Prospective, randomized trial on intensive SMBG management added value in non-insulin-treated T2DM patients (PRISMA): a study to determine the effect of a structured SMBG intervention

Marina Scavini, Emanuele Bosi, Antonio Ceriello, Francesco Giorgino, Massimo Porta, Antonio Tiengo, Giacomo Vespasiani, Davide Bottalico, Raffaele Marino, Christopher Parkin, Erminio Bonizzoni, Domenico Cucinotta, Marina Scavini, Emanuele Bosi, Antonio Ceriello, Francesco Giorgino, Massimo Porta, Antonio Tiengo, Giacomo Vespasiani, Davide Bottalico, Raffaele Marino, Christopher Parkin, Erminio Bonizzoni, Domenico Cucinotta

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a core component of diabetes management. However, the International Diabetes Federation recommends that SMBG be performed in a structured manner and that the data are accurately interpreted and used to take appropriate therapeutic actions. We designed a study to evaluate the impact of structured SMBG on glycemic control in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. The Prospective, Randomized Trial on Intensive SMBG Management Added Value in Non-insulin-Treated T2DM Patients (PRISMA) is a 12-month, prospective, multicenter, open, parallel group, randomized, and controlled trial to evaluate the added value of an intensive, structured SMBG regimen in T2DM patients treated with oral agents and/or diet. One thousand patients (500 per arm) will be enrolled at 39 clinical sites in Italy. Eligible patients will be randomized to the intensive structured monitoring (ISM) group or the active control (AC) group, with a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) target of <7.0%. Intervention will comprise (1) structured SMBG (4-point daily glucose profiles on 3 days per week [ISM]; discretionary, unstructured SMBG [AC]); (2) comprehensive patient education (both groups); and (3) clinician's adjustment of diabetes medications using an algorithm targeting SMBG levels, HbA1c and hypoglycemia (ISM) or HbA1c and hypoglycemia (AC). The intervention and trial design build upon previous research by emphasizing appropriate and collaborative use of SMBG by both patients and physicians. Utilization of per protocol and intent-to-treat analyses facilitates assessment of the intervention. Inclusion of multiple dependent variables allows us to assess the broader impact of the intervention, including changes in patient and physician attitudes and behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00643474.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the PRISMA study protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Data analysis system. The print-out of the Smart-Pix device is organized in four boxes: Box 1 shows mean, standard deviation, and number of glucose measurements during the previous 4 weeks, by point of the daily profile presented as a bar graph; Box 2 shows mean and number of glucose measurements during the previous 4 weeks before breakfast and lunch and mean and number of post-prandial glycemic excursion, each presented as a speed dial: the pointer in the green zone indicates desirable values, in the yellow zone values that requires attention, and in the red zone values that require corrective action; the number of hypoglycemic episodes is reported in a dot that changes color from green (no glucose value <70 mg/dl) to red when blood glucose values <70 mg/dl are measured; Box 3 shows the low blood glucose index (LBGI) and high blood glucose index (HBGI) [40] and the average daily risk range (ADRR) [49] calculated on the glucose values since the last visit and presented as a bar graph in green color if in the desired range, in red if outside the desired range; and Box 4 shows the suggested changes in diabetes medication according to the algorithm presented in Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Diabetes medication algorithm. The diabetes medication algorithm is based on guidelines by international and national scientific societies [American Diabetes Association (ADA), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID) and Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)] [–39]

References

    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–986. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401.
    1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2643–2653. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187.
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet. 1998;352:837–853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6.
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.
    1. Gaede P, Vedel P, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study. Lancet. 1999;353:617–622. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07368-1.
    1. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–2559. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743.
    1. Riddle MC, Ambrosius WT, Brillon DJ, et al. Epidemiologic relationships between A1C and all-cause mortality during a median 3.4-year follow-up of glycemic treatment in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:983–990. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1278.
    1. Shiraiwa T, Kaneto H, Miyatsuka T, et al. Post-prandial hyperglycemia is an important predictor of the incidence of diabetic microangiopathy in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;336:339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.158.
    1. Sorkin JD, Muller DC, Fleg JL, Andres R. The relation of fasting and 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose concentrations to mortality: data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging with a critical review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2626–2632. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2626.
    1. Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Schaper F et al ((1999) Postprandial plasma glucose is an independent risk factor for increased carotid intima-media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Atherosclerosis 144:229–235
    1. Cavalot F, Petrelli A, Traversa M, et al. Postprandial blood glucose is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular events than fasting blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly in women: lessons from the San Luigi Gonzaga Diabetes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:813–819. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1005.
    1. Temelkova-Kurktschiev TS, Koehler C, Henkel E, et al. Postchallenge plasma glucose and glycemic spikes are more strongly associated with atherosclerosis than fasting glucose or HbA1c level. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1830–1834. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.12.1830.
    1. Esposito K, Nappo F, Marfella R, et al. Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycemia in humans: role of oxidative stress. Circulation. 2002;106:2067–2072. doi: 10.1161/.
    1. Esposito K, Ciotola M, Carleo D, et al. Post-meal glucose peaks at home associate with carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:1345–1350. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2000.
    1. Hanefeld M, Cagatay M, Petrowitsch T, et al. Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies. EurHeart J. 2004;25:10–16.
    1. Hanefeld M, Chiasson JL, Koehler C, et al. Acarbose slows progression of intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Stroke. 2004;35:1073–1078. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125864.01546.f2.
    1. Esposito K, Giugliano D, Nappo F, Marfella R. Regression of carotid atherosclerosis by control of postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2004;110:214–219. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000134501.57864.66.
    1. Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, et al. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2006;295:1681–1687. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1681.
    1. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, et al. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes. 1970;19:644–655.
    1. International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines Taskforce and International SMBG Working Group (2009) Global guideline on self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes. International Diabetes Federation. Accessed June 2010 at
    1. Parkin CG, Davidson JA. Value of self-monitoring blood glucose pattern analysis in improving diabetes outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:500–508.
    1. Evans JM, Newton RW, Ruta DA, et al. Frequency of blood glucose monitoring in relation to glycaemic control: observational study with diabetes database. BMJ. 1999;319:83–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7202.83.
    1. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001;111:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00742-2.
    1. Nathan DM, McKitrick C, Larkin M, et al. Glycemic control in diabetes mellitus: have changes in therapy made a difference? Am J Med. 1996;100:157–163. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89453-3.
    1. Farmer A, Wade A, Goyder E, et al. Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial. BMJ. 2007;335:132. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. O’Kane MJ, Bunting B, Copeland M, Coates VE. Efficacy of self monitoring of blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ESMON study): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;336:1174–1177. doi: 10.1136/.
    1. Davidson MB, Castellanos M, Kain D, Duran P. The effect of self monitoring of blood glucose concentrations on glycated hemoglobin levels in diabetic patients not taking insulin: a blinded, randomized trial. Am J Med. 2005;118:422–425. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.006.
    1. Polonsky W, Fisher L, Schikman C et al (2010) The value of episodic, intensive blood glucose monitoring in non-insulin treated persons with type 2 diabetes: design of the Structured Testing Program (STeP) study, a cluster-randomised, clinical trial [NCT00674986]. BMC Fam Pract 11:37. Accessed June 2011 at
    1. Klonoff D, Bergenstal R, Blonde LSA, et al. Consensus report of the coalition for clinical research—self-monitoring of blood glucose. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2:1030–1053.
    1. Kempf K, Kruse J, Martin S, ROSSO-in-praxi A self-monitoring of blood glucose-structured 12-week lifestyle intervention significantly improves glucometabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12:547–553. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0008.
    1. Bonomo K, De Salve A, Fiora E, et al. Evaluation of a simple policy for pre- and post-prandial blood glucose self-monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes not on insulin. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.021.
    1. Duran A, Martin P, Runkle I, et al. Benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose in the management of new-onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: the St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic-based interventional study with parallel groups. J Diabetes. 2010;2:203–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00081.x.
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: results from the structured testing program study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:262–267. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1732.
    1. Franciosi M, Lucisano G, Pellegrini F, Cantarello A, Consoli A, Cucco L, Ghidelli R, Sartore G, Sciangula L, Nicolucci A; for the ROSES Study Group (2011) ROSES: role of self-monitoring of blood glucose and intensive education in patients with Type 2 diabetes not receiving insulin. A pilot randomized clinical trial. Diabet Med 28(7):789–796, doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03268.x
    1. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 1997;277:925–926. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540350075038.
    1. American Diabetes Association (2011) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care 34(Suppl 1):S11–S61
    1. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1963–1972. doi: 10.2337/dc06-9912.
    1. International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines Task Force (2005) Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Int Diabetes Federat. Accessed June 2010 at
    1. Diabetologia AMD-SId. Standard Italiani per la Cura del Diabete Mellito. 2010
    1. Kovatchev BP, Straume M, Cox DJ, Farhy LS. Risk analysis of blood glucose data: a quantitative approach to optimizing the control of insulin dependent diabetes. J Theor Med. 2000;3:1–10. doi: 10.1080/10273660008833060.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al. Assessment of risk for severe hypoglycemia among adults with IDDM: validation of the low blood glucose index. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1870–1875. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1870.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Clarke WL. Methods for quantifying self-monitoring blood glucose profiles exemplified by an examination of blood glucose patterns in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002;4:295–303. doi: 10.1089/152091502760098438.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Kumar A, et al. Algorithmic evaluation of metabolic control and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2003;5:817–828. doi: 10.1089/152091503322527021.
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002.
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). The DCCT research group. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:725–732. doi: 10.2337/diacare.11.9.725.
    1. Trento M, Passera P, Borgo E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:670–675. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.670.
    1. Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Structure and correlates of diabetes-specific locus of control. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:994–1001. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.9.994.
    1. Trento M, Tomelini M, Basile M, et al. The locus of control in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes managed by individual and group care. Diabet Med. 2008;25:86–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02319.x.
    1. Kovatchev BP, Otto E, Cox D, et al. Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2433–2438. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1085.
    1. Pradelles P, Grassi J, Maclouf J. Enzyme immunoassays of eicosanoids using acetylcholine esterase as label: an alternative to radioimmunoassay. Anal Chem. 1985;57:1170–1173. doi: 10.1021/ac00284a003.
    1. Heyting A, Tolboom JT, Essers JG. Statistical handling of drop-outs in longitudinal clinical trials. Stat Med. 1992;11:2043–2061. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111603.
    1. AMD Annals. Quality indicators of diabetes care in Italy. . Accessed Nov 2011

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj