Idelalisib addition has neutral to beneficial effects on quality of life in bendamustine/rituximab-treated patients: results of a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial

Marco Montillo, Árpád Illés, Tadeusz Robak, Alexander S Pristupa, Malgorzata Wach, Miklós Egyed, Julio Delgado, Wojciech Jurczak, Franck Morschhauser, Anna Schuh, Herbert Eradat, Sanatan Shreay, Jacqueline C Barrientos, Andrew D Zelenetz, Marco Montillo, Árpád Illés, Tadeusz Robak, Alexander S Pristupa, Malgorzata Wach, Miklós Egyed, Julio Delgado, Wojciech Jurczak, Franck Morschhauser, Anna Schuh, Herbert Eradat, Sanatan Shreay, Jacqueline C Barrientos, Andrew D Zelenetz

Abstract

Background: In a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with idelalisib, a phosphoinositol-3 kinase δ inhibitor, + bendamustine/rituximab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL). Here we report the results of health-related quality of life (HRQL) analyses from this study.

Methods: From June 15, 2012 to August 21, 2014, 416 patients with R/R CLL were enrolled; 207 patients were randomized to the idelalisib arm and 209 to the placebo arm. In the 416 patients randomized to receive bendamustine/rituximab and either oral idelalisib 150 mg twice-daily or placebo, HRQL was assessed at baseline and throughout the blinded part of the study using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) and EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires. The assessments were performed at scheduled patient visits; every 4 weeks for the first 6 months from the initiation of treatment, then every 8 weeks for the next 6 months, and every 12 weeks thereafter until end of study. Least-squares mean changes from baseline were estimated using a mixed-effects model by including treatment, time, and treatment-by-time interaction, and stratification factors as fixed effects. Time to first symptom improvement was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: In mixed-effects model analysis, idelalisib + bendamustine/rituximab treatment led to clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in leukemia-associated symptoms. Moreover, per Kaplan-Meier analysis, the proportion of patients with symptom improvement was higher and time to improvement was shorter among patients in the idelalisib-containing arm compared with those who did not receive idelalisib. The physical and social/family FACT-Leu subscale scores, along with the self-rated health assessed by EQ-VAS, showed improvement with idelalisib over placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The functional and emotional FACT-Leu subscale scores remained similar to placebo.

Conclusions: Addition of idelalisib to bendamustine/rituximab, apart from improving PFS and OS, had a neutral to beneficial impact on HRQL in patients with R/R CLL, particularly by reducing leukemia-specific disease symptoms.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01569295. Registered April 3, 2012.

Keywords: Health-related quality of life; Idelalisib; Patient-related outcomes; Randomized phase 3 study; Relapsed/refractory CLL.

Conflict of interest statement

MM reports research grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; as well as personal fees from Janssen, Roche, and Novartis. AI, ASP, ME, and WJ report institutional research grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc. TR reports research support and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, Inc. MW reports nothing to disclose. JD reports consulting and lecturing fees from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Roche; and GSK-Novartis. FM reports personal fees from Celgene; Genentech/Roche; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and Janssen. AS reports honoraria from AbbVie; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; and Roche; and nonrestricted educational grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and Janssen. HE reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; AbbVie; Genentech; Pharmacyclics; and Janssen; consulting or advisory roles with Gilead Sciences, Inc.; AbbVie; Genentech; Pharmacyclics; and Janssen; speakers’ bureau fees from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; AbbVie; Genentech; Pharmacyclics; and Takeda; and research funding from Gilead Sciences, Inc.; AbbVie; Genentech; Pharmacyclics; Roche; Celgene; Novartis; Kite; GlaxoSmithKline; AstraZeneca; ATARA; BeiGene; TG Therapeutics; and Verastem. SS is an employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and may hold stock. JCB reports consulting or advisory roles with Pharmacyclics/AbbVie; Janssen; Genentech; and Gilead Sciences, Inc.; honoraria from Janssen; and institutional research funding from Pharmacyclics/AbbVie and Gilead Sciences, Inc. ADZ reports honoraria from Genentech/Roche; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Celgene; Janssen; Amgen; Novartis; and Adaptive Biotech; consulting or advisory roles with Genentech/Roche; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Celgene; Janssen; Amgen; Novartis; Adaptive Biotechnologies; and MEI Pharma; research funding from MEI Pharma; Genentech/Roche; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; BeiGene; and AbbVie; travel, accommodations, and expenses paid by Roche; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; and Celgene; and acting as a Data Monitoring Committee Chair for BeiGene.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mixed-effects model analysis of FACT-Leu. a, FWB; b, EWB; c, PWB; d, S/FWB; e, LeuS; f, TOI score; g, FACT-Leu total score. Curves above the x-axis indicate positive effects, and curves below the axis show negative effects. Gray area denotes MID range. aP = 0.0525 for treatment difference. bP = 0.0192 for treatment difference. cP = 0.0343 for treatment difference. CI confidence interval, EWB emotional well-being, FACT-Leu Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Leukemia, FWB functional well-being, LeuS leukemia-specific symptoms, MID minimally important difference, PWB physical well-being, S/FWB social/family well-being, TOI trial outcome index
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent of patients with improvements in FACT-Leu subscales (Kaplan-Meier analysis). a, PWB; b, S/FWB; c, LeuS; d, EWB; e, FWB. EWB emotional well-being, FACT-Leu Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Leukemia, FWB functional well-being, LeuS leukemia-specific symptoms, PWB physical well-being, S/FWB social/family well-being
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mixed-effects model analysis of EuroQoL Five-Dimension VAS. CI confidence interval, VAS visual analogue scale

References

    1. SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2015. Available at . Accessed 22 Oct 2018.
    1. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology 2017;Version I.2017-September 28, 2016.
    1. Badoux XC, Keating MJ, Wierda WG. What is the best frontline therapy for patients with CLL and 17p deletion? Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2011;6:36–46. doi: 10.1007/s11899-010-0069-3.
    1. Dicker F, Herholz H, Schnittger S, Nakao A, Patten N, Wu L, et al. The detection of TP53 mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia independently predicts rapid disease progression and is highly correlated with a complex aberrant karyotype. Leukemia. 2009;23:117–124. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.274.
    1. Dohner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A, Leupolt E, Krober A, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1910–1916. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012283432602.
    1. Stilgenbauer S, Sander S, Bullinger L, Benner A, Leupolt E, Winkler D, et al. Clonal evolution in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: acquisition of high-risk genomic aberrations associated with unmutated VH, resistance to therapy, and short survival. Haematologica. 2007;92:1242–1245. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10720.
    1. Shanafelt T. Treatment of older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: key questions and current answers. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:158–167. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.158.
    1. Smolej L. How I treat elderly or comorbid patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2010;53:213–220. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2016.79.
    1. Smolej L. Therapy of elderly/comorbid patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:3399–3405. doi: 10.2174/138161212801227096.
    1. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; 2011. Available at . Accessed 12 Feb 2016.
    1. Veliz M, Pinilla-Ibarz J. Treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Control. 2012;19:37–53. doi: 10.1177/107327481201900105.
    1. Shanafelt TD, Bowen D, Venkat C, Slager SL, Zent CS, Kay NE, et al. Quality of life in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an international survey of 1482 patients. Br J Haematol. 2007;139:255–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06791.x.
    1. Holtzer-Goor KM, Schaafsma MR, Joosten P, Posthuma EF, Wittebol S, Huijgens PC, et al. Quality of life of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands: results of a longitudinal multicentre study. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:2895–2906. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1039-y.
    1. Molica S. Quality of life in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a neglected issue. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005;46:1709–1714. doi: 10.1080/10428190500244183.
    1. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, Reeve BB, Smith ML, Coons SJ, et al. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4249–4255. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5967.
    1. Garcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB, Flynn KE, Lad T, Lai JS, et al. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5106–5112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341.
    1. Hallek Michael, Cheson Bruce D., Catovsky Daniel, Caligaris-Cappio Federico, Dighiero Guillaume, Döhner Hartmut, Hillmen Peter, Keating Michael J., Montserrat Emili, Rai Kanti R., Kipps Thomas J. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute–Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111(12):5446–5456. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-093906.
    1. Cannella L, Caocci G, Jacobs M, Vignetti M, Mandelli F, Efficace F. Health-related quality of life and symptom assessment in randomized controlled trials of patients with leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: what have we learned? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015;96:542–554. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.07.012.
    1. Catovsky D, Richards S, Matutes E, Oscier D, Dyer MJ, Bezares RF, et al. Assessment of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (the LRF CLL4 trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:230–239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61125-8.
    1. Eichhorst BF, Busch R, Obwandner T, Kuhn-Hallek I, Herschbach P, Hallek M, German CLL Study Group. Health-related quality of life in younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide or fludarabine alone for first-line therapy: a study by the German CLL Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1722–31.
    1. Robak T, Warzocha K, Govind Babu K, Kulyaba Y, Kuliczkowski K, Abdulkadyrov K, et al. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in the COMPLEMENT 2 trial of patients with relapsed CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58:1598–1606. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1253837.
    1. ZYDELIG® (idelalisib) Prescribing Information. Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA. Available at 2018;2016.
    1. Zelenetz AD, Barrientos JC, Brown JR, Coiffier B, Delgado J, Egyed M, et al. Idelalisib or placebo in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: interim results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:297–311. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30671-4.
    1. Brucker Penny S., Yost Kathleen, Cashy John, Webster Kimberly, Cella David. General Population and Cancer Patient Norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2005;28(2):192–211. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275341.
    1. Cella D F, Tulsky D S, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen S B, Winicour P, Brannon J. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1993;11(3):570–579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
    1. Victorson David, Barocas Joshua, Song Juliette, Cella David. Reliability across studies from the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and its subscales: a reliability generalization. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17(9):1137–1146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9398-2.
    1. Webster K, Chivington K, Shonk C, Eremenco S, Yount S, Hahn E. Measuring quality of life (QOL) among patients with leukemia: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Leukemia (FACT-LEU). Qual Life Res. 2002;11:Abstract 678.
    1. Cella David, Jensen Sally E., Webster Kimberly, Hongyan Du, Lai Jin-Shei, Rosen Steven, Tallman Martin S., Yount Susan. Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Leukemia: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Questionnaire. Value in Health. 2012;15(8):1051–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2210.
    1. EuroQol G. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
    1. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33:337–343. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.
    1. , 2015. . Accessed 09 Mar 2017
    1. EuroQol Research Foundation . EQ-5D-5L User Guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument version 2.1. 2015.
    1. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203–220. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
    1. Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-70.
    1. Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE, Cheson BD, Pagel JM, Hillmen P, et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:997–1007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315226.
    1. Jones JA, Robak T, Brown JR, Awan FT, Badoux X, Coutre S, et al. Efficacy and safety of idelalisib in combination with ofatumumab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e114–ee26. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30019-4.
    1. Cramer Paula, Fraser Graeme, Santucci-Silva Rodrigo, Grosicki Sebastian, Dilhuydy Marie-Sarah, Janssens Ann, Loscertales Javier, Rule Simon, Goy Andre, Traina Shana, Chan Eric K. H., Diels Joris, Sengupta Nishan, Mahler Michelle, Salman Mariya, Howes Angela, Chanan-Khan Asher. Improvement of fatigue, physical functioning, and well-being among patients with severe impairment at baseline receiving ibrutinib in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in the HELIOS study. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2018;59(9):2075–2084. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1416364.
    1. Hillmen P, Janssens A, Babu KG, Kloczko J, Grosicki S, Manson S, et al. Health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes of ofatumumab plus chlorambucil versus chlorambucil monotherapy in the COMPLEMENT 1 trial of patients with previously untreated CLL. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:1115–1120. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1205217.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj