Improving performance of Zambia Defence Force antiretroviral therapy providers: evaluation of a standards-based approach

Young Mi Kim, Joseph Banda, Webby Kanjipite, Supriya Sarkar, Eva Bazant, Cyndi Hiner, Maya Tholandi, Stephanie Reinhardt, Panganani Dalisani Njobvu, Adrienne Kols, Bruno Benavides, Young Mi Kim, Joseph Banda, Webby Kanjipite, Supriya Sarkar, Eva Bazant, Cyndi Hiner, Maya Tholandi, Stephanie Reinhardt, Panganani Dalisani Njobvu, Adrienne Kols, Bruno Benavides

Abstract

Background: The Zambia Defence Force (ZDF) has applied the Standards-Based Management and Recognition (SBM-R®) approach, which uses detailed performance standards, at some health facilities to improve HIV-related services offered to military personnel and surrounding civilian communities. This study examines the effectiveness of the SBM-R approach in improving facility readiness and provider performance at ZDF facilities.

Methods: We collected data on facility readiness and provider performance before and after the 2010-2012 intervention at 4 intervention sites selected for their relatively poor performance and 4 comparison sites. Assessors observed whether each facility met 16 readiness standards and whether providers met 9 performance standards during consultations with 354 returning antiretroviral therapy (ART) clients. We then calculated the percentages of criteria achieved for each readiness and performance standard and conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses of provider performance data.

Results: Facilities' ART readiness scores exceeded 80% before the intervention at both intervention and comparison sites. At endline, scores improved on 4 facility readiness standards in the intervention group but on only 1 standard in the comparison group. Multivariate analysis found that the overall provider performance score increased significantly in the intervention group (from 58% to 84%; P<.01) but not in the comparison group (from 62% to 70%). The before-and-after improvement in scores was significantly greater among intervention sites than among comparison sites for 2 standards-initial assessment of the client's condition and nutrition counseling.

Conclusion: The standards-based approach, which involved intensive and mutually reinforcing intervention activities, showed modest improvements in some aspects of providers' performance during ART consultations. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in provider performance affect client outcomes such as adherence to ART.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The 4 Steps of the Standards-Based Management and Recognition (SBM-R) Approach
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Provider Performance: Percentage of Verification Criteria Achieved n  =  175 at baseline; 179 at endline. *P<.001

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO), UNAIDS, and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). Global HIV/AIDS response: epidemic update and health sector progress towards universal access. Progress report 2011. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from:
    1. UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2012. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2012. Available from:
    1. National AIDS Council (NAC) [Zambia]. Zambia country report: monitoring the declaration of commitment on HIV and AIDS and the universal access. Biennial report submitted to the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV and AIDS. Lusaka, Zambia: NAC; 2012. Available from:
    1. Frontiers Development and Research Group, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Global HIV/AIDS initiatives in Zambia: issues of scale up and health systems capacity. Interim district report. Lusaka, Zambia: Global HIV/AIDS Initiatives Network; 2008. Available from:
    1. Ba O., O'Regan C., Nachega J., Cooper C., Anema A., Rachlis B., et al. HIV/AIDS in African militaries: an ecological analysis. Med Confl Surviv. 2008;24(2), 88–100 10.1080/13623690801950260
    1. UNAIDS. AIDS and the military. UNAIDS best practice collection. Geneva: UNAIDS; 1998. Available from:
    1. Zambia Defence Force (ZDF). HIV and AIDS strategic plan 2009–2014. Lusaka, Zambia: ZDF; 2009
    1. Central Statistical Office (CSO); Central Board of Health; ORC Macro. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2001–2002. Calverton, MD: CSO, Central Board of Health, and ORC Macro; 2003. Available from:
    1. Phiri A. N., Simapuka L. HIV/AIDS in the armed forces: policy and mitigating strategies in Zambia. Rupiya M, editor. The enemy within: southern African militaries' quarter-century battle with HIV and AIDS. Pretoria, South Africa: Institute for Security Studies; 2006. p. 91–122 Available from:
    1. Njobvu P. HIV prevention strategies: drivers of the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Lusaka, Zambia: Defence Force Medical Service; 2012
    1. Central Statistical Office (CSO); Ministry of Health (MOH); University of Zambia; MEASURE Evaluation. Zambia sexual behaviour survey 2009. Lusaka, Zambia: CSO and MEASURE Evaluation; 2010. Available from:
    1. Banda M. Leveraging resources for DBS in Zambia Defence Force facilities. Conference report of International Military HIV/AIDS Conference: 12–15 April 2010; Arusha, Tanzania. San Diego: US Department of Defense HIV/AIDS Prevention Program; 2010. p. 144–146
    1. Necochea E., Bossemeyer D. Standards-Based Management and Recognition—a field guide: a practical approach for improving the performance and quality of health services. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego; 2005. Available from:
    1. Necochea E., Bossemeyer D. Standards-Based Management and Recognition (SBM-R)—a field guide: an innovative approach to improving performance and quality of health services in limited resource settings. Presented at the XVI International AIDS Conference, 13–18 August 2006, Toronto, Canada.
    1. Franco L. M., Marquez L. Effectiveness of collaborative improvement: evidence from 27 applications in 12 less-developed and middle-income countries. BMJ Quality and Safety 2011;20658e665 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044388
    1. Raven J., Hofman J., Adegoke A., van den Broek N. Methodology and tools for quality improvement in maternal and newborn health care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114(1), 4–9 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.02.007
    1. Rawlins B. J., Kim Y. M., Rozario A. M., Bazant E., Rashidi T., Bandazi S. N., et al. Reproductive health services in Malawi: an evaluation of a quality improvement intervention. Midwifery. 2013;29(1), 53–59 10.1016/j.midw.2011.10.005
    1. Williams R. L. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56(2), 645–646 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x
    1. John Snow, Inc. [Internet]. Boston: John Snow, Inc. and JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.; c2012 [cited 2012 Sep 25] Zambia Defense Force health system strengthening; [1 screen]. Available from:
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global health sector strategy on HIV/AIDS 2011–2015. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from:
    1. Fisher A., Foreit J. Designing HIV/AIDS intervention studies: an operations research handbook. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2002. Available from:
    1. Franco L. M., Franco C., Kumwenda N., Nkhoma W. Methods for assessing quality of provider performance in developing countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14 Suppl 117–24 10.1093/intqhc/14.suppl_1.17
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). The strategic use of antiretrovirals to help end the HIV epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from:
    1. Musheke M., Bond V., Merten S. Individual and contextual factors influencing patient attrition from antiretroviral therapy care in an urban community of Lusaka, Zambia. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15 Suppl 11–9 10.7448/IAS.15.3.17366
    1. Sanjobo N., Frich J. C., Fretheim A. Barriers and facilitators to patients' adherence to antiretroviral treatment in Zambia: a qualitative study. SAHARA-J. 2008;5(3), 136–143 10.1080/17290376.2008.9724912
    1. Merten S., Kenter E., McKenzie O., Musheke M., Ntalasha H., Martin-Hilber A. Patient-reported barriers and drivers of adherence to antiretrovirals in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-ethnography. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15 Suppl 116–33 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02510.x

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj