Reduced acquisition and overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Candida species in patients treated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection

Michelle M Nerandzic, Kathleen Mullane, Mark A Miller, Farah Babakhani, Curtis J Donskey, Michelle M Nerandzic, Kathleen Mullane, Mark A Miller, Farah Babakhani, Curtis J Donskey

Abstract

Fidaxomicin causes less disruption of anaerobic microbiota during treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) than vancomycin and has activity against many vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). In conjunction with a multicenter randomized trial of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for CDI treatment, we tested the hypothesis that fidaxomicin promotes VRE and Candida species colonization less than vancomycin. Stool was cultured for VRE and Candida species before and after therapy. For patients with negative pretreatment cultures, the incidence of VRE and Candida species acquisition was compared. For those with preexisting VRE, the change in concentration during treatment was compared. The susceptibility of VRE isolates to fidaxomicin was assessed. Of 301 patients, 247 (82%) had negative VRE cultures and 252 (84%) had negative Candida species cultures before treatment. In comparison with vancomycin-treated patients, fidaxomicin-treated patients had reduced acquisition of VRE (7% vs 31%, respectively; P < .001) and Candida species (19% vs 29%, respectively; P = .03). For patients with preexisting VRE, the mean concentration decreased significantly in the fidaxomicin group (5.9 vs 3.8 log(10) VRE/g stool; P = .01) but not the vancomycin group (5.3 vs 4.2 log(10) VRE/g stool; P = .20). Most VRE isolates recovered after fidaxomicin treatment had elevated fidaxomicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; MIC(90), 256 µg/mL), and subpopulations of VRE with elevated fidaxomicin MICs were common before therapy. Fidaxomicin was less likely than vancomycin to promote acquisition of VRE and Candida species during CDI treatment. However, selection of preexisting subpopulations of VRE with elevated fidaxomicin MICs was common during fidaxomicin therapy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00314951.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of subjects enrolled in the randomized trial of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection and of the subset evaluated for acquisition and overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Candida species. Abbreviations: CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentages of patients with negative pretreatment cultures for vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Candida species who acquired VRE or Candida species in stool during treatment of Clostridium difficile infection with vancomycin or fidaxomicin. The lower limit of detection was approximately 1 log10 colony-forming units per gram of stool. P values and 95% confidence intervals are included for the differences between treatment groups in the primary end point. Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Change in concentration of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in stool of colonized patients during treatment of Clostridium difficile infection with vancomycin (n = 27) and fidaxomicin (n = 27). The thin lines connect pre- and posttreatment values for the subset of 12 fidaxomicin- and 10 vancomycin-treated patients with posttreatment concentrations less than the limit of detection (approximately 1 log10 colony-forming unit [CFU] per gram of stool). The thick horizontal lines show the mean concentration of VRE (log10 CFU/g of stool) for each group. Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming unit; VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

References

    1. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431–55.
    1. Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ, van Dissel JT European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): treatment guidance for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:1067–79.
    1. Al-Nassir WN, Sethi AK, Li Y, Pultz MJ, Riggs MM, Donskey CJ. Both oral metronidazole and oral vancomycin promote persistent overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci during treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2403–6.
    1. Sethi AK, Al-Nassir WN, Nerandzic MM, Donskey CJ. Skin and environmental contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients receiving oral metronidazole or oral vancomycin treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:13–7.
    1. Edlund C, Barkholt L, Olsson-Liljequist B, Nord CE. Effect of vancomycin on intestinal flora of patients who previously received antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:729–32.
    1. Louie TJ, Emery J, Krulicki W, Byrne B, Mah M. OPT-80 eliminates Clostridium difficile and is sparing of Bacteroides species during treatment of C. difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:261–3.
    1. Donskey CJ, Chowdhry TK, Hecker MT, et al. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1925–32.
    1. Pultz NJ, Stiefel U, Ghannoum M, Helfand MS, Donskey CJ. Effect of parenteral antibiotic administration on establishment of intestinal colonization by Candida glabrata in adult mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:438–40.
    1. Cole GT, Halawa AA, Anaissie EJ. The role of the gastrointestinal tract in hematogenous candidiasis: from the laboratory to the bedside. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(Suppl 2):S73–88.
    1. Louie T, Miller M, Donskey C, Mullane K, Goldstein EJ. Clinical outcomes, safety, and pharmacokinetics of OPT-80 in a phase 2 trial with patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:223–8.
    1. Shue YK, Sears PS, Shangle S, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic studies of OPT-80 in healthy volunteers following single and multiple oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1391–5.
    1. Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM, et al. OPT-80-003 Clinical Study Group. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422–31.
    1. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2005.
    1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:503–35.
    1. Edmond MB, Ober JF, Weinbaum DL, et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: risk factors for infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1126–33.
    1. Leber AL, Hindler JF, Kato EO, Bruckner DA, Pegues DA. Laboratory-based surveillance for vancomycin-resistant enterococci: utility of screening stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22:160–4.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj