Effect of topical treatment with 7.5% urea in Ichthyosis Vulgaris: A randomized, controlled, double blinded, split body study evaluating the effect of urea cream compared to the vehicle (moisturizing) cream

I L H Dorf, M S Lunen, U Koppelhus, I L H Dorf, M S Lunen, U Koppelhus

Abstract

Background: Ichthyosis Vulgaris (IV) is a common genetic skin disease, characterized by dry, scaling skin and itch. Urea cream has been a central part of IV treatment for decades, but only few studies have evaluated the effect of urea compared to basic moisturizers.

Objective: To evaluate the treatment effect of 7.5% urea cream compared to a basic moisturizer in patients with IV.

Methods: Participants (n = 14) were randomized to apply the 7.5% urea cream on one body half and a basic moisturizer on the other during a study period of 4 weeks. Measuring points on participants arms and legs were evaluated at baseline and at endpoint with a patient questionnaire visual assessment scale (VAS), a clinical scoring, and electronic skin hydration analysis to assess the treatment effects.

Results: On the arms, no significant differences between the two treatments were found. On the legs, however, the urea treated areas had a significantly higher decrease in SRRC score (0.7 points [95% CI: 1.1-0.3, p < 0.005]) and increase in hydration (32.1 μS [95% CI: 10.9-53.2, p < 0.006]).

Conclusion: Skin hydration improved significantly with both urea and moisturising treatment. On the legs, with most keratinization, urea was superior.Trial registry: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02978209?cond=Ichthyosis+Vulgaris&draw=1&rank=2.

Conflict of interest statement

Uffe Koppelhus and DermaPharm A/S are collaborating on the cosmetics brand MDerma.

© 2021 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient recruitment

References

    1. Bolognia J, Schaffer JV, Cerroni L. In Dermatology Ch. 57. Elsevier; 2018. p. 888–923.
    1. Brown SJ, McLean WH. One remarkable molecule: filaggrin. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:751–62. 10.1038/jid.2011.393
    1. Traupe H, Fischer J, Oji V. Nonsyndromic types of ichthyoses ‐ an update. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology: JDDG. 2014;12:109–21. 10.1111/ddg.12229
    1. Friedman AJ, von Grote EC, Meckfessel MH. Urea: A clinically oriented overview from bench to bedside. J Drugs Dermatol: JDD. 2016;15:633–9.
    1. Hoppe T, Winge MC, Bradley M, Nordenskjöld M, Vahlquist A, Törmä H, et al. Moisturizing treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and ichtyosis vulgaris improves dry skin but has a modest effect of gene expression regardless FLG genotype. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2015;29:174–7. 10.1111/jdv.12333
    1. Pan M, Heinecke G, Bernardo S, Tsui C, Levitt J. Urea: a comprehensive review of the clinical literature. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:20392.
    1. Kuster W, Bohnsack K, Rippke F, Upmeyer H.‐J, Groll S, Traupe H. Efficacy of urea therapy in children with ichthyosis. A multicenter randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, semilateral study. Dermatology. 1998;196:217–22. 10.1159/000017902
    1. Tadini G, Giustini S, Milani M. Efficacy of topical 10% urea‐based lotion in patients with ichthyosis vulgaris: a two‐center, randomized, controlled, single‐blind, right‐vs.‐left study in comparison with standard glycerol‐based emollient cream. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:2279–84. 10.1185/03007995.2011.628381
    1. Randomizer Research . 2018.
    1. Serup, J . EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Tech: off Journal International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). 1995;1, 109‐14, 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1995.tb00029.x
    1. Klimakamrene, , (2018).
    1. Berardesca E, Loden M, Serup J, Masson P, Rodrigues LM. The revised EEMCO guidance for the in vivo measurement of water in the skin. Skin Res Tech: Off J International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI). 2018;24:351–8. 10.1111/srt.12599
    1. Antonov D, Schliemann S, Elsner P. Methods for the assessment of barrier function. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:61–70. 10.1159/000441546
    1. Kottner J, Lichterfeld A, Blume‐Peytavi U. Transepidermal water loss in young and aged healthy humans: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2013;305:315–23. 10.1007/s00403-012-1313-6
    1. Tagami H. Electrical measurement of the hydration state of the skin surface in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171 (Suppl 3):29–33. 10.1111/bjd.13245
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)‐‐a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42:377–81. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
    1. Vahlquist A, Fischer J, Torma H. Inherited nonsyndromic ichthyoses: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:51–66. 10.1007/s40257-017-0313-x

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj