2007.
    1. Merton R. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1968.
    1. Boudon R. What middle-range theories are. Contemp Sociol. 1991;20:519–522. doi: 10.2307/2071781.
    1. Merton RK. On Theoretical Sociology: five essays, old and new. New York: The Free Press; 1967.
    1. Hedstrom P, Swedberg R. Introduction. In: Hedstrom P, Swedberg R, editor. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 1–26.
    1. Glaser BG. The future of grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 1999;9:836–845. doi: 10.1177/104973299129122199.
    1. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 1998.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE; 2006.
    1. Land K. Formal theory. Sociol Methodol. 1971;3:175–220. doi: 10.2307/270822.
    1. Jasso G. Principles of theoretical analysis. Sociol Theory. 1988;6:1–20. doi: 10.2307/201910.
    1. Rogers EM. A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. J Health Communicat. 2004;9:13–19. doi: 10.1080/10810730490271449.
    1. Collins HM. Tacit knowledge in scientific networks. In: Barnes B, Edge D, editor. Science in context: readings in the sociology of science. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1982. pp. 44–64.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj