Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Effects of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Rabeprazole and Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Lorlatinib in Healthy Participants

Huiping Xu, Melissa T O'Gorman, Sunil Nepal, Lee P James, Katherine Ginman, Yazdi K Pithavala, Huiping Xu, Melissa T O'Gorman, Sunil Nepal, Lee P James, Katherine Ginman, Yazdi K Pithavala

Abstract

Lorlatinib is approved worldwide as treatment for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive and c-ros oncogene 1-positive non-small cell lung cancer. The objectives of this phase 1, open-label crossover study (NCT02569554) in healthy adult participants were to determine (1) the effects of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) rabeprazole on lorlatinib pharmacokinetics (PK), (2) the effects of a high-fat meal on lorlatinib PK, and (3) the relative bioavailability of an oral solution to tablet formulation of lorlatinib under fasted conditions. Participants were followed on-study for ≥50 days after the first dose of lorlatinib. Participants received treatments over 4 periods, with a washout of ≥10 days between consecutive lorlatinib doses. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled and received lorlatinib, and all were assessed for PK and safety. Results showed no effect of multiple doses of rabeprazole on the total plasma exposure of a single oral dose of lorlatinib 100-mg tablets. The results also indicated that a high-fat meal had no effect on lorlatinib PK after a single 100-mg oral dose. In addition, the relative bioavailability of lorlatinib oral solution compared with lorlatinib tablets was complete (approximately 108%). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with that reported in previous studies, and most treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate. These data indicate that lorlatinib can be administered with drugs that modify gastric acid, including PPIs, without restriction. These results also confirm that lorlatinib can be administered regardless of food intake.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02630706.

Keywords: drug-drug interactions; drug-food interactions; food effect; lorlatinib; pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism; proton pump inhibitor; rabeprazole.

Conflict of interest statement

H.X. is a full‐time employee and current stockholder at Pfizer Inc. M.T.O. is a full‐time employee and may hold stock or stock options in Pfizer Inc. S.N. was an employee of Pfizer Inc. at the time this research was conducted and may hold stock or stock options in Pfizer Inc. L.P.J. was an employee of Pfizer Inc. at the time this research was conducted, and is a current stockholder at Pfizer Inc. He holds current employment with Bristol‐Myers Squibb. K.G. is a full‐time employee and current stockholder at Pfizer Inc. Y.K.P. is a full‐time employee and current stockholder at Pfizer Inc.

© 2021 Pfizer Inc. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean plasma lorlatinib concentration‐versus‐time profiles following single oral doses. (A) Linear plot. (B) Semilogarithmic plot.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual and mean plasma lorlatinib AUCinf (A) and Cmax (B). Stars represent the arithmetic means, the open circles represent individual values, and the bars are the standard deviations. AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration‐versus‐time curve from time 0 to infinity; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individual plasma lorlatinib plots of AUCinf and Cmax for lorlatinib 100‐mg tablets versus lorlatinib 100‐mg tablets + a high‐fat meal (A and B) and lorlatinib 100‐mg tablets versus lorlatinib + rabeprazole 20 mg (C and D). Diamonds represent the geometric mean, and stars represent the arithmetic mean. AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration‐versus‐time curve from time 0 to infinity; Cmax, maximum observed plasma concentration.

References

    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer version 5.2021. . Published 2021. Accessed July 7, 2021.
    1. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4‐ALK fusion gene in non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7153):561‐566.
    1. Kwak EL, Bang Y‐J, Camidge DR, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non‐small‐cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(18):1693‐1703.
    1. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK‐positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2385‐2394.
    1. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim D‐W, et al. First‐line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK‐positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2167–2177.
    1. Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crinò L, et al. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK‐rearranged non‐small‐cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND‐5): a randomised, controlled, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):874‐886.
    1. Stypinski D, Fostvedt L, Lam JL, et al. Metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib (PF‐06463922) and evaluation of the impact of radiolabel position and other factors on comparability of data across 2 ADME studies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60(9):1254‐1267.
    1. Zhao D, Chen J, Chu M, Long X, Wang J. Pharmacokinetic‐based drug‐drug interactions with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors: a review. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:1663‐1681.
    1. Patel M, Chen J, McGrory S, et al. The effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib: results of a phase I, open‐label, crossover study in healthy participants. Invest New Drug. 2020;38(1):131‐139.
    1. Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, et al. Lorlatinib in patients with ALK‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1654‐1667.
    1. Syed YY. Lorlatinib: first global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(1):93‐98.
    1. Johnson TW, Richardson PF, Bailey S, et al. Discovery of (10R)‐7‐amino‐12‐fluoro‐2,10,16‐trimethyl‐15‐oxo‐10,15,16,17‐tetrahydro‐2H‐8,4‐(m etheno)pyrazolo[4,3‐h][2,5,11]‐benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine‐3‐carbonitrile (PF‐06463922), a macrocyclic inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c‐ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) with preclinical brain exposure and broad‐spectrum potency against ALK‐resistant mutations. J Med Chem. 2014;57(11):4720‐4744.
    1. Chen W, Jin D, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Li G. The underlying mechanisms of lorlatinib penetration across the blood‐brain barrier and the distribution characteristics of lorlatinib in the brain. Cancer Med. 2020;9(12):4350‐4359.
    1. Li W, Sparidans RW, Wang Y, et al. P‐glycoprotein (MDR1/ABCB1) restricts brain accumulation and cytochrome P450‐3A (CYP3A) limits oral availability of the novel ALK/ROS1 inhibitor lorlatinib. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(8):2029‐2038.
    1. Li W, Sparidans RW, Wang Y, Lebre MC, Beijnen JH, Schinkel AH. Oral coadministration of elacridar and ritonavir enhances brain accumulation and oral availability of the novel ALK/ROS1 inhibitor lorlatinib. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;136:120‐130.
    1. Patel D, Bertz R, Ren S, Boulton DW, Någård M. A systematic review of gastric acid‐reducing agent‐mediated drug‐drug interactions with orally administered medications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(4):447‐462.
    1. Li XQ, Andersson TB, Ahlstrom M, Weidolf L. Comparison of inhibitory effects of the proton pump‐inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole on human cytochrome P450 activities. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(8):821‐827.
    1. Zvyaga T, Chang S‐Y, Chen C, et al. Evaluation of six proton pump inhibitors as inhibitors of various human cytochromes P450: focus on cytochrome P450 2C19. Drug Metab Dispos. 2012;40(9):1698‐1711.
    1. Shaw AT, Felip E, Bauer TM, et al. Lorlatinib in non‐small‐cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangement: an international, multicentre, open‐label, single‐arm first‐in‐man phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1590‐1599.
    1. Chen J, Xu H, Pawlak S, et al. The effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of lorlatinib: results of a phase one, open‐label, crossover study in healthy participants. Adv Ther. 2020;37(2):745‐758.

Source: PubMed

3
Subskrybuj