Are GPs under-investigating older patients presenting with symptoms of ovarian cancer? Observational study using General Practice Research Database

A R Tate, A Nicholson, J A Cassell, A R Tate, A Nicholson, J A Cassell

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest that older patients in the United Kingdom are not benefiting as much from improvements in cancer treatments as their younger counterparts. We investigate whether this might be partly due to differential referral rates using ovarian cancer as an example.

Methods: From the General Practice Research Database (GPRD), we identified all women aged 40-80 years on 1 June 2002 with a Read code for ovarian cancer between 1 June 2002 and 31 May 2007. Using these records, we compared the GPRD incidence of ovarian cancer with rates compiled from the UK cancer registries and investigated the relationship between age and coded investigations for suspected ovarian cancer.

Results: The GPRD rates peaked earlier, at 70-74, and were lower than registry rates for nearly all ages particularly for patients over 59. The proportion investigated or referred by the GP decreased significantly with age and delays between first coded symptom and investigation showed a U-shaped distribution by age.

Conclusions: GPs appear to be less likely to recognise and to refer patients presenting with ovarian cancer as they get older. If our findings extend to other cancers, lack of or delays in referral to secondary care may partly explain poor UK cancer mortality rates of older people.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The distribution of time in weeks before a patient first reporting any ovarian cancer symptom and being referred for a relevant investigation, by age.

References

    1. Adams J, Audisio R, White M, Forman D (2004) Age-related variations in progression of cancer at diagnosis and completeness of cancer registry data. Surg Oncol 13(4): 175–179
    1. Allgar VL, Neal RD (2005) General practitioners’ management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients – cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 14(5): 409–416
    1. Berrino F, Angelis RD, Sant M, Rosso S, Lasota MB, Coebergh JW, Santaquilani M (2007) Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–99: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol 8(9): 773–783
    1. Bouchardy C, Rapiti E, Blagojevic S, Vlastos A-T, Vlastos G (2007) Older female cancer patients: importance, causes, and consequences of undertreatment. J Clin Oncol 25(14): 1858–1869
    1. CRUK (2009) (accessed on 30 September 2009) Cancer Research UK: Cancer Stats.
    1. De Rijke J, Schouten L, Volovics A, Van der Putten H (1998) Age-specific differences in treatment and survival of ovarian cancer patients in the province of Limburg, the Netherlands, 1986–92. Int J Gynecol Cancer 8(2): 150–157
    1. Falandry C, You B, Morel-Soldner I, Bonnefoy M, Pujade-Lauraine E, Freyer G (2008) Ovarian cancer in the elderly. Oncologie 10(1): 3–7. 8th Biennale Monegasque Cancer Meeting, Monte Carlo, Monaco, 2008
    1. GPRD (2009) GPRD. Excellence in public health research.
    1. Hamilton W (2009) The caper studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br J Cancer 101(S2): S80–S86
    1. Hansell AL, Lam KA, Richardson S, Visick G, Soriano JB (2004) Medical event profiling of COPD patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13(8): 547–555
    1. Haynes K, Forde KA, Schinnar R, Wong P, Strom BL, Lewis JD (2009) Cancer incidence in the health improvement network. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18(8): 730–736
    1. Jones R, Charlton J, Latinovic R, Gulliford MC (2009) Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study. Br Med J 339: 491–493
    1. Kirwan JMJ, Tincello DG, Herod JJO, Frost O, Kingston RE (2002) Effect of delays in primary care referral on survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer: retrospective audit. Br Med J 324(7330): 148–151
    1. Majeed A, Car J, Sheikh A (2008) Accuracy and completeness of electronic patient records in primary care. Fam Pract 25(4): 213–214
    1. Moran A, Moeller H (2009) Poor progress in cancer control in elderly in UK. In: Proceedings of the 2009 NCIN Conference. National cancer Intelligence Network. pp 1–2.
    1. Neal R, Allgar V (2005) Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the ‘National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer’. Br J Cancer 92(11): 1971–1975
    1. Pascoe SW, Neal RD, Heywood PL, Allgar VL, Miles JN, Stefoski-Mikeljevic J (2008) Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data. Fam Pract 25(4): 215–220
    1. Peake M, Thompson S, Lowe D, Pearson M (2003) Ageism in the management of lung cancer. Age Ageing 32(2): 171–177
    1. Quaglia A, Tavilla A, Shack L, Brenner H, Janssen-Heijnen M, Allemani C, Colonna M, Grande E, Grosclaude P, Vercelli M, Eurocare Working Group (2009) The cancer survival gap between elderly and middle-aged patients in Europe is widening. Eur J Cancer 45(6, Sp. Iss. SI): 1006–1016
    1. Robertson R, Campbell N, Smith S, Donnan P, Sullivan F, Duffy R, Ritchie L, Millar D, Cassidy J, Munro A (2004) Factors influencing time from presentation to treatment of colorectal and breast cancer in urban and rural areas. Br J Cancer 90(8): 1479–1485
    1. Tate AR, Martin AGR, Murray-Thomas T, Anderson SR, Cassell JA (2009) Determining the date of diagnosis – is it a simple matter? The impact of different approaches to dating diagnosis on estimates of delayed care for ovarian cancer in UK primary care. BMC Med Res Methodol 9
    1. Turner N, Haward R, Mulley G, Selby P (1999) Cancer in old age – is it inadequately investigated and treated? Br Med J 319(7205): 309–312

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj