A phase IIA randomized clinical trial of a multiclade HIV-1 DNA prime followed by a multiclade rAd5 HIV-1 vaccine boost in healthy adults (HVTN204)

Gavin J Churchyard, Cecilia Morgan, Elizabeth Adams, John Hural, Barney S Graham, Zoe Moodie, Doug Grove, Glenda Gray, Linda-Gail Bekker, M Juliana McElrath, Georgia D Tomaras, Paul Goepfert, Spyros Kalams, Lindsey R Baden, Michelle Lally, Raphael Dolin, William Blattner, Artur Kalichman, J Peter Figueroa, Jean Pape, Mauro Schechter, Olivier Defawe, Stephen C De Rosa, David C Montefiori, Gary J Nabel, Lawrence Corey, Michael C Keefer, NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network, Gavin J Churchyard, Cecilia Morgan, Elizabeth Adams, John Hural, Barney S Graham, Zoe Moodie, Doug Grove, Glenda Gray, Linda-Gail Bekker, M Juliana McElrath, Georgia D Tomaras, Paul Goepfert, Spyros Kalams, Lindsey R Baden, Michelle Lally, Raphael Dolin, William Blattner, Artur Kalichman, J Peter Figueroa, Jean Pape, Mauro Schechter, Olivier Defawe, Stephen C De Rosa, David C Montefiori, Gary J Nabel, Lawrence Corey, Michael C Keefer, NIAID HIV Vaccine Trials Network

Abstract

Background: The safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine regimen consisting of a 6-plasmid HIV-1 DNA prime (envA, envB, envC, gagB, polB, nefB) boosted by a recombinant adenovirus serotype-5 (rAd5) HIV-1 with matching inserts was evaluated in HIV-seronegative participants from South Africa, United States, Latin America and the Caribbean.

Methods: 480 participants were evenly randomized to receive either: DNA (4 mg i.m. by Biojector) at 0, 1 and 2 months, followed by rAd5 (10(10) PU i.m. by needle/syringe) at 6 months; or placebo. Participants were monitored for reactogenicity and adverse events throughout the 12-month study. Peak and duration of HIV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated after the prime and boost.

Results: The vaccine was well tolerated and safe. T-cell responses, detected by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) ELISpot to global potential T-cell epitopes (PTEs) were observed in 70.8% (136/192) of vaccine recipients overall, most frequently to Gag (54.7%) and to Env (54.2%). In U.S. vaccine recipients T-cell responses were less frequent in Ad5 sero-positive versus sero-negative vaccine recipients (62.5% versus 85.7% respectively, p = 0.035). The frequency of HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses detected by intracellular cytokine staining were similar (41.8% and 47.2% respectively) and most secreted ≥2 cytokines. The vaccine induced a high frequency (83.7%-94.6%) of binding antibody responses to consensus Group M, and Clades A, B and C gp140 Env oligomers. Antibody responses to Gag were elicited in 46% of vaccine recipients.

Conclusion: The vaccine regimen was well-tolerated and induced polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and multi-clade anti-Env binding antibodies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00125970.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Dr. Nabel is named on patent applications for the DNA and adenovirus vector components of this vaccine concept (patents # E-173-2004/0-US-01, E-355-2003/0-US-01, and E-267-2004/0). This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors. None of the other authors have financial, personal, or professional interests that could be construed to have influenced the paper.

Figures

Figure 1. Number of individuals enrolled, randomized…
Figure 1. Number of individuals enrolled, randomized to vaccine or placebo, followed-up and analyzed.
ICS = Intracellular cytokine staining, Ad5 = Adenovirus serotype 5.
Figure 2. Maximal local and systemic reactogenicity…
Figure 2. Maximal local and systemic reactogenicity after each vaccination.
Frequency of local (A) and systemic (B) reactions occurring within three days following each DNA and rAd5 vaccination. Local injection site reactions included pain, tenderness, erythema and induration. Systemic reactions included malaise/fatigue, headache, chills, myalgia, arthralgia or increased body temperature. P = Placebo, V = Vaccine.
Figure 3. Magnitude of T-cell responses recognizing…
Figure 3. Magnitude of T-cell responses recognizing global PTEs 6 weeks after the Ad5 boost in all participants and by Ad5 titer in US participants.
Shown are the magnitude of T-cell responses as measured by IFN-γ ELISpot responses (A) and percentage of CD4+ (B) and CD8+ (C) T-cells producing interferon-γ and/or interleukin-2 in response to Env, Gag, Pol or Nef six weeks after rAd5 boost in all participants (left) and in United States participants stratified by adenovirus serotype-5 titer (

Figure 4. Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell…

Figure 4. Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL2 cytokine responses.

The left…

Figure 4. Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL2 cytokine responses.
The left graphs show the percentage of the HIV-specific CD4+ (upper panel) or CD8+ (lower panel) T-cells that are producing one, two or three cytokines in the vaccine recipients. Intracellular cytokine staining analyses were done on PBMC obtained six weeks after the rAd5 boost. The right graphs depict the percentage of cells producing interferon-γ, interleukin-2 or tumor necrosis factor-α in those cells producing one cytokine (middle panels), and the percentage of cells co-producing two cytokines (panels on the right). The boxplots show the distribution of responses in positive responders only. The box indicated the median and inter-quartile range; whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range from the upper or lower quartile.

Figure 5. Magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+…

Figure 5. Magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell ICS responses to empty Ad5 vector.

Figure 5. Magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell ICS responses to empty Ad5 vector.
Percentage of CD4+ (top panels) and CD8+ T cells (bottom panels) producing interferon-γ and/or interleukin 2, or both, by intracellular cytokine staining, in response to Ad5 empty vector stimulation in all (left panels) or US only (right panels) placebo and vaccine recipients 6 weeks after the Ad5 boost. Positive responders are shown in red and negative responders in blue. The box plots and numbers above the graphs are as in Figure 2.

Figure 6. Neutralizing antibody responses to Tier…

Figure 6. Neutralizing antibody responses to Tier 1 viruses.

Positive responders are shown in red…

Figure 6. Neutralizing antibody responses to Tier 1 viruses.
Positive responders are shown in red and negative responders in blue. The boxplots show the distribution of responses in positive responders only. The box indicates the median and inter-quartile range; whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range from the upper or lower quartile.
Figure 4. Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell…
Figure 4. Polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL2 cytokine responses.
The left graphs show the percentage of the HIV-specific CD4+ (upper panel) or CD8+ (lower panel) T-cells that are producing one, two or three cytokines in the vaccine recipients. Intracellular cytokine staining analyses were done on PBMC obtained six weeks after the rAd5 boost. The right graphs depict the percentage of cells producing interferon-γ, interleukin-2 or tumor necrosis factor-α in those cells producing one cytokine (middle panels), and the percentage of cells co-producing two cytokines (panels on the right). The boxplots show the distribution of responses in positive responders only. The box indicated the median and inter-quartile range; whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range from the upper or lower quartile.
Figure 5. Magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+…
Figure 5. Magnitude of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell ICS responses to empty Ad5 vector.
Percentage of CD4+ (top panels) and CD8+ T cells (bottom panels) producing interferon-γ and/or interleukin 2, or both, by intracellular cytokine staining, in response to Ad5 empty vector stimulation in all (left panels) or US only (right panels) placebo and vaccine recipients 6 weeks after the Ad5 boost. Positive responders are shown in red and negative responders in blue. The box plots and numbers above the graphs are as in Figure 2.
Figure 6. Neutralizing antibody responses to Tier…
Figure 6. Neutralizing antibody responses to Tier 1 viruses.
Positive responders are shown in red and negative responders in blue. The boxplots show the distribution of responses in positive responders only. The box indicates the median and inter-quartile range; whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range from the upper or lower quartile.

References

    1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2009 AIDS epidemic update. 2009. Available: .
    1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J, et al. Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2209–20.
    1. Korber B, Gaschen B, Yusim K, Thakallapally R, Kesmir C, et al. Evolutionary and immunological implications of contemporary HIV-1 variation. Br Med Bull. 2001;58:19–42.
    1. Catanzaro AT, Koup RA, Roederer M, Bailer RT, Enama ME, et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity evaluation of a multiclade HIV-1 candidate vaccine delivered by a replication-defective recombinant adenovirus vector. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1638–1649.
    1. Catanzaro AT, Roederer M, Koup RA, Bailer RT, Enama ME, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of a six-plasmid multiclade HIV-1 DNA candidate vaccine. Vaccine. 2007;25:4085–4092.
    1. Eller MA, Eller LA, Opollo MS, Ouma BJ, Oballah PO, et al. Induction of HIV-specific functional immune responses by a multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine candidate in healthy Ugandans. Vaccine. 2007;25:7737–7742.
    1. Graham BS, Koup RA, Roederer M, Bailer RT, Enama ME, et al. Phase 1 safety and immunogenicity evaluation of a multiclade HIV-1 DNA candidate vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1650–1660.
    1. Koup RA, Roederer M, Lamoreaux L, Fischer J, Novik L, et al. Priming immunization with DNA augments immunogenicity of recombinant adenoviral vectors for both HIV-1 specific antibody and T-cell responses. PLOS One. 2010;5:e9015.
    1. Letvin NL, Mascola JR, Sun Y, Gorgone DA, Buzby AP, et al. Preserved CD4+ central memory T cells and survival in vaccinated SIV-challenged monkeys. Science. 2006;312:1530–1533.
    1. Mattapallil JJ, Douek DC, Buckler-White A, Montefiori D, Letvin NL, et al. Vaccination preserves CD4 memory T cells during acute simian immunodeficiency virus challenge. J Exp Med. 2006;203:1533–1541.
    1. Kibuuka H, Kimutai R, Maboko L, Sawe F, Schunk MS, et al. A phase 1/2 study of a multiclade HIV-1 DNA plasmid prime and recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 boost vaccine in HIV-Uninfected East Africans (RV 172). J Infect Dis. 2010;201:600–607.
    1. Jaoko W, Karita E, Kayitenkore K, Omosa G, Allen S, et al. Safety and immunogenicity study of multiclade HIV-1 adenoviral vector vaccine alone or as boost following a multiclade HIV-1 DNA vaccine in Africa. PLOS One PLoS One. 2010;5:e12873.
    1. McElrath MJ, De Rosa SC, Moodie Z, Dubey S, Kierstead L, et al. HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept Step Study: a case-cohort analysis. Lancet. 2008;372:1894–1905.
    1. Li F, Malhotra U, Gilbert PB, Hawkins NR, Duerr AC, et al. Peptide selection for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 CTL-based vaccine evaluation. Vaccine. 2006;24:6893–6904.
    1. Bull M, Lee D, Stucky J, Chiu YL, Rubin A, et al. Defining blood processing parameters for optimal detection of cryopreserved antigen-specific responses for HIV vaccine trials. J Immunol Methods. 2007;322:57–69.
    1. Horton H, Thomas EP, Stucky JA, Frank I, Moodie Z, et al. Optimization and validation of an 8-color intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay to quantify antigen-specific T cells induced by vaccination. J Immunol Methods. 2007;323:39–54.
    1. Goepfert PA, Tomaras GD, Horton H, Montefiori D, Ferrari G, et al. Durable HIV-1 antibody and T-cell responses elicited by an adjuvanted multi-protein recombinant vaccine in uninfected human volunteers. Vaccine. 2007;25:510–518.
    1. Tomaras GD, Yates NL, Liu P, Qin L, Fouda GG, et al. Initial B-cell responses to transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1: virion-binding immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies followed by plasma anti-gp41 antibodies with ineffective control of initial viremia. J Virol. 2008;82:12449–12463.
    1. Mascola JR, Souza D, Gilbert P, Hahn BH, Haigwood NL, et al. Recommendations for the design and use of standard virus panels to assess neutralizing antibody responses elicited by candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccines. J Virol. 2005;79:10103–10107.
    1. Polonis VR, Brown BK, Rosa BA, Zolla-Pazner S, Dimitrov DS, et al. Recent advances in the characterization of HIV-1 neutralization assays for standardized evaluation of the antibody response to infection and vaccination. Virology. 2008;375:315–320.
    1. Moodie Z, Price L, Gouttefangeas C, Mander A, Janetzki S, et al. Response definition criteria for ELISPOT assays revisited. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1489–1501.
    1. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than exact for interval estimation of binomial parameters. Am Stat. 1998;52:199–226.
    1. Flynn NM, Forthal DN, Harro CD, Judson FN, Mayer KH, et al. Placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:654–665.
    1. Pitisuttithum P, Gilbert P, Gurwith M, Heyward W, Martin M, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of a bivalent recombinant glycoprotein 120 HIV-1 vaccine among injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:1661–1671.
    1. Fitzgerald DW, Janes H, Robertson M, Coombs R, Frank I, et al. An Ad5-vectored HIV-1 vaccine elicits cell-mediated immunity but does not affect disease progression in HIV-1-infected male subjects: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial (the Step study). J Infect Dis. 2011;203:765–772.
    1. Rolland M, Tovanabutra S, Decamp AC, Frahm N, Gilbert PB, et al. Genetic impact of vaccination on breakthrough HIV-1 sequences from the STEP trial. Nat Med. 2011;17:366–371.
    1. Seaman MS, Xu L, Beaudry K, Martin KL, Beddall MH, et al. Multiclade human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope immunogens elicit broad cellular and humoral immunity in rhesus monkeys. J Virol. 2005;79:2956–2963.
    1. Mast TC, Kierstead L, Gupta SB, Nikas AA, Kallas EG, et al. International epidemiology of human pre-existing adenovirus (Ad) type-5, type-6, type-26 and type-36 neutralizing antibodies: correlates of high Ad5 titers and implications for potential HIV vaccine trials. Vaccine. 2010;28:950–957.
    1. Cheng C, Gall JG, Nason M, King CR, Koup RA, et al. Differential specificity and immunogenicity of adenovirus type 5 neutralizing antibodies elicited by natural infection or immunization. J Virol. 2010;84:630–638.
    1. Freel SA, Lamoreaux L, Chattopadhyay PK, Saunders K, Zarkowsky D, et al. Phenotypic and functional profile of HIV-inhibitory CD8 T cells elicited by natural infection and heterologous prime/boost vaccination. J Virol. 2010;84:4998–5006.
    1. Spentzou A, Bergin P, Gill D, Cheeseman H, Ashraf A, et al. Viral inhibition assay: a CD8 T cell neutralization assay for use in clinical trials of HIV-1 vaccine candidates. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:720–729.
    1. Letvin NL, Rao SS, Montefiori DC, Seaman MS, Sun Y, et al. Immune and Genetic Correlates of Vaccine Protection Against Mucosal Infection by SIV in Monkeys. Sci Transl Med. 2011;4;3:81ra36.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj