Quality-of-life evaluation for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison between vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens in a randomized trial: Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00-03 (BRI LC03-01)

Masaaki Kawahara, Harue Tada, Akihiro Tokoro, Satoshi Teramukai, Hideki Origasa, Kaoru Kubota, Tetsu Shinkai, Masanori Fukushima, Kiyoyuki Furuse, Masaaki Kawahara, Harue Tada, Akihiro Tokoro, Satoshi Teramukai, Hideki Origasa, Kaoru Kubota, Tetsu Shinkai, Masanori Fukushima, Kiyoyuki Furuse

Abstract

Background: A randomized trial of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel (VGD) versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer showed no difference in overall survival (median survival time: 13.6 versus 14.1 months) between the two treatment groups. We report here the results of quality-of-life (QOL) study initiated in the mid-course of this randomized trial.

Methods: The patients themselves assessed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Lung (FACT-L), FACT-Taxane and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spirituality (FACIT-Sp) QOL instruments at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 weeks after the treatment. The primary endpoint was a comparison of total QOL score for each assessment instrument between the two groups.

Results: Sixty-eight patients from the trial (VGD, 34; PC, 34) who submitted baseline questionnaires and at least one questionnaire over the course of treatment were eligible. Longitudinal analysis showed a significant difference in slope of the FACT-Taxane score (p = 0.004) between treatment regimens over time, but no difference was found in FACT-L score (p = 0.311) and FACIT-Sp score (p = 0.466) between the two groups.

Conclusions: The significant difference in slope of FACT-Taxane score favored the VGD regimen. These data should be considered in treatment decision-making for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Trial registration: NCT00242983.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in FACT-L score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in FACT-Taxane score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in FACIT-Sp score.

References

    1. Natale RB. Experience with new chemotherapeutic agents in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 1998;113:32S–39S. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1_Supplement.32S.
    1. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary Cl, (editors) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2002.
    1. Bunn PA Jr, Vokes EE, Langer CJ, Schiller JH. An update on North American randomized studies in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 1998;25:S2–S10.
    1. Bulzebruck H, Bopp R, Drings P, Bauer E, Krysa S, Probst G, van Kaick G, Muller KM, Vogt-Moykopf I. New aspects in staging of lung cancer. Prospective validation of the International Union Against Cancer TNM classification. Cancer. 1992;70:1102–1110. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:5<1102::AID-CNCR2820700514>;2-5.
    1. Thongprasert S, Sanguanmitra P, Juthapan W, Clinch J. Relationship between quality of life and clinical outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC plus chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 1999;24:17–24. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00017-3.
    1. Johnson DH. Evolution of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a hospital perspective and the eastern cooperative oncology group experience. Chest. 2000;117:133S–137S. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.4_suppl_1.133S.
    1. Bahl A, Falk S. Meta-analysis of single agents in the chemotherapy of NSCLC: what do we want to know? Br J Cancer. 2001;84:1143–1145. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1740.
    1. Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Girling DJ. Defining and analysing symptom palliation in cancer clinical trials: a deceptively difficult exercise. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:538–544. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690085.
    1. Hopwood P, Stephens RJ. Symptoms at presentation for treatment in patients with lung cancer: implications for the evolution of palliative treatment. The Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:633–636. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.124.
    1. Kubota K, Kawahara M, Ogawara M, Nishiwaki Y, Komuta K, Minato K, Fujita Y, Teramukai S, Fukushima M, Furuse K. Japan Multi-National Trial Organisation. Vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxcel versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:1135–1142. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70261-4.
    1. Cella DF, Bonomi AE, Lloyd SR, Tulsky DS, Kaplan E, Bonomi P. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer. 1995;12:199–220. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00450-F.
    1. Cella D, Peternan A, Hudgens S, Webster K, Socinski MA. Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology. The functional assessment of cancer therapy-taxane (FACT-Taxane) Cancer. 2003;98:822–831. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11578.
    1. Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hermandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp) Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:49–58. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.
    1. Noguchi W, Ohno T, Morita S, Aihara O, Tsujii H, Shimozuma K, Matsushima E. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp) for Japanese patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:240–245. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0582-1.
    1. FACIT,org.
    1. Yang P. Epidemiology of lung cancer prognosis: quantity and quality of life. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;471:469–486. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_24.
    1. Herndon JE, Fleishman S, Kosty MP, Green MR. A longitudinal study of quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8931. Control Clin Trials. 1997;18:286–300. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(96)00116-X.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj