Development, modelling, and pilot testing of a complex intervention to support end-of-life care provided by Danish general practitioners

Anna Kirstine Winthereik, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Anders Bonde Jensen, Peter Vedsted, Anna Kirstine Winthereik, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Anders Bonde Jensen, Peter Vedsted

Abstract

Background: Most patients in end-of-life with life-threatening diseases prefer to be cared for and die at home. Nevertheless, the majority die in hospitals. GPs have a pivotal role in providing end-of-life care at patients' home, and their involvement in the palliative trajectory enhances the patient's possibility to stay at home. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an intervention consisting of continuing medical education (CME) and electronic decision support (EDS) to support end-of-life care in general practice.

Methods: We developed an intervention in line with the first phases of the guidelines for complex interventions drawn up by the Medical Research Council. Phase 1 involved the development of the intervention including identification of key barriers to provision of end-of-life care for GPs and of facilitators of change. Furthermore the actual modelling of two components: CME meeting and EDS. Phase 2 focused on pilot-testing and intervention assessment by process evaluation.

Results: In phase 1 lack of identification of patients at the end of life and limited palliative knowledge among GPs were identified as barriers. The CME meeting and the EDS were developed. The CME meeting was a four-hour educational meeting performed by GPs and specialists in palliative care. The EDS consisted of two parts: a pop-up window for each patient with palliative needs and a list of all patients with palliative needs in the practice. The pilot testing in phase 2 showed that the CME meeting was performed as intended and 120 (14%) of the GPs in the region attended. The EDS was integrated in existing electronic records but was shut down early for external reasons; 50 (5%) GPs signed up. The pilot-testing demonstrated a need to strengthen the implementation as attending rate was low in the current set-up.

Conclusion: We developed a complex intervention to support GPs in providing end-of-life care. The pilot-test showed general acceptance of the CME meetings. The EDS was shut down early and needs further evaluation before examining the whole intervention in a larger study, where evaluation could be based on patient-related outcomes and impact on end-of-life care.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02050256 ) January 30, 2014.

Keywords: COPD; Cancer; Clinical decision support systems; Complex intervention; Continuing medical education; Denmark; End-of-life care; General practice; Palliative care.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

According to the Committee on Health Research Ethics of the Central Denmark Region, the Danish Act on Research Ethics Review of Health Research Projects does not apply to this project (file no. 31/201). The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (J.no. 2013–41-1965) and was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02050256).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The EDS pop-up window generated in the medical records to be filled in by GP. 1: Directly linked to the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL [55] in the palliative guideline [17]: ready to print and hand out to the patient. 2: ECOG Performance Status [56]. * The information is automatically transferred to the palliative list
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The list of all patients with palliative needs in the practice divided into patients with cancer and COPD, respectively. The tab for COPD contains additional information on smoking status, number of exacerbations within the last year and MRC breathlessness score. All information shown in the figure is made up for the figure and not based on real data. CPR number: Personal identification number allocated to every Danish citizen. Diagnosis: The cancer diagnosis (ICD 10). When the cursor marks the diagnosis, it is written in words. Term.decl: Terminal declaration. Data retrieved from the pop-up window. Perf. Status: ECOG performance status [56]. Data retrieved from the pop-up window. C and P diag: Comorbidities and psychiatric comorbidities; a dot means that the patient is registered with comorbidity (written in text when the cursor is dragged to the dot). Data retrieved automatically from the EPR. GP/staff: The patient’s contact GP/staff in the practice(s). Data retrieved from the pop-up window. Specialist care: The patient receives specialist palliative care. Data retrieved from the pop-up window. Latest pop-up window: A marker indicates that a note has been left by the GP/staff in the pop-up window (can be read when the cursor is dragged to the dot)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The distribution (% of responses (n = 115)) of GPs’ self-reported usefulness of attending the CME and the demonstrated tools. Made by the Committee for Quality Improvement and Continuing Medical Education in the Central Denmark Region [31] as a part of the evaluation of the CME sessions

References

    1. Definition of General Practice, EURACT (short version, 2011). [] 28 March 2014.
    1. Michiels E, Deschepper R, Van Der Kelen G, Bernheim JL, Mortier F, Vander Stichele R, Deliens L. The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: a qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin. Palliat Med. 2007;21(5):409–415. doi: 10.1177/0269216307078503.
    1. Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S34–S38. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110216.
    1. Neergaard MA, Bonde Jensen A, Sondergaard J, Sokolowski I, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25(4):627–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00870.x.
    1. Brogaard T, Neergaard MA, Sokolowski I, Olesen F, Jensen AB. Congruence between preferred and actual place of care and death among Danish cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2012;27(2):155–164. doi: 10.1177/0269216312438468.
    1. Dødsårsagsregisteret (The Danish Register of Causes of Deaths). []. Accessed 29 May 2018.
    1. Neergaard MA, Vedsted P, Olesen F, Sokolowski I, Jensen AB, Sondergaard J. Associations between home death and GP involvement in palliative cancer care. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(566):671–677. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X454133.
    1. Brazil K, Bedard M, Willison K. Factors associated with home death for individuals who receive home support services: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2002;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-1-2.
    1. Aabom B, Kragstrup J, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, Stovring H. Population-based study of place of death of patients with cancer: implications for GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(518):684–689.
    1. Winthereik A, Neergaard M, Vedsted P, Jensen A. Danish general practitioners’ self-reported competences in end-of-life care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(4):420–427. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249059.
    1. Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ. 2005;330(7498):1007–1011. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1007.
    1. Johnson MJ, Booth S. Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with chronic heart failure and chronic lung disease. Clin Med. 2010;10(3):286–289. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.10-3-286.
    1. McKinley RK, Stokes T, Exley C, Field D. Care of people dying with malignant and cardiorespiratory disease in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(509):909–913.
    1. End of life care for adults [] 28 April 2016.
    1. Alvarez MP, Agra Y. Systematic review of educational interventions in palliative care for primary care physicians. Palliat Med. 2006;20(7):673–683. doi: 10.1177/0269216306071794.
    1. van Riet Paap J, Vernooij-Dassen M, Sommerbakk R, Moyle W, Hjermstad MJ, Leppert W, Vissers K, Engels Y, IMPACT research team: Implementation of improvement strategies in palliative care: an integrative review. Implement Sci 2015, 10:103–015–0293-2.
    1. Klinisk vejledning for almen praksis: Palliation (Clinical guideline for palliative Care in general practice)[] 10 August 2014.
    1. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, Davis D. Improving patient care - the implementation of change in health care. 2. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell BMJ books; 2013.
    1. Toth-Pal E, Wardh I, Strender LE, Nilsson G. Implementing a clinical decision-support system in practice: a qualitative analysis of influencing attitudes and characteristics among general practitioners. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008;33(1):39–54. doi: 10.1080/17538150801956754.
    1. Robertson J, Moxey AJ, Newby DA, Gillies MB, Williamson M, Pearson SA. Electronic information and clinical decision support for prescribing: state of play in Australian general practice. Fam Pract. 2011;28(1):93–101. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq031.
    1. Martens JD, van der Weijden T, Winkens RA, Kester AD, Geerts PJ, Evers SM, Severens JL. Feasibility and acceptability of a computerised system with automated reminders for prescribing behaviour in primary care. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(3):199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.013.
    1. McDermott L, Yardley L, Little P, Ashworth M, Gulliford M, eCRT Research Team Developing a computer delivered, theory based intervention for guideline implementation in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-90.
    1. Leslie SJ, Hartswood M, Meurig C, McKee SP, Slack R, Procter R, Denvir MA. Clinical decision support software for management of chronic heart failure: development and evaluation. Comput Biol Med. 2006;36(5):495–506. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.02.002.
    1. Mason B, Boyd K, Murray SA, Steyn J, Cormie P, Kendall M, Munday D, Weller D, Fife S, Murchie P, Campbell C. Developing a computerised search to help UK general practices identify more patients for palliative care planning: a feasibility study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0312-z.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010.
    1. Cheater F, Baker R, Gillies C, Hearnshaw H, Flottorp S, Robertson N, Ej S, Ad O: Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;17(3).
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362(9391):1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.
    1. Dansk Almenmedicinsk kvalitetsEnhed, DAK-E (Danish Quality Unit of General Practice). []. Accessed 29 May 2018.
    1. “Practicus” Medlemsblad for DSAM - ePracticus (Trade journal for general practitioners published by the College of Danish general practioners) [] 14 October 2014.
    1. CFK Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling (Unit for Quality and development in Central Denmark Region) [] 13 December 2015.
    1. Remuneration for continuing medical education for GPs in Denmark. []. Accessed 29 May 2018.
    1. Abarshi E, Echteld MA, Van den Block L, Donker GA, Deliens L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Recognising patients who will die in the near future: a nationwide study via the Dutch sentinel network of GPs. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(587):e371–e378. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X578052.
    1. Thoonsen B, Groot M, Engels Y, Prins J, Verhagen S, Galesloot C, van Weel C, Vissers K. Early identification of and proactive palliative care for patients in general practice, incentive and methods of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-123.
    1. Murray SA, Firth A, Schneider N, Van den Eynden B, Gomez-Batiste X, Brogaard T, Villanueva T, Abela J, Eychmuller S, Mitchell G, Downing J, Sallnow L, van Rijswijk E, Barnard A, Lynch M, Fogen F, Moine S. Promoting palliative care in the community: production of the primary palliative care toolkit by the European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce in primary palliative care. Palliat Med. 2015;29(2):101–111. doi: 10.1177/0269216314545006.
    1. Heffner JE. Advance care planning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: barriers and opportunities. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011;17(2):103–109. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328341ce80.
    1. Murray SA, Pinnock H, Sheikh A. Palliative care for people with COPD: we need to meet the challenge. Prim Care Respir J. 2006;15(6):362–364. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.08.008.
    1. Gorlén T, Gorlén TF, Vass M, Neergaard MA: Low confidence among general practitioners in end-of-life care and subcutaneous administration of medicine. Danish Med J. 2012;59(4):A4407.
    1. Shipman C, Addington-Hall J, Barclay S, Briggs J, Cox I, Daniels L, Millar D. Educational opportunities in palliative care: what do general practitioners want? Palliat Med. 2001;15(3):191–196. doi: 10.1191/026921601678576176.
    1. Groot MM, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Crul BJ, Grol RP. General practitioners (GPs) and palliative care: perceived tasks and barriers in daily practice. Palliat Med. 2005;19(2):111–118. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm937oa.
    1. Brogaard T, Bonde Jensen A, Sokolowski I, Olesen F, Neergaard MA. Who is the key worker in palliative home care? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29(3):150–156. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.603282.
    1. Kendall M, Boyd K, Campbell C, Cormie P, Fife S, Thomas K, Weller D, Murray SA. How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. Fam Pract. 2006;23(6):644–650. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml035.
    1. Armstrong D. Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors’ behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55(10):1771–1777. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00309-4.
    1. Armstrong D, Ogden J. The role of etiquette and experimentation in explaining how doctors change behaviour: a qualitative study. Sociol Health Illn. 2006;28(7):951–968.
    1. Brown JM, Patel M, Howard J, Cherry G, Shaw NJ. Changing clinical practice: significant events that influence trainees’ learning. Educ Prim Care. 2011;22(1):25–31. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11493958.
    1. Medical research council (MRC): Dyspnoea scale [] 2 May 2016.
    1. The GSF Toolkit from National Gold Standards Framework Centre. []. Accessed 29 May 2018.
    1. Thoonsen B, Engels Y, Van Rijswijk E, Verhagen S, Van Weel C, Groot M, Vissers K. Early identification of palliative care patients in general practice: development of RADboud indicators for PAlliative care needs (RADPAC) Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(602):e625–e631. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X654597.
    1. Berman AR. Management of patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Prim Care. 2011;38(2):277–297. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2011.03.008.
    1. Gadoud A, Kane E, Macleod U, Ansell P, Oliver S, Johnson M. Palliative care among heart failure patients in primary care: a comparison to cancer patients using English family practice data. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113188.
    1. Claessen SJ, Francke AL, Engels Y, Deliens L. How do GPs identify a need for palliative care in their patients? An interview study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-42.
    1. Thoonsen B, Vissers K, Verhagen S, Prins J, Bor H, van Weel C, Groot M, Engels Y: Training general practitioners in early identification and anticipatory palliative care planning: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2015, 16(1):126-015-0342-6.
    1. Ribe AR, Fenger-Gron M, Vedsted P, Bro F, Kaersvang L, Vestergaard M. Several factors influenced general practitioner participation in the implementation of a disease management programme. Dan Med J. 2014;61(9):A4901.
    1. Guldbrandt LM: The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung Cancer detection in general practice A clinical, cluster-randomised trials Paper IV. Aarhus University, Health; 2014.
    1. EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL. , 29 May 2018
    1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al., Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982;5(6):649-55.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

3
Subskrybuj