Effect of once-weekly semaglutide on the counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial

Stefan Korsatko, Lene Jensen, Martina Brunner, Stefanie Sach-Friedl, Maja D Tarp, Anders G Holst, Simon R Heller, Thomas R Pieber, Stefan Korsatko, Lene Jensen, Martina Brunner, Stefanie Sach-Friedl, Maja D Tarp, Anders G Holst, Simon R Heller, Thomas R Pieber

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effects of semaglutide vs placebo on glucagon and other counterregulatory hormones during hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre trial, we randomized 38 men and women (treated only with metformin) 1:1 to 2 12-week crossover periods of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide or placebo, each followed by a hypoglycaemic clamp procedure. The primary endpoint was change in glucagon concentration from target plasma glucose (PG) level 5.5 mmol/L to nadir (target 2.5 mmol/L).

Results: The mean (range) participant age was 54.2 (41-64) years, body mass index 29.4 (23.3-36.1) kg/m2 , glycated haemoglobin 60.8 (44.3-83.6) mmol/mol (7.7 [6.2-9.8]%), and diabetes duration 4.5 (0.3-13.2) years. A total of 35 participants completed the trial and were included in the analyses. During the hypoglycaemic clamp from 5.5 mmol/L PG to nadir, the absolute change in mean glucagon concentration was similar for semaglutide vs placebo: 88.3 vs 83.1 pg/mL (estimated difference 5.2 pg/mL [95% confidence interval -7.7 to 18.1]). Concentrations of other counterregulatory hormones increased with both treatments, with a statistically significantly lower increase for noradrenaline and cortisol with semaglutide vs placebo. The glucose infusion rate to maintain constant clamp levels was similar for each treatment group, suggesting an overall similar counterregulatory response. The mean hypoglycaemic symptom score and proportion of participants recognizing hypoglycaemia during the study were lower for semaglutide vs placebo treatment at nadir, but cognitive function test results were similar. No new safety issues were observed for semaglutide.

Conclusions: Semaglutide treatment did not compromise the counterregulatory glucagon response during experimental hypoglycaemia in people with T2D.

Keywords: GLP-1; GLP-1 analogue; hypoglycaemia; type 2 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article are reported by S.K., M.B. or S.S. S.R.H. has served on speaker panels for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis and Takeda, for which he has received personal remuneration. He has consulted for Boeringher Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Takeda, for which his institution has received remuneration. T.R.P. declares Board membership for Adocia, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, and institutional grants from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk, and payment for lectures/speakers bureaus from Novo Nordisk. L.J., M.D.T. and A.G.H. are employed by and hold stock in Novo Nordisk.

© 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Trial design. Semaglutide was self‐injected once weekly with the starting dose of 0.25 mg for 4 weeks (starting at week 0), increasing to 0.5 mg for the next 4 weeks and subsequently to 1.0 mg for 5 weeks. Assessments were made after the 5th dose of 1.0 mg semaglutide. Placebo was given in doses volume‐matched to semaglutide. B, Hypoglycaemic clamp design. Response assessments included counterregulatory hormones, C‐peptide, hypoglycaemic symptoms, hypoglycaemic recognition, cognitive function tests, and vital signs. GIR, glucose infusion rate; PG, plasma glucose; PK, pharmacokinetics
Figure 2
Figure 2
Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemic clamp: A, glucagon; B, adrenaline; C, noradrenaline; D, cortisol; E, growth hormone and F, C‐peptide. Graphs show geometric means and standard error bars. Of the 37 participants included in the full analysis set, 35 completed both treatment periods and are included in the analysis. Mean (SD) fasting plasma glucose concentrations (prior to the clamp) were 6.6 (1.3) mmol/L for semaglutide and 8.8 (2.6) mmol/L for placebo. For glucagon SI units (ng/L), please use the conversion factor 1.0. For adrenaline SI units (pmol/L), please use the conversion factor 5.459. For noradrenaline SI units (pmol/L), please use the conversion factor 5.911. For cortisol SI units (nmol/L), SI units (pmol/L), please use the conversion factor 27.588. For growth hormone SI units (μg/L), please use the conversion factor 1.0. *P < 0.05 for semaglutide vs placebo from analysis of covariance. NA, not analysed; NS, not significant
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hypoglycaemic symptom score. The score was based on responses to 11 questions, providing a total score of between 11 and 77, with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. Graph shows geometric means and standard error bars. *P < 0.05 for semaglutide vs placebo from analysis of covariance. NS, not significant

References

    1. Halban PA, Polonsky KS, Bowden DW, et al. ß‐Cell failure in type 2 diabetes: postulated mechanisms and prospects for prevention and treatment. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1751‐1758.
    1. Ahren B. Glucagon‐early breakthroughs and recent discoveries. Peptides. 2015;67:74‐81.
    1. Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1384‐1395.
    1. Christensen M, Bagger JI, Vilsbøll T, Knop FK. The alpha‐cell as target for type 2 diabetes therapy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011;8:369‐381.
    1. Lund A, Bagger JI, Christensen M, Knop FK, Vilsbøll T. Glucagon and type 2 diabetes: the return of the alpha cell. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:555.
    1. Sprague JE, Arbelaez AM. Glucose counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2011;9:463‐473.
    1. Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2010;39:641‐654.
    1. Cryer PE, Davis SN. Hypoglycemia Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. The McGraw‐Hill Companies, Inc., USA; 2012.
    1. Zammit NN, Frier BM. Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Pathophysiology, frequency, and effects of different treatment modalities. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2948‐2961.
    1. Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes. 2008;57:3169‐3176.
    1. Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon‐like peptide 1 promotes satiety and suppresses energy intake in humans. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:515‐520.
    1. Lau J, Bloch P, Schaffer L, et al. Discovery of the once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analogue semaglutide. J Med Chem. 2015;58:7370‐7380.
    1. Kapitza C, Nosek L, Jensen L, Hartvig H, Jensen CB, Flint A. Semaglutide, a once‐weekly human GLP‐1 analog, does not reduce the bioavailability of the combined oral contraceptive, ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55:497‐504.
    1. Sorli C, Harashima S, Tsoukas GM, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet. 2017;5(4):251‐260.
    1. Bo A, Masmiquel L, Kumar H, et al. Efficacy and safety of once weekly semaglutide versus sitagliptin as add‐on to metformin and/or thiazolidinediones in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56‐week randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:341‐354.
    1. Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of once‐weekly semaglutide versus once‐daily insulin glargine in insulin‐naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised open‐label clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes. 2017;5:355‐366.
    1. Pieber TR, Deller S, Korsatko S, et al. Counter‐regulatory hormone responses to hypoglycaemia in subjects with type 1 diabetes following 4 weeks of treatment with liraglutide adjunct to insulin: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:742‐750.
    1. Nauck MA, El Ouaghlidi A, Hompesch M, Jacobsen J, Elbroend B. No impairment of hypoglycemia counterregulation via glucagon with the long‐acting GLP‐1 derivative, NN2211, in subjects with type 2‐diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46(Supplement 2):A285.
    1. Yabe D, Eto T, Shiramoto M, et al. Effects of DPP‐4 inhibitor linagliptin and GLP‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide on physiological response to hypoglycaemia in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm parallel comparative, exploratory trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(3):442‐447.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki . Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2000;284:3043‐3045.
    1. ICH Expert Working Group. International Conference on Harmonisation . ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Good Clinical Practice, 2003. . Accessed December 21, 2017.
    1. Koehler G, Heller S, Korsatko S, et al. Insulin degludec is not associated with a delayed or diminished response to hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine in type 1 diabetes: a double‐blind randomised crossover study. Diabetologia. 2014;57:40‐49.
    1. McAulay V, Deary IJ, Frier BM. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2001;18:690‐705.
    1. Deary IJ, Hepburn DA, MacLeod KM, Frier BM. Partitioning the symptoms of hypoglycaemia using multi‐sample confirmatory factor analysis. Diabetologia. 1993;36:771‐777.
    1. Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2277‐2281.
    1. Wechsler D. Manual of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ‐ Revised. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation Ltd; 1981.
    1. Wilkinson RT, Houghton D. Portable four choice reaction time test with magnetic tape memory. Behav Res Methods Instrum. 1975;7:441‐446.
    1. Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Hartmann B, Veedfald S, et al. Hyperglucagonaemia analysed by glucagon sandwich ELISA: nonspecific interference or truly elevated levels? Diabetologia. 2014;57:1919‐1926.
    1. Kapitza C, Dahl K, Bonde Jacobsen J, Axelsen MB, Flint A. The effects of once‐weekly semaglutide on beta‐cell function in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;120:S127‐S128.
    1. Creutzfeldt WO, Kleine N, Willms B, Orskov C, Holst JJ, Nauck MA. Glucagonostatic actions and reduction of fasting hyperglycemia by exogenous glucagon‐like peptide I(7‐36) amide in type I diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:580‐586.
    1. Nauck MA, Heimesaat MM, Behle K, et al. Effects of glucagon‐like peptide 1 on counterregulatory hormone responses, cognitive functions, and insulin secretion during hyperinsulinemic, stepped hypoglycemic clamp experiments in healthy volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1239‐1246.
    1. Hompesch M, Jones‐Leone A, Carr MC, et al. Albiglutide does not impair the counter‐regulatory hormone response to hypoglycaemia: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, stepped glucose clamp study in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:82‐90.
    1. Farngren J, Persson M, Ahren B. Effect of the GLP‐1 receptor agonist lixisenatide on counterregulatory responses to hypoglyemia in subjects with insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:242‐249.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834‐1844.
    1. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown‐Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311‐322.
    1. Robinson LE, Holt TA, Rees K, Randeva HS, O'Hare JP. Effects of exenatide and liraglutide on heart rate, blood pressure and body weight: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001986.
    1. Davis SN, Fowler S, Costa F. Hypoglycemic counterregulatory responses differ between men and women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2000;49:65‐72.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj