Quality of obstetric care in public-sector facilities and constraints to implementing emergency obstetric care services: evidence from high- and low-performing districts of Bangladesh

Iqbal Anwar, Nahid Kalim, Marge Koblinsky, Iqbal Anwar, Nahid Kalim, Marge Koblinsky

Abstract

This study explored the quality of obstetric care in public-sector facilities and the constraints to programming comprehensive essential obstetric care (EOC) services in rural areas of Khulna and Sylhet divisions, relatively high- and low-performing areas of Bangladesh respectively. Quality was explored by physically inspecting all public-sector EOC facilities and the constraints through in-depth interviews with public-sector programme managers and service providers. Distribution of the functional EOC facilities satisfied the United Nation's minimum criteria of at least one comprehensive EOC and four basic EOC facilities for every 500,000 people in Khulna but not in Sylhet region. Human-resource constraints were the major barrier for maternal health. Sanctioned posts for nurses were inadequate in rural areas of both the divisions; however, deployment and retention of trained human resources were more problematic in rural areas of Sylhet. Other problems also plagued care, including unavailability of blood in rural settings and lack of use of evidence-based techniques. The overall quality of care was better in the EOC facilities of Khulna division than in Sylhet. 'Context' of care was also different in these two areas: the population in Sylhet is less literate, more conservative, and faces more geographical and sociocultural barriers in accessing services. As a consequence of both care delivered and the context, more normal vaginal and caesarian-section deliveries were carried out in the public-sector EOC facilities in the Khulna region, with the exception of the medical college hospitals. To improve maternal healthcare, there is a need for a human-resource plan that increases the number of posts in rural areas and ensures availability. All categories of maternal healthcare providers also need training on evidence-based techniques. While the centralized push system of management has its strengths, special strategies for improving the response in the low-performing areas is urgently warranted.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Map of Bangladesh showing study districts
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Concentration of functioning EOC facilities for maternal health in high- and low- performing districts, 2005-2007
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Availability of public-sector doctors and nurses in rural areas: concentration per 1,000 people in high- and low-performing urban and rural areas, 2005
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Availability of public nurses and doctors in urban areas: concentration per 1,000 people in high- and low-performing districts, 2005
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Practice of evidence-based techniques for maternal health in study area
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Median number of deliveries conducted in the last month in different types of EOC facilities by study districts, 2006-2007
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Number of caesarean sections conducted in different public-sector comprehensive EOC facilities in the last month in high-and low-performing districts of Bangladesh, 2005
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Summary quality score at different EOC facilities by study area

References

    1. National Institute of Population Research and Training. Bangladesh maternal health services and maternal mortality survey 2001. Dhaka: National Institute of Population Research and Training; 2003. p. 234 p.
    1. World Health Organization. Everybody's business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. p. 44 p..
    1. Penn-Kekana L, McPake B, Parkhurst J. Improving maternal health: getting what works to happen. Reprod Health Matt. 2007;15:28–37.
    1. Freedman LP, Graham WJ, Brazier E, Smith JF, Ensort T, Faureau V, et al. Practical lessons from global safe motherhood initiatives: time for a new focus on implementation. Lancet. 2007;370:1383–91.
    1. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Social Sci Med. 2000;51:1611–25.
    1. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science. 1978;200:856–64.
    1. Chakraborty N, Islam MA, Chowdhury RI, Bari W, Akhter HH. Determinants of the use of maternal health services in rural Bangladesh. Health Promot Int. 2003;18:327–37.
    1. Kalim N, Anwar I, Khan J, Blum LS, Moran AC, Botlero R, et al. Postpartum haemorrhage and eclampsia: differences in knowledge and care-seeking behaviour in two districts of Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:156–69.
    1. Bangladesh. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Health and Population Sector Programme 1998-2003: programme implementation plan. Dhaka: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Bangladesh; 1998. p. 121 p..
    1. Chowdhury ME, Ahmed A, Kalim N, Koblinsky M. Causes of maternal mortality decline in Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:108–23.
    1. Campbell OM, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series Steering Group Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284–99.
    1. United Nations Children's Fund. Guidelines for monitoring the availability and use of obstetric services. New York, NY: United Nations Children's Fund; 1997. p. 102 p..
    1. Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data–or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001;38:115–32.
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2005. Make every mother and child count. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. p. 219 p..
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2006: working together for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 209 p..
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2000—health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. p. 215 p..
    1. Gruen R, Anwar R, Begum T, Killingsworth JR, Normand C. Dual job holding practitioners in Bangladesh: an exploration. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:267–79.
    1. Parkhurst JO, Penn-Kekana L, Blaauw B, Balabanova D, Danishevski K, Rahman SA, et al. Health systems factors influencing maternal health services: a four-country comparison. Health Policy. 2005;73:127–38.
    1. Hadley MB, Blum LS, Mujaddid S, Parveen S, Nuremowla S, Haque ME, et al. Why Bangladeshi nurses avoid ‘nursing': social and structural factors in hospital wards in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1166–77.
    1. Hadley MB, Roques A. Nursing in Bangladesh: rhetoric and reality. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1153–65.
    1. Millennium Development Goals needs assessments: country case studies of Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ghana, Tanzania and Uganda. New York, NY: Millennium Project; 2004. p. 225 p.. ( , accessed on 11 May 2008).
    1. Anand S, Bärnighausen T. Human resources and health outcomes: cross-country econometric study. Lancet. 2004;364:1603–9.
    1. Lehmann U, Dieleman M, Martineau T. Staffing remote rural areas in middle- and low-income countries: a literature review of attraction and retention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:19.
    1. Bhat R, Mavalankar DV, Singh PV, Singh N. Maternal healthcare financing: Gujarat's Chiranjeevi Scheme and its beneficiaries. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:249–58.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj