Plasticity of central chemoreceptors: effect of bilateral carotid body resection on central CO2 sensitivity

Albert Dahan, Diederik Nieuwenhuijs, Luc Teppema, Albert Dahan, Diederik Nieuwenhuijs, Luc Teppema

Abstract

Background: Human breathing is regulated by feedback and feed-forward control mechanisms, allowing a strict matching between metabolic needs and the uptake of oxygen in the lungs. The most important control mechanism, the metabolic ventilatory control system, is fine-tuned by two sets of chemoreceptors, the peripheral chemoreceptors in the carotid bodies (located in the bifurcation of the common carotid arteries) and the central CO2 chemoreceptors in the ventral medulla. Animal data indicate that resection of the carotid bodies results, apart from the loss of the peripheral chemoreceptors, in reduced activity of the central CO2 sensors. We assessed the acute and chronic effect of carotid body resection in three humans who underwent bilateral carotid body resection (bCBR) after developing carotid body tumors.

Methods and findings: The three patients (two men, one woman) were suffering from a hereditary form of carotid body tumors. They were studied prior to surgery and at regular intervals for 2-4 y following bCBR. We obtained inspired minute ventilation (Vi) responses to hypoxia and CO2. The Vi-CO2 responses were separated into a peripheral (fast) response and a central (slow) response with a two-compartment model of the ventilatory control system. Following surgery the ventilatory CO2 sensitivity of the peripheral chemoreceptors and the hypoxic responses were not different from zero or below 10% of preoperative values. The ventilatory CO2 sensitivity of the central chemoreceptors decreased by about 75% after surgery, with peak reduction occurring between 3 and 6 mo postoperatively. This was followed by a slow return to values close to preoperative values within 2 y. During this slow return, the Vi-CO2 response shifted slowly to the right by about 8 mm Hg.

Conclusions: The reduction in central Vi-CO2 sensitivity after the loss of the carotid bodies suggests that the carotid bodies exert a tonic drive or tonic facilitation on the output of the central chemoreceptors that is lost upon their resection. The observed return of the central CO2 sensitivity is clear evidence for central plasticity within the ventilatory control system. Our data, although of limited sample size, indicate that the response mechanisms of the ventilatory control system are not static but depend on afferent input and exhibit a large degree of restoration or plasticity. In addition, the permanent absence of the breathing response to hypoxia after bCBR may aggravate the pathological consequences of sleep-disordered breathing.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. The Multifrequency Binary Sequence in…
Figure 1. The Multifrequency Binary Sequence in PET co 2
In this study we applied two of the shown (approximately 23.5 min) sequences in succession.
Figure 2. An Example of the Steady-State…
Figure 2. An Example of the Steady-State Ventilatory Response to an Increase in PET co2 from 44 to 50 mm Hg
The response is linear (continuous red line) over the given trajectory; the extrapolated PET co2 (red circles) at which ventilation is zero is given (in this example it is 41.3 mm Hg, open symbol). Resting ventilation and resting PET co2 are also shown (blue circle).
Figure 3. Separation of the Dynamic Ventilatory…
Figure 3. Separation of the Dynamic Ventilatory Response to PET co2
PET co2 is depicted in blue. Shown is separation of measured ventilation (dark yellow) into a fast component with a short delay (ΔTP) originating at the peripheral chemoreceptors (red, time constant of response 3 s), and a slow component with a long delay (ΔTC) originating at the central chemoreceptors (green, time constant of response 120 s).
Figure 4. Resting P ET co 2…
Figure 4. Resting PET co2 Values Observed on Days 1–5 after Bilateral Resection of the Carotid Bodies and Subsequent Days of Testing in Patient 1
The lower PET co2 values on postoperative day 1 may reflect anesthesia- or analgesia-induced lowering of metabolism. The subsequent rise in resting PET co2 is related to the loss of the peripheral chemoreceptors and the effect of this loss on the central chemoreceptors.
Figure 5. The Dynamic Ventilatory Response to…
Figure 5. The Dynamic Ventilatory Response to CO2 in Patient 2
Response was monitored before resection of the carotid bodies (A), 6 mo after bilateral carotid body resection (B), and 1 y after bCBR (C). The applied multifrequency binary sequence is shown on the top of each graph (green; units mm Hg; the dashed lines represent resting PET co2 values). The breath-to-breath ventilation is depicted by the grey dots. The ventilatory response is separated into a slow component originating at the central chemoreceptors (red) and a fast component originating at the peripheral chemoreceptors (blue). The sum of these two components plus a trend term (not shown) and the (parallel) noise corrupting the data, is the yellow line through the measured data points. The analysis shows that 6 mo after resection of the two carotid bodies the peripheral component was not present and the central component initially reduced to about 40% of preoperative values. Six months later, the central component had increased to about 70% of preoperative values. Parameter values are given in Table 2.
Figure 6. Central and Peripheral Chemoreceptor Activity…
Figure 6. Central and Peripheral Chemoreceptor Activity in Response to Stimulation with CO2 in the Three Patients during the Whole Testing Period
In all three patients bCBR caused the loss of the peripheral component or reduction to a value of less than 10% of preoperative values combined with an initial sharp reduction in the magnitude of the central component to about 30% of preoperative values, which was followed by a slow increase to values 85%–95% of the preoperative values. In patient 3 we also obtained data after unilateral carotid body resection.

References

    1. Cunningham DJC, Robbins PA, Wolff CB. Integration of respiratory responses to changes in alveolar partial pressures of CO2 and O2 and in arterial pH. In: Fishman AP, Cherniack NS, Widdicombe JG, editors. Handbook of physiology, section 3, the respiratory system. Bethesda (MD): American Physiological Society; 1986. pp. 475–528.
    1. Knill RL, Gelb AW. Peripheral chemoreceptors during anesthesia: Are the watchdogs sleeping? Anesthesiology. 1982;57:151–152.
    1. Nissenblatt MJ. Cyanotic heart disease: “Low altitude” risk for carotid body tumor? Johns Hopkins Med J. 1978;142:18–21.
    1. Hirsch JH, Killien FC, Troupin RH. Bilateral carotid body tumors and cyanotic heart disease. Am J Radiol. 1980;134:1073–1075.
    1. Herget J, Brown CA, Kutilek S, Barer GR, Palacek F. Enlargement of carotid bodies in rats with lung emphysema or silicosis. Bull Europ Physiopath Respir. 1982;18:75–79.
    1. Pacheco-Ojeda L, Enrique C, Rodriguez C, Vivar N. Carotid body tumors at high altitude: Quito, Ecuador 1987. World J Surg. 1988;12:856–860.
    1. Baysal BE, Myers EN. Etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of carotid body tumors. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;59:256–261.
    1. Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Brozick JE, Lawrence EC, Myssiorek D, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–851.
    1. Fuller DD, Mitchell GS, Bavis RW. Respiratory neuroplasticity: Respiratory gases, development, and spinal injury. In: Ward DS, Dahan A, Teppema LJ, editors. Pharmacology and pathophysiology of the control of breathing. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2005. pp. 155–223.
    1. Pan LG, Forster HV, Martino P, Strecker PJ, Beales J, et al. Important role of the carotid afferents in control of breathing. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:1299–1306.
    1. Lowry TL, Forster HV, Pan LG, Serra A, Wenninger J, et al. Effects on breathing of carotid body denervation in neonatal piglets. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:2128–2135.
    1. Serra A, Brozoski D, Hedin N, Franciosi RA, Forster HV. Mortality after carotid body denervation in rats. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:1298–1306.
    1. Forster HV. Plasticity in the control of breathing following sensory denervation. J Appl Physiol. 2003;94:784–794.
    1. McDonald JW, Becker D, Sadowsky CL, Jane JA, Conturo TE, et al. Late recovery following spinal cord injury: Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:252–265.
    1. Wade JG, Larson CP, Hickey RF, Ehrenfeld WK, Severinghaus JW. Effect of endarteriectomy on carotid chemoreceptor and baroreceptor function in man. N Eng J Med. 1970;282:823–829.
    1. Lugliani R, Whipp BJ, Seard C, Wasserman K. Effect of bilateral carotid body resection on ventilatory control at rest and during exercise in man. N Eng J Med. 1971;285:1105–1111.
    1. Bellville JW, Whipp BJ, Kaufman RD, Swanson GD, Aqleh KA, et al. Central and peripheral chemoreflex loop gain in normal and carotid body-resected subjects. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46:843–853.
    1. Honda Y, Watanabe S, Hashizume I, Satomura N, Hata N, et al. Hypoxic chemosensitivity in asthmatic patients two decades after carotid body resection. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46:632–638.
    1. de Backer W, Vermeire P, Bogaert E, Janssens E, van Maele R. Almitrine has no effect on gas exchange after bilateral carotid body resection in severe chronic airflow obstruction. Bull Europ Physiopathol Respir. 1985;21:427–432.
    1. Dahan A, DeGoede J, Berkenbosch A, Olievier I. The influence of oxygen on the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1990;428:485–499.
    1. Pedersen MEF, Fatemian M, Robbins PA. Identification of fast and slow ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide under hypoxic and hypercapnic conditions in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 1999;521:273–287.
    1. Fatemian M, Nieuwenhuijs DJF, Teppema LJ, Meinesz S, van der Mey AGL, et al. The respiratory response to carbon dioxide in humans with unilateral and bilateral resections of the carotid bodies. J Physiol (Lond) 2003;549:965–973.
    1. Swanson GD, Bellville JW. Step changes in end-tidal CO2: Methods and implications. J Appl Physiol. 1975;39:377–385.
    1. Nieuwenhuijs D, Sarton E, Teppema LJ, Kruyt E, Olievier I, et al. Respiratory sites of action of propofol: Absence of depression of peripheral chemoreflex loop by low-dose propofol. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:889–895.
    1. Smith CA, Rodman JR, Cheneul BJA, Henderson KS, Dempsey JA. Response time and sensitivity of the ventilatory response to CO2 in unanesthetized intact dogs: Central vs. peripheral chemoreceptors. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:13–19.
    1. Ljung L. System identification: Theory for the user. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1987. pp. 169–207.
    1. DeGoede J, Berkenbosch A, Ward DS, Bellville JW, Olievier CN. Comparison of chemoreflex gains obtained with two different methods in cats. J Appl Physiol. 1985;59:170–179.
    1. Dahan A, van den Elsen MJLJ, Berkenbosch A, DeGoede J, Olievier ICW, et al. Effects of subanesthetic halothane on the ventilatory response to hypercapnia and acute hypoxia in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:727–738.
    1. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Multimodal inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc Meth Res. 2004;33:261–304.
    1. Dahan A, Taschner PEM, Jansen JC, van der Mey A, Teppema LJ, et al. Caritid body tumors in humans caused by a mutation in the gene for succinate dehydrogenase D (SDHD) Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;551:71–76.
    1. van den Elsen M, Dahan A, DeGoede J, Berkenbosch A, van Kleef J. Influences of subanesthetic isoflurane on ventilatory control in humans. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:478–490.
    1. van den Elsen M, Sarton E, Teppema L, Berkenbosch A, Dahan A. Influences of 0.1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, desflurane and isoflurane on the dynamic ventilatory response to hypercapnia in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:174–182.
    1. Rodman JR, Curran AK, Henderson KS, Demspey JA, Smith CA. Carotid body denervation in dogs: Eupnea and the ventilatory response to hyperoxic hypercapnia. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:328–335.
    1. Hodges MR, Opansky C, Qian B, Davis S, Bonis JM, et al. Carotid body denervation alters ventilatory responses to ibotenic acid injections or focal acidosis in the medullary raphe. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:1234–1242.
    1. Mulkey DK, Stornetta RL, Weston MC, Simmons JR, Parker A, et al. Respiratory control by ventral surface chemoreceptor neurons in rats. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1360–1369.
    1. Rosin DL, Chang DA, Guyenet PG. Afferent and efferent connections of the rat retrotrapezoid nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 2006;499:64–89.
    1. Mitchell GS. Back to the future: Carbon dioxide chemoreceptors in the mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1288–1290.
    1. Astrom K, Cohen J, Willett J, Aston C, Baysal B. Altitude is a phenotypic modifier in hereditary paraganglioma type 1: Evidence for an oxygen-sensing defect. Hum Genet. 2003;113:228–237.
    1. Eng C, Kiuru M, Fernandez MJ, Aaltonen LA. A role for mitochondrial enzymes in inherited neoplasia and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:193–202.
    1. Piruat JI, Pintado CO, Ortega-Sáenz P, Roche M, López-Barneo J. The mitochondrial SDHD gene is require for early embryogenesis, and its partial deficiency results in persistent carotid body glomus cell activation with full responsivenss to hypoxia. Mol Cel Biol. 2004;24:10933–10940.
    1. Dempsey JA, Smith CA, Przybylowski T, Chenueal B, Xie A, et al. The ventilatory responsiveness to CO2 below eupnoea as a determinant of ventilatory stability in sleep. J Physiol (Lond) 2004;560:1–11.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj