Randomised feasibility trial and embedded qualitative process evaluation of a new intervention to facilitate the involvement of older patients with multimorbidity in decision-making about their healthcare during general practice consultations: the VOLITION study protocol

Joanne Butterworth, Suzanne Richards, Fiona Warren, Emma Pitchforth, John Campbell, Joanne Butterworth, Suzanne Richards, Fiona Warren, Emma Pitchforth, John Campbell

Abstract

Background: The number of older people with multiple health problems is increasing worldwide. This creates a strain on clinicians and the health service when delivering clinical care to this patient group, who themselves carry a large treatment burden. Despite shared decision-making being acknowledged by healthcare organisations as a priority feature of clinical care, older patients with multimorbidity are less often involved in decision-making when compared with younger patients, with some evidence suggesting associated health inequalities. Interventions aimed at facilitating shared decision-making between doctors and patients are outdated in their assessments of today's older patient population who need support in prioritising complex care needs in order to maximise quality of life and day-to-day function.

Aims: To undertake feasibility testing of an intervention ('VOLITION') aimed at facilitating the involvement of older patients with more than one long-term health problem in shared decision-making about their healthcare during GP consultations.To inform the design of a fully powered trial to assess intervention effectiveness.

Methods: This study is a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with qualitative process evaluation interviews. Participants are patients, aged 65 years and above with more than one long-term health problem (multimorbidity), and the GPs that they consult with. This study aims to recruit 6 GP practices, 18 GPs and 180 patients. The intervention comprises two components: (i) a half-day training workshop for GPs in shared decision-making; and (ii) a leaflet for patients that facilitate their engagement with shared decision-making. Intervention implementation will take 2 weeks (to complete delivery of both patient and GP components), and follow-up duration will be 12 weeks (from index consultation and commencement of data collection to final case note review and process evaluation interview). The trial will run from 01/01/20 to 31/01/21; 1 year 31 days.

Discussion: Shared decision-making for older people with multimorbidity in general practice is under-researched. Emerging clinical guidelines advise a patient-centred approach, to reduce treatment burden and focus on quality of life alongside disease control. The systematic development, testing and evaluation of an intervention is warranted and timely. This study will test the feasibility of implementing a new intervention in UK general practice for future evaluation as a part of routine care.

Trial registration: CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV registration number NCT03786315, registered 24/12/18.

Keywords: Elderly; Multimorbidity; Older people; Patient involvement; Primary care; Shared decision-making.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© The Author(s) 2020.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Testing VOLITION: schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The VOLITION intervention

References

    1. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of mulitmorbidity and implications for healthcare, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2.
    1. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande S, Ozanne E, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3085.
    1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernandez ME. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. London: Willey Press; 2011.
    1. Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Pavlic DR, Raposo V, Baker R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025.
    1. Berkelmans PGJ, Berendsen AJ, Verhaak PFM, van der Meer K. Characteristics of general practice care: what do senior citizens value? A qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10(80) Available: , [01 Nov 2015].
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Bowling A, Rowe G, McKee M. Patients' experiences of their healthcare in relation to their expectations and satisfaction: a population survey. J R Soc Med. 2013;106(4):143–149. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120147.
    1. Butterworth JE, Hays R, Mcdonagh STJ, Richards SH, Bower P, Campbell J. Interventions for involving older patients with multi-morbidity in decision-making during primary care consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10 10.1002/14651858.CD013124.pub2.
    1. Butterworth JE, Campbell JL. Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(628):e709–e718. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682297.
    1. Campbell J, Smith P, Nissen S, Bower P, Elliott M, Roland M. The GP patient survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK—development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10(57) Available: [01 Nov 2015].
    1. Cassell A, Edwards D, Harshfield A, Rhodes K, Brimicombe J, Payne R. et al., ‘The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study’. Br J Gen Pract. 2018;86:e245–e251. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695465.
    1. Coleman T. Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Pract. 2000;17(5):422–427. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.5.422.
    1. Croker JE, Swancutt DR, Roberts MJ, Abel GA, Roland M, Campbell JL. Factors affecting patients' trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP Patient Survey. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002762. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002762.
    1. Department of Health . Liberating the NHS: no decision about me, without me. 2013.
    1. Department of Health . Long term conditions compendium of information: Third Edition. 2012.
    1. Department of Health . Atlas of variation. 2011.
    1. Drennan V, Walters K, Lenihan P, Cohen S, Myerson S, Iliffe S. Priorities in identifying unmet need in older people attending general practice: a nominal gorup technique study. Fam Pract. 2007;24(5):454–460. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm034.
    1. Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(1):102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009.
    1. Elwyn G, Tsulukidze M, Edwards A, Légaré F, Newcombe R. Using a ‘talk’ model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION5 Item. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(2):265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.08.005.
    1. Flocke SA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Relationships between physician practice style, patient satisfaction, and attributes of primary care. Fam Pract. 2013;51(10):835–840.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.
    1. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2. California USA: Sage; 2009.
    1. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: Evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(3):319–341. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002.
    1. Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner-Banzhoff N. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD006732.
    1. Loh A, Leonhart R, Wills CE, Simon D, Härter M. The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.007.
    1. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, Meinow B, Fratiglioni L. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003.
    1. McAllister M, Dunn G, Payne K, Davies L, Todd C. Patient empowerment: the need to consider it as a measurable patient-reported outcome for chronic conditions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:157. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-157.
    1. McBride D, Hardoon S, Walters K, Gilmour S, Raine R. Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study. BMJ Open. 2010;341(c6267) Available: 10.1136/bmj.c6267 [03 Nov 2015].
    1. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3):276–282. doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031.
    1. Melzer D, Tavakoly B, Winder RE, Masoli JAH, Henley WE, Ble A, Richards SH. More medicine for the oldest old: observational study in general practice records 2003 to 2011. Age Ageing. 2014. 10.1093/ageing/afu113 [02 Dec 2015].
    1. Moore, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J. 2015;35(h1258).
    1. Mujica-Mota RE, Roberts M, Abel G, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G, Roland M, Campbell J. Common patterns of morbidity and multimorbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):909–918. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0820-7.
    1. Muth C, van den Akker M, Blom JW, Mallen CD, Rochon J, Schellevis FG, et al. The Ariadne principles: how to handle multimorbidity in primary care consultations. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0223-1.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Multimorbidity: clinical assessment and management: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2016. Available: [14 Sept 2020].
    1. NHS England . Universal personalised care: implementing the Comprehensive Model [online] 2019.
    1. NHS Information Centre . Trends in consultation rates in general practice 1995 to 2008: analysis of the Q Research® database [online] 2009.
    1. Ommen O, Thuem S, Pfaff H, Janssen C. The relationship between social support, shared decision-making and patient's trust in doctors: a cross-sectional survey of 2,197 inpatients using the Cologne Patient Questionnaire. Int J Public Health. 2011;56(3):319–327. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0212-x.
    1. Peters RM. Matching physician practice style to patient information issues and decision-making preferences. An approach to patient autonomy and medical paternalism issues in clinical practice. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(9):760–763. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.9.760.
    1. Quiñones AR, Botoseneanu A, Markwardt S, Nagel CL, Newsom JT, Dorr DA, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in multimorbidity development and chronic disease accumulation for middle-aged adults. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218462.
    1. Richards DA, Hallberg IR. Complex interventions in health. An overview of research methods. 1st ed. Abingdon UK: Routledge; 2015.
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners . The RCGP curriculum. The curriculum topic guides. 2019.
    1. Royal College of General Practitioners . The 2022 GP compendium of evidence. 2013.
    1. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12–e21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X548929.
    1. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
    1. Singer L, Green M, Rowe F, Ben-Shlomo Y, Morrissey K. Social determinants of multimorbidity and multiple functional limitations among the ageing population of England, 2002–2015. SSM Popul Health. 2019;8:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100413.
    1. Tate AR, Nicholson A, Cassell JA. Are GPs under-investigating older patients presenting with symptoms of ovarian cancer? Observational study using General Practice Research Database. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(6):947–951. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605593.
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1) Available: [03 Nov 2015].
    1. Tinetti ME, Fried TR, Boyd CM. Designing health care for the most common chronic condition--multimorbidity. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2493–2494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5265.
    1. van den Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen SM, de Haes HC, Visser AP, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM. Has patients' involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Health Expect. 2006;9(4):333–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00413.x.
    1. Wetzels R, Harmsen M, Van Weel C, Grol R, Wensing M. Interventions for improving older patients’ involvement in primary care episodes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;24(1):CD004273.
    1. World Health Organization . A declaration on the promotion of patients' rights in Europe. 1994.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj