Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study

Jane Henderson, Ethel E Burns, Anna L Regalia, Giovanna Casarico, Mary G Boulton, Lesley A Smith, Jane Henderson, Ethel E Burns, Anna L Regalia, Giovanna Casarico, Mary G Boulton, Lesley A Smith

Abstract

Background: For women at low risk of childbirth complications, water immersion during labour is a care option in many high income countries. Our aims were (a) to describe maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes for all women who used a birthing pool during labour who either had a waterbirth or left the pool and had a landbirth, and for the subgroup of women who had a waterbirth in 19 obstetric units, and (b) to compare maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes for women who used a birthing pool with a control group of women who did not use a birthing pool for whom we prospectively collected data in a single centre.

Methods: Prospective observational study in 19 Italian obstetric units 2002-2005. Participants were: (a) 2,505 women in labour using a birthing pool in 19 obstetric units; and (b) 114 women in labour using a birthing pool and 459 women who did not use a birthing pool in one obstetric unit. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the sample as a whole and, separately, for those women who gave birth in water. Categorical data were compared using Chi square statistics and continuous data by T-tests.

Results: Overall, 95.6% of women using a birthing pool had a spontaneous vertex delivery, 63.9% of which occurred in water. Half of nulliparas and three quarters of multiparas delivered in water. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. There were two cases of umbilical cord snap with waterbirth. Compared with controls, significantly more women who used a birthing pool adopted an upright birth position, had hands off delivery technique, and a physiological third stage. Significantly fewer nulliparas had an episiotomy, and more had a second degree perineal tear, with no evidence of a difference for extensive perineal tears.

Conclusions: Birthing pool use was associated with spontaneous vaginal birth. The increase in second degree tears was balanced by fewer episiotomies. Undue umbilical cord traction should be avoided during waterbirth.

References

    1. Odent M. Birth under water. Lancet. 1983;2(8365–66):1476–1477.
    1. New Zealand College of Midwives. Consensus Statement: The use of Water in Labour and Birth. 2002. Date accessed 17th January 2014. [ ]
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives. Immersion in Water During Labour and Birth, Joint Statement No.1. vol. 10. London; 2006. Date accessed 10th January 2013. [ ]
    1. South Australia Department of Health. Policy for First Stage Labour and Birth in Water in South Australia/Government of South Australia, Department of Health. 2010. Date accessed 10th January 2013. [ ]
    1. CeDAP. Nuovo Rapporto CeDAP, Analisi dell’evento Nascita in Italia (CeDAP new Report, Analysis of the the Birth in Italy) 2012. Date accessed 10th January 2013. [ ]
    1. OECD. “Caesarean sections”, in Health at a Glance 2011. OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing; 2011. Date accessed 10th January 2013. [ ]
    1. Emons J, Luieten M. Midwifery in Europe: An Inventory in Fifteen EU-Member States. The European Midwives Liaison Committee; 2001. Date accessed 10th January 2013. [ ]
    1. Ohlsson G, Buchhave P, Leandersson U, Nordstrom L, Rydhstrom H, Sjolin I. Warm tub bathing during labor: maternal and neonatal effects. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(4):311–314. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080004311.x.
    1. Cluett E, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2(22/10/10):CD000111. DOI: 101002/14651858CD000111pub3.
    1. Benfield RD, Hortobagyi T, Tanner CJ, Swanson M, Heitkemper MM, Newton ER. The effects of hydrotherapy on anxiety, pain, neuroendocrine responses, and contraction dynamics during labor. Biol Res Nurs. 2010;12(1):28–36. doi: 10.1177/1099800410361535.
    1. Geissbuhler V, Eberhard J. Waterbirths: a comparative study. A prospective study on more than 2,000 waterbirths. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2000;15(5):291–300. doi: 10.1159/000021024.
    1. Hall SM, Holloway IM. Staying in control: women’s experiences of labour in water. Midwifery. 1998;14(1):30–36. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90112-7.
    1. Theoni A, Moroder L. Waterbirth: a safe and natural delivery method. Experience after 1355 waterbirths in Italy. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2004;70:44–48.
    1. Burns E, Boulton M, Cluett E, Cornelius V, Smith L. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women Who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study. Birth. 2012;39(3):1–11.
    1. Cro S, Preston J. Cord snapping at waterbirth delivery. Br J Midwifery. 2002;10(8):494–497.
    1. Gilbert RE, Tookey PA. Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey. Br Med J. 1999;319(7208):483–487. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7208.483.
    1. Cortes E, Basra R, Kelleher CJ. Waterbirth and pelvic floor injury: a retrospective study and postal survey using ICIQ modular long form questionnaires. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;155(1):27–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.012.
    1. Kassim Z, Sellars M, Greenough A. Underwater birth and neonatal respiratory distress. Br Med J. 2005;330(7499):1071–1072. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7499.1071.
    1. Mammas IN, Thiagarajan P. Water aspiration syndrome at birth – report of two cases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(4):365–367. doi: 10.1080/14767050802556067.
    1. Nguyen S, Kuschel C, Teele R, Spooner C. Water birth–a near-drowning experience. Pediatrics. 2002;110(2 Pt 1):411–413.
    1. Begley C, Gyte G, Murphy D, Devane D, McDonald S, McGuire W. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Systematc Reviews. 2010;11(05/02/):CD007412. DOI: 101002/14651858CD007412pub3.
    1. Fahy K, Hastie C, Bisits A, Marsh C, Smith L. A S. Holistic physiological care compared with active management of the third stage of labour for woman at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort study. Women Birth. 2010;23:145–152.
    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) International Classification of Diseases. Accessed 15th August, 2012, from . 2010.
    1. Geissbuehler V, Stein S, Eberhard J. Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):308–314.
    1. Otigbah CM, Dhanjal MK, Harmsworth G, Chard T. A retrospective comparison of water births and conventional vaginal deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;91(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00238-9.
    1. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, Elbourne D. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(12):1262–1272. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10004.x.
    1. Thoeni A, Zech N, Moroder L, Ploner F. Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17(5):357–361. doi: 10.1080/14767050500140388.
    1. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2009;5:CD002006. DOI: 101002/14651858CD002006pub3.
    1. Davis D, Baddock S, Pairman S, Hunter M, Benn C, Anderson J, Dixon L, Hebison P. Risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage in low-risk childbearing women in New Zealand: exploring the effect of place of birth and comparing third stage management of labour. Birth. 2012;39(2):1–8.
    1. Begley C. A comparison of ‘active’ and ‘physiological’ management of the third stage of labour. Midwifery. 1990;6(1):3–17. doi: 10.1016/S0266-6138(05)80091-9.
    1. Morano S, Cerutti F, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Benussi M, Costantini S, Ragni N. Outcomes of the first midwife-led birth centre in Italy: 5 years’ experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(4):333–337. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0358-9.
    1. Monari F, Di Mario S, Facchinetti F, Basevi V. Obstetricians’ and midwives’ attitudes toward cesarean section. Birth. 2008;35(2):129–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00226.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj