Relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms, disease progression, and survival in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer

Abstract

Purpose: We hypothesized that common polymorphisms in excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), involved in nucleotide excision repair of platinum-induced damage, would be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with optimally resected, stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) treated with cisplatin and paclitaxel (C+P).

Patients and methods: Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis was carried out by direct pyrosequencing at two sites (codon 118 and C8092A) in ERCC1 in leukocyte DNA from women who participated in the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) phase III protocol-172 and were randomly assigned to intraperitoneal or intravenous C+P.

Results: ERCC1 genotyping was performed in 233 of the 429 women who participated in GOG-172. The genotype distribution at codon 118 was 17% with C/C, 43% with C/T, and 40% with T/T, and the genotype distribution at C8092A was 56% with C/C, 37% with C/A, and 7% with A/A. Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that the codon 118 polymorphism in ERCC1 was not significantly associated with disease progression or death. Women with the C8092A C/A or A/A genotypes compared with the C/C genotype had an increased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.94; P = .018) and death (HR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.09; P = .018). Median PFS and OS were 6 and 17 months shorter for women with the C8092A C/A or A/A genotypes versus the C/C genotype, respectively.

Conclusion: Although the ERCC1 codon 118 polymorphism does not seem to be associated with clinical outcome, the C8092A polymorphism was an independent predictor of PFS and OS in women with optimally resected EOC.

Conflict of interest statement

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked with a “U” are those for which no compensation was received; those relationships marked with a “C” were compensated. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO’s conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Employment or Leadership Position: None Consultant or Advisory Role: None Stock Ownership: None Honoraria: None Research Funding: Kathleen M. Darcy, National Cancer Institute; Chunqiao Tian, National Cancer Institute Expert Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None

Figures

Fig 1

Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A, C) progression-free survival (PFS) and (B, D) overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort categorized by polymorphisms in (A, B) codon 118 and (C, D) C8092A in the ERCC1 gene. Censored indicates women who were alive with no evidence of disease progression at last contact, and event reflects women with documented recurrence/disease progression or death.

Fig 2

Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A, C) progression-free survival and (B, D) overall survival in the subset of women randomly assigned to the (A, B) intraperitoneal (IP) arm or (C, D) intravenous arm and categorized by polymorphisms in C8092A in the ERCC1 gene. Censored indicates women who were alive with no evidence of disease progression at last contact, and event reflects women with documented recurrence/disease progression or death.