An assessment of meaning in life-threatening illness: development of the Healing Experience in All Life Stressors (HEALS)

Danetta Hendricks Sloan, Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc, Tiffany Kichline, Karen Baker, Jean-Paul Pinzon, Christina Tafe, Lingsheng Li, M Jennifer Cheng, Ann Berger, Danetta Hendricks Sloan, Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc, Tiffany Kichline, Karen Baker, Jean-Paul Pinzon, Christina Tafe, Lingsheng Li, M Jennifer Cheng, Ann Berger

Abstract

Context: Patients with life-threatening or chronic illness report an experience of increased positive psychological, social, and/or spiritual change during diagnosis and/or treatment of their illness, even in the face of unfavorable prognosis. This transformation begins through the ability to make their life meaningful by forming meaningful connections that emerge through self-introspection and relationships with a divine entity, nature, and other people. The Healing Experience in All Life Stressors (HEALS) assessment provides a way to identify distress-causing changes that may interfere with the development of meaning and psycho-social-spiritual homeostasis.

Objective: Preliminary examination of responses to items on the HEALS and examination of the factor structure.

Method: The 48-item HEALS questionnaire was developed using a multistep process: literature review for concept development, item generation from qualitative data, and face and content validity by expert panel. In the current study, HEALS was completed by 100 patients diagnosed with life-limiting disease and seen by the palliative care team at a large research institution in the US. Exploratory factor analysis techniques were used to determine scale structure of the instrument.

Results: Outcome testing of sample adequacy using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic was 0.75, which exceeds the recommended value of 0.60. The HEALS show very good internal consistency with a Cronbach's a of 0.94. Overall results of the exploratory factor analysis established a four-factor questionnaire: 1) religion; 2) spirituality, demonstrated by a) interaction with a religious community and b) belief in higher power; 3) intrapersonal; and 4) interpersonal relationships expressed through psychological changes resulting in enhanced outlook and improvement in relationships with family and friends.

Conclusion: This study involved the initial step to commence the process of scale validation, with promising outcomes identifying subscales as an effective way to assess the construct of healing. These findings support further examination using cognitive appraisal and confirmatory factor analysis.

Keywords: instrumentation; palliative care; psycho-social spiritual assessment; validation.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Andrykowski M, Lykins E, Floyd A. Psychological health in cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008;24(3):193–201.
    1. Folkman S. Stress, coping, and hope. Psychooncology. 2010;19(9):901–908.
    1. Hefferon K, Grealy M, Mutrie N. Post-traumatic growth and life threatening physical illness: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(pt 2):343–378.
    1. Rutter M. Implications of resilience concepts for scientific understanding. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1094(1):1–12.
    1. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. 2004;15(1):1–18.
    1. Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Tomich PL. A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(5):797–816.
    1. Skeath P, Norris S, Vani K, et al. The nature of life-transforming changes among cancer survivors. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(9):1155–1167.
    1. Johnson J. An overview of psychosocial support services: resources for healing. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23(4):310–313.
    1. Mount B, Boston P, Cohen R. Healing connections: on moving from suffering to a sense of well-being. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;33(4):372–388.
    1. Ingram A. A paradigm shift: healing, quality of life, and a professional choice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(1):198–201.
    1. Mount B. Healing, quality of life, and the need for a paradigm shift in health care. J Palliat Care. 2013;29(1):45–48.
    1. Mount B, Kearney M. Healing in palliative care: charting our way forward. Palliat Med. 2003;17:657–658.
    1. Meza JP, Fahoome GF. The development of an instrument for measuring healing. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(4):355–360.
    1. Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10(1):19–28.
    1. Berger A, editor. Principles and Practice of Palliative Care and Supportive Oncology. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
    1. Salsman J, Fitchett G, Merluzzi T, Sherman A, Parks C. Religion, spirituality, and health outcomes in caner: a case for a meta-analytic investigation. Cancer. 2015;121(21):3754–3759.
    1. Sulmasy D. A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist. 2002;42(si3):24–27.
    1. Center to Advance Palliative Care A Palliative Care Tool Kit and Resource Guide. [Accessed December 28, 2016]. Available from: .
    1. National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative care. 2016. [Accessed May 12, 2016]. Available from: .
    1. Holder G, Young W, Nadarajah S, Berger A. Psychosocial experiences in the context of life threatening illness: the cardiac rehabilitation patient. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(3):1–8.
    1. Young W, Nadarajah S, Skeath P, Berger A. Spirituality in the context of life threatening illness and life transforming change. Palliat Support Care. 2014;13(3):1–8.
    1. Patrick D, Burke L, Gwaltney C, et al. Content validity: establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1 – eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14(8):967–977.
    1. Pett M, Lackey N, Sullivan J. Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis for Instrument Development in Health Care Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
    1. Swisher L, Beckstead J, Bebeau M. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role orientation inventory as an example. Phys Ther. 2004;84(9):784–799.
    1. Kaiser H. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31–36.
    1. Willis G. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2005.
    1. The Pew Center US Public Becoming Less Religious. 2016. [Accessed June, 2016]. Available from:
    1. Kearney M. A Place of Healing: Working with Suffering in Living and Dying. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000.
    1. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as Adopted by the International Health Conference; New York. June 19–22, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2 p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj