Breastfeeding and the risk of childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis

Marilyn L Kwan, Patricia A Buffler, Barbara Abrams, Vincent A Kiley, Marilyn L Kwan, Patricia A Buffler, Barbara Abrams, Vincent A Kiley

Abstract

Objective: The authors used a meta-analytic technique to (1) quantify the evidence of an association between duration of breastfeeding and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), (2) assess the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on any such associations, and (3) discuss the implications of these findings for the evaluation of whether breastfeeding reduces the risk of childhood leukemia.

Methods: A fixed effects model was employed to systematically combine the results of 14 case-control studies addressing the effect of short-term (< or = 6 months) and long-term (>6 months) breastfeeding on the risk of childhood ALL and/or AML. Subgroup analyses of studies that did and did not adjust for SES were also performed.

Results: A significant, negative association was observed between long-term breastfeeding and both ALL risk (odds ratio [OR]=0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68, 0.84) and AML risk (OR=0.85; 95% CI 0.73, 0.98). Short-term breastfeeding was similarly protective for ALL and AML. Results for studies that adjusted and did not adjust for SES were not significantly different from the results for the 14 studies combined.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that both short-term and long-term breastfeeding reduced the risk of childhood ALL and AML, suggesting that the protective effect of breastfeeding might not be limited to ALL as earlier hypothesized. Potential bias introduced by different participation rates for case and control samples that differed in SES can be minimized by implementing larger case-control studies with SES-matched, population-based controls.

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Oct 20;91(20):1765-72
    1. Br J Cancer. 1999 Aug;80(11):1844-51
    1. Int J Cancer. 1999 Dec 10;83(6):712-7
    1. Eur J Cancer. 1999 Dec;35(14):1941-53
    1. Br J Cancer. 2000 Dec;83(11):1559-64
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec 15;152(12):1136-44
    1. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Jan;37(2):234-8
    1. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;48(1):125-41, ix
    1. JAMA. 2001 Jan 24-31;285(4):413-20
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 Mar;55(3):179-85
    1. Br J Cancer. 2002 Feb 1;86(3):356-61
    1. Br J Cancer. 2002 Apr 8;86(7):1064-9
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 2002 Apr;161(4):235-7
    1. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1107-10
    1. Br J Cancer. 2003 Apr 7;88(7):1035-7
    1. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 12;90(1):139-45
    1. Pediatrics. 1985 Dec;76(6):1004-8
    1. Am J Med. 1986 May 30;80(5C):85-95
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Oct;124(4):590-4
    1. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1987 Mar;62(3):279-87
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:1-30
    1. Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):365-8
    1. Lancet. 1988 Oct 1;2(8614):796-7
    1. Lancet. 1988 Nov 12;2(8620):1136
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988 Sep;42(3):235-42
    1. Br J Cancer. 1990 Aug;62(2):304-8
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;132(3):572-5
    1. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1991;19(2):115-21
    1. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Aug;12(8):664-71
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Nov;50(11):971-97
    1. Indian Pediatr. 1993 May;30(5):651-7
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Nov 16;86(22):1678-80
    1. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):27-32
    1. Ann Epidemiol. 1995 May;5(3):245-9
    1. Epidemiology. 1996 Jan;7(1):87-92
    1. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Sep;96(9):885-90
    1. Br J Cancer. 1997;76(9):1241-7
    1. Biol Neonate. 1998;74(2):177-91
    1. Klin Padiatr. 1998 Jul-Aug;210(4):185-91
    1. Int J Cancer Suppl. 1998;11:29-33
    1. Acta Paediatr. 1999 Apr;88(4):416-21
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jun 16;91(12):1051-8
    1. Br J Cancer. 1999 May;80(3-4):585-90
    1. Br J Cancer. 1999 Jul;80(9):1483-9
    1. East Afr Med J. 1999 Jan;76(1):3-9
    1. Lancet. 1999 Oct 30;354(9189):1499-503

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj