Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions

Gitte Keidser, Elizabeth Convery, Gitte Keidser, Elizabeth Convery

Abstract

A self-contained, self-fitting hearing aid (SFHA) is a device that enables the user to perform both threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid setting and fine-tuning, without the need for audiological support or access to other equipment. The SFHA has been proposed as a potential solution to address unmet hearing health care in developing countries and remote locations in the developed world and is considered a means to lower cost and increase uptake of hearing aids in developed countries. This article reviews the status of the SFHA and the evidence for its feasibility and challenges and predicts where it is heading. Devices that can be considered partly or fully self-fitting without audiological support were identified in the direct-to-consumer market. None of these devices are considered self-contained as they require access to other hardware such as a proprietary interface, computer, smartphone, or tablet for manipulation. While there is evidence that self-administered fitting processes can provide valid and reliable results, their success relies on user-friendly device designs and interfaces and easy-to-interpret instructions. Until these issues have been sufficiently addressed, optional assistance with the self-fitting process and on-going use of SFHAs is recommended. Affordability and a sustainable delivery system remain additional challenges for the SFHA in developing countries. Future predictions include a growth in self-fitting products, with most future SFHAs consisting of earpieces that connect wirelessly with a smartphone and providers offering assistance through a telehealth infrastructure, and the integration of SFHAs into the traditional hearing health-care model.

Keywords: amplification; hearing aid; hearing apps; hearing health care; self-fitting; teleaudiology.

© The Author(s) 2016.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
An overview of the processes associated with fitting a hearing aid, and how each process is achieved in devices classified as “user-programmable” and “self-fitting.” The processes can be managed either from an Software application (“assisted” devices) or via on-board buttons (“self-contained” devices). Currently, all commercial products are assisted devices.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overview of the steps managed by the user when self-fitting a hearing aid, and the hearing aid and person-directed factors that should increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.

References

    1. Amlani A. M., Taylor B., Levy C., Robbins R. (2013) Utility of smartphone-based hearing aid applications as a substitute to traditional hearing aids. The Hearing Review 20: 16–23.
    1. Anantharaman K. (2015) Let’s turn your smart phone to a smart physician. Journal of Novel Physiotherapy and Physical Rehabilitation 2(1): 8–9.
    1. Bertoli S., Staehelin K., Zemp E., Schindler C., Bodmer D., Probst R. (2009) Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. International Journal of Audiology 48(4): 183–195.
    1. Blamey, P. (2012). An alternative to the audiogram for hearing aid fitting. Poster presented at the International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Lake Tahoe.
    1. Byrne D., Cotton S. (1988) Evaluation of the national acoustic laboratories’ new hearing aid selection procedure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31(2): 178–186.
    1. Caccamo S., Voloshchenko A., Dankyi N. Y. (2014) The importance of creating a social business to produce low-cost hearing aids. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 9(5): 368–373.
    1. Caposecco A., Hickson L., Meyer C. (2011) Assembly and insertion of a self-fitting hearing aid: Design of effective instruction materials. Trends in Amplification 14(4): 184–196.
    1. Caposecco A., Hickson L., Meyer C., Khan A. (2016) Evaluation of a modified user guide for hearing aid management. Ear and Hearing 37(1): 27–37.
    1. Carkeet D., Pither D., Anderson M. (2014) Service, training and outreach – The EARS Inc. Model for a self sustainable hearing program in action. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 9(5): 383–390.
    1. Clark J. L., Swanepoel de W. (2014) Technology for hearing loss – As we know it, and as we dream it. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 9(5): 408–413.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Caposecco A., Swanepoel de W., Wong L. L., Shen E. (2013) Hearing-aid assembly management among adults from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds: Toward the feasibility of self-fitting hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 52(6): 385–393.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Dillon H., Hartley L. (2011a) A self-fitting hearing aid: Need and concept. Trends in Amplification 15(4): 157–166.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Hartley L. (2011b) Perception of a self-fitting hearing aid among urban-dwelling hearing-impaired adults in a developed country. Trends in Amplification 15(4): 175–183.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Hartley L., Caposecco A., Hickson L., Meyer C. (2011c) Management of hearing aid assembly by urban-dwelling hearing-impaired adults in a developed country: Implications for a self-fitting hearing aid. Trends in Amplification 15(4): 196–208.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Seeto M., Freeston K., Zhou D., Dillon H. (2014) Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: Reliability and validity of an automatic test battery. Ear and Hearing 35(1): e1–e8. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e058f.
    1. Convery, E., Keidser, G., Seeto, M., & McLelland, M. (in review). Evaluation of the self-fitting process with a commercially available hearing aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
    1. Convery E., Keidser G., Seeto M., Yeend I., Freeston K. (2015) Factors affecting reliability and validity of self-directed automatic in situ audiometry: Implications for self-fitting hearing AIDS. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26(1): 5–18.
    1. Cruickshanks K. J., Wiley T. L., Tweed T. S., Klein B. E., Klein R., Mares-Perlman J. A., Nondahl D. M. (1998) Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in beaver dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 148(9): 879–886.
    1. Desjardins J. L., Doherty K. A. (2009) Do experienced hearing aid users know how to use their hearing AIDS correctly? American Journal of Audiology 18(1): 69–76.
    1. Dillon H., Keidser G. (2003) Arguments for and against using probe-mic measurments. The Hearing Journal 56(10): 28–30.
    1. Dillon H., Zakis J., McDermott H. J., Keidser G., Dreschler W. A., Convery E. (2006) The trainable hearing aid: What will it do for clients and clinicians? The Hearing Journal 59(4): 30–36.
    1. Doak C., Doak L., Root J. (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy levels, Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott.
    1. Doherty K. A., Desjardins J. L. (2012) The practical hearing aids skills test-revised. American Journal of Audiology 21(1): 100–105.
    1. Dreschler W. A., Keidser G., Convery E., Dillon H. (2008) Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: The effect of different control configurations. Ear and Hearing 29(2): 214–227.
    1. Erber N. P. (2003) Use of hearing aids by older people: Influence of non-auditory factors (vision, manual dexterity). International Journal of Audiology 42(Suppl 2): 2S21–25.
    1. Galster J. (2012) Apps for audiology. Audiology Practices 4(3): 16–19. Retrieved from .
    1. Grenness C., Hickson L., Laplante-Levesque A., Davidson B. (2014a) Patient-centred audiological rehabilitation: Perspectives of older adults who own hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 53(Suppl 1): S68–S75.
    1. Grenness C., Hickson L., Laplante-Levesque A., Davidson B. (2014b) Patient-centred care: A review for rehabilitative audiologists. International Journal of Audiology 53(Suppl 1): S60–S67.
    1. Hartley D., Rochtchina E., Newall P., Golding M., Mitchell P. (2010) Use of hearing AIDS and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21(10): 642–653.
    1. Keidser G. (2009) Many factors are involved in optimizing environmentally adaptive hearing aids. The Hearing Journal 62(1): 26–32.
    1. Keidser G., Alamudi K. (2013) Real-life efficacy and reliability of training a hearing aid. Ear and Hearing 34(5): 619–629.
    1. Keidser G., Dillon H., Convery E. (2008) The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124(3): 1668–1681.
    1. Keidser G., Dillon H., Zhou D., Carter L. (2011) Threshold measurements by self-fitting hearing aids: Feasibility and challenges. Trends in Amplification 15(4): 167–174.
    1. Keidser G., Grant F. (2001) Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device. Ear and Hearing 22(6): 501–515.
    1. Kiessling J., Leifholz M., Unkel S., Pons-Kuhnemann J., Jespersen C. T., Pedersen J. N. (2015) A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26(1): 68–79.
    1. Kralik D., Koch T., Price K., Howard N. (2004) Chronic illness self-management: Taking action to create order. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13(2): 259–267.
    1. Kricos P. B. (2006) Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities. Trends in Amplification 10(1): 1–28.
    1. Kutner M., Greenberg E. Y. J., Paulsen C. (2006) The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy (NCES 2006483), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
    1. Lawn S., Battersby M. W., Pols R. G., Lawrence J., Parry T., Urukalo M. (2007) The mental health expert patient: Findings from a pilot study of a generic chronic condition self-management programme for people with mental illness. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry 53(1): 63–74.
    1. Mahomed, F., Swanepoel, D. W., Eikelboom, R. H., & Soer, M. (2013). Validity of automated threshold audiometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear and Hearing. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182944bdf.
    1. Margolis R. H., Glasberg B. R., Creeke S., Moore B. C. J. (2010) AMTAS®: Automated method for testing audiotory sensitivity: Validation studies. International Journal of Aduiology 49(3): 185–194.
    1. Margolis R. H., Saly G. L., Le C., Laurence J. (2007) Qualind: A method for assessing the accuracy of automated test. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18(1): 78–89.
    1. Mayer G., Villaire M. (2007) Health literacy in primary care: A clinician’s guide, New York, NY: Springer.
    1. Meng H., Friedberg F., Castora-Binkley M. (2014) Cost-effectiveness of chronic fatigue self-management versus usual care: A pilot randomized controlled trial. BioMed Central Family Practice 15: 184.
    1. Mueller H. G., Hornsby B. W., Weber J. E. (2008) Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 19(10): 758–773.
    1. O’Brien A., Keidser G., Yeend I., Hartley L., Dillon H. (2010) Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips. International Journal of Audiology 49(12): 868–876.
    1. Osborne H. (2005) Health literacry from A to Z, Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    1. Pew Research Center. (2015). The smartphone difference. Retrieved from .
    1. Pothier D. D., Bredenkamp C. (2006) Hearing aid insertion: Correlation between patients’ confidence and ability. The Journal of Laryngology and Otology 120(5): 378–380.
    1. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report. (2015). Retrieved from .
    1. Richardson G., Epstein D., Chew-Graham C., Dowrick C., Bentall R. P., Morriss R. K. FINE Trial Writing group on behalf of the FINE Trial group (2013) Cost-effectiveness of supported self-management for CFS/ME patients in primary care. BioMed Central Family Practice 14: 12.
    1. Saunders G. H., Lewis M. S., Forsline A. (2009) Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20(5): 320–334.
    1. Seelman K. D., Werner R. (2014) Technology transfer of hearing aids to low and middle income countries: Policy and market factors. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 9(5): 399–407.
    1. Shaw G. (2015) Unbundling hearing health care pricing: Up-front work pays off. The Hearing Journal 68: 28–32.
    1. Singh G., Pichora-Fuller M. K., Hayes D., von Schroeder H. P., Carnahan H. (2013) The aging hand and the ergonomics of hearing aid controls. Ear and Hearing 34(1): e1–e13. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f9bba.
    1. Sjoblad, S. (2015). A model of evidence-based practice with itemized billing. Institute of Medicine Committee on Accessble and Affordable Hearing Health Care for Adults, University of North Carolina: Chapel Hill.
    1. Storey K. K., Munoz K., Nelson L., Larsen J., White K. (2014) Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment. International Journal of Audiology 53(10): 730–736.
    1. Swanepoel D., Maclennan-Smith F., Hall J. W. (2013) Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: Mobile testing without a sound-treated environment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24(10): 992–1000.
    1. UK Office for National Statistics. (2015, August 6). Internet access – Households and individuals 2015. Statistical Bulletin. Retrieved from .
    1. Upfold L. J., May A. E., Battaglia J. A. (1990) Hearing aid manipulation skills in an elderly population: A comparison of ITE, BTE, and ITC aids. British Journal of Audiology 24(5): 311–318.
    1. Usher, J., & Keady, J. P. (2015). Acoustic sealing analysis system. U.S. Patent no 9,113,267.
    1. Zakis J. A., Dillon H., McDermott H. J. (2007) The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters. Ear and Hearing 28(6): 812–830.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj