Childhood cancer and agricultural pesticide use: an ecologic study in California

Peggy Reynolds, Julie Von Behren, Robert B Gunier, Debbie E Goldberg, Andrew Hertz, Martha E Harnly, Peggy Reynolds, Julie Von Behren, Robert B Gunier, Debbie E Goldberg, Andrew Hertz, Martha E Harnly

Abstract

We analyzed population-based childhood cancer incidence rates throughout California in relation to agricultural pesticide use. During 1988-1994, a total of 7,143 cases of invasive cancer were diagnosed among children under 15 years of age in California. Building on the availability of high-quality population-based cancer incidence information from the California Cancer Registry, population data from the U.S. Census, and uniquely comprehensive agricultural pesticide use information from California's Department of Pesticide Regulation, we used a geographic information system to assign summary population, exposure, and outcome attributes at the block group level. We used Poisson regression to estimate rate ratios (RRs) by pesticide use density adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, and sex for all types of childhood cancer combined and separately for the leukemias and central nervous system cancers. We generally found no association between pesticide use density and childhood cancer incidence rates. The RR for all cancers was 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80-1.13] for block groups in the 90th percentile and above for use of pesticides classified as probable carcinogens, compared to the block groups with use of < 1 lb/mi(2). The RRs were similar for leukemia and central nervous system cancers. Childhood leukemia rates were significantly elevated (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03-2.13) in block groups with the highest use of propargite, although we saw no dose-response trend with increasing exposure categories. Results were unchanged by further adjustment for socioeconomic status and urbanization.

References

    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Jun;106 Suppl 3:893-908
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109(10):1071-8
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Mar;107(3):205-11
    1. Epidemiology. 2001 Mar;12(2):148-56
    1. Vet Hum Toxicol. 2000 Jun;42(3):129-32
    1. Cancer Res. 1989 Jul 15;49(14):4030-7
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108 Suppl 3:573-94
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Oct;105(10):1068-77
    1. Arch Environ Health. 1998 Nov-Dec;53(6):410-3
    1. Br J Cancer. 1991 Mar;63(3):333-6
    1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jan;26(1):37-46
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105(12):1344-53
    1. J Org Chem. 1997 Feb 7;62(3):523-529
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Mar;35(1):11-5
    1. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):249-52
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1994;16(2):243-72
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):216-24
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jul;79(1):39-46
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr 1;151(7):639-46; discussion 647-50
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108(6):515-20
    1. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1997 Apr-Jun;7(2):217-34
    1. Br Med J. 1958 Jun 28;1(5086):1495-508
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Dec;103(12):1126-34
    1. Int J Cancer. 1996 Jan 3;65(1):39-50
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1996 Oct;32A(11):1943-8
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Nov;105(11):1222-7
    1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jan;26(1):47-59
    1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Jan;24(1):87-92
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Nov;105(11):1214-20
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107 Suppl 3:409-19
    1. Stat Med. 1996 Apr 15-May 15;15(7-9):683-97
    1. Cancer Res. 1988 Sep 15;48(18):5358-62

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj